지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The object of this thesis was Sin, Chae－Ho"s Fierce Battle of Dragon to Dragon and Lu Xun"s A lunatic’s diary and investigated the similarity and difference of the criticism of slavery and the aspect of its overcome. Two works criticize the cannibalistic society over thousands years and the enslaved men therein. The works reject the romanticism and ideality of revolution through establishment of characters like "elder and younger brother" and depict the change of reality through awareness of the public. Miri and dragon, and the lunatic and elder brother is an inseparable entity, a mirror that reflects each other, that lies in the environment in which conflict and enmity lasts holding two inner values. This establishment of character has the effect of reflecting the inner self－contradiction by nullifying the border between the good and the evil.
Sin, Chae－Ho expands the epic with a radical revolution, while Lu Xun dreams of reformation by the way of infiltrating into the logics of reality. This difference might result from the context the two countries were in, colony and semi－colony. The fact, that Lu Xun was in the situation to be able to intervene deeply in the reality of China, while Sin, Chae－Ho was in the social status as a refugee difficult to contact directly with domestic people, might be a reason that makes a difference between two writers" narrative technique and imbodiment of character.
The issue of slavery the two writers explored can not be seen as a problem of only feudalistic and imperial age. Under the structure of pressure, human being can anytime be recomposed as new slavery to settle down in the cannibalistic structure. The nowness and the meaning of this work can be found in that the enslavement is given rebirth beyond the age.
Sin, Chae－Ho expands the epic with a radical revolution, while Lu Xun dreams of reformation by the way of infiltrating into the logics of reality. This difference might result from the context the two countries were in, colony and semi－colony. The fact, that Lu Xun was in the situation to be able to intervene deeply in the reality of China, while Sin, Chae－Ho was in the social status as a refugee difficult to contact directly with domestic people, might be a reason that makes a difference between two writers" narrative technique and imbodiment of character.
The issue of slavery the two writers explored can not be seen as a problem of only feudalistic and imperial age. Under the structure of pressure, human being can anytime be recomposed as new slavery to settle down in the cannibalistic structure. The nowness and the meaning of this work can be found in that the enslavement is given rebirth beyond the age.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 식인사회에 노예화된 인간
3. 자기부정을 통한 반성적 성찰
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-002750762