지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 104 (104page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study researches on the actual condition and issues of a joint business in rural areas and suggests it with an improved scheme, an incorporated. A joint business at community level is different from a current agricultural corporation system in that the latter is focused on agricultural management. Therefore, it is necessary to consider how to include various types of rural community village business into the agricultural corporation system.
Rural areas development policy in Korea has stimulated a community business in rural areas since 2000. Specific development plans such as Farm Experience Village, Rural Areas Traditional Theme, and Community Development Plan are known to inspire residents’ community consciousness and to vitalize rural areas’ economies by creation of new types of revenue. Based on these benefits, the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries(MIFAFF) planned to organize ‘Rural Community Business Corporation’ as a united concept of a community business(CB) in May 2010.
Because the rural community business in rural areas are at its initial stage, this study was focused on case studies and summarized findings from the case studies. The first step for the case studies was to classify a rural community business into an urban-rural interchange, a regional development, a joint agricultural management, etc. Then, the next step performs a comparison between cases which have agricultural corporation system and cases which do not have.
Characteristic features of a successful rural community village business are summarized as the following. First, a governmental support catalyzes areas’ revenue creation business. Second, a community leader evaluates residents’ community consciousness and vitalizes community corporations.
Third, an agricultural corporation is established so as to secure a continuation of community business.
It is important to clarify an operating regulation because the rural community village business has residents as its members. Specially, the clarification should be focused on a profit share with participants and investors, a expenditure of cost from joint activities, and an establishment of property rights of joint facilities.
It is advisable for the rural community village business to be an association corporation which seeks for common benefits rather than a business organization which seeks for profits. The agricultural corporation corresponds with an idea of rural community village business because it has an collaborating business managements. Since the agricultural corporation has characteristics of an agricultural business managements, it is necessary to have a separate corporation for the rural community village business, for example ‘(a tentative) Rural Community Business Corporation’.
It is necessary to provide the current agricultural corporation with a permission to have business to seek for profits such as a weekend farm, a green-tour system, an agricultural recreation business, and a region specific restaurant. Furthermore, it is necessary to alleviate a verification system so as to stimulate community business corporation’s role to create jobs for the aged in rural areas.
Rural areas development policy in Korea has stimulated a community business in rural areas since 2000. Specific development plans such as Farm Experience Village, Rural Areas Traditional Theme, and Community Development Plan are known to inspire residents’ community consciousness and to vitalize rural areas’ economies by creation of new types of revenue. Based on these benefits, the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries(MIFAFF) planned to organize ‘Rural Community Business Corporation’ as a united concept of a community business(CB) in May 2010.
Because the rural community business in rural areas are at its initial stage, this study was focused on case studies and summarized findings from the case studies. The first step for the case studies was to classify a rural community business into an urban-rural interchange, a regional development, a joint agricultural management, etc. Then, the next step performs a comparison between cases which have agricultural corporation system and cases which do not have.
Characteristic features of a successful rural community village business are summarized as the following. First, a governmental support catalyzes areas’ revenue creation business. Second, a community leader evaluates residents’ community consciousness and vitalizes community corporations.
Third, an agricultural corporation is established so as to secure a continuation of community business.
It is important to clarify an operating regulation because the rural community village business has residents as its members. Specially, the clarification should be focused on a profit share with participants and investors, a expenditure of cost from joint activities, and an establishment of property rights of joint facilities.
It is advisable for the rural community village business to be an association corporation which seeks for common benefits rather than a business organization which seeks for profits. The agricultural corporation corresponds with an idea of rural community village business because it has an collaborating business managements. Since the agricultural corporation has characteristics of an agricultural business managements, it is necessary to have a separate corporation for the rural community village business, for example ‘(a tentative) Rural Community Business Corporation’.
It is necessary to provide the current agricultural corporation with a permission to have business to seek for profits such as a weekend farm, a green-tour system, an agricultural recreation business, and a region specific restaurant. Furthermore, it is necessary to alleviate a verification system so as to stimulate community business corporation’s role to create jobs for the aged in rural areas.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구 필요성
2. 연구 목적
3. 선행연구 검토
[제2장 농업법인 제도의 개요]
1. 농업법인 제도의 추진경과
2. 농업법인의 관련제도와 정책
3. 농업법인의 운영 현황
[제3장 마을공동사업체의 동향과 법인화 실태]
1. 마을공동사업체의 동향과 관련 정책
2. 마을공동사업체의 운영 및 법인화 사례
3. 일본의 집락영농 법인화 사례
4. 마을공동사업체 운영 사례의 시사점
[제4장 마을공동사업체의 법인화 추진 방안]
1. 법인화의 필요성과 의의
2. 마을공동사업체의 법인화를 위한 제도개선 방안
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
농어촌관광 비즈니스의 활성화 방안 연구
농어촌관광학회지
2009 .06
-
농촌형 커뮤니티 비즈니스 관련사업의 평가
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2012 .12
-
커뮤니티 비즈니스의 중장기 육성전략(3/3차연도)
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2013 .12
-
미국법상 S 주식회사제도에 관한 소고
기업법연구
2012 .06
-
농촌휴양마을 조성과 마을의 합리적 발전방안 모색 : 강원도 평창군 차항 2리를 중심으로
농어촌관광학회지
2008 .12
-
일본 농촌지역 관광관련 커뮤니티 비즈니스 연구
무역연구
2013 .01
-
우리나라 소규모 기업의 이중과세문제와 S 주식회사
기업법연구
2012 .12
-
농촌관광 발전을 위한 일본의 지역경영형 농가레스토랑에 대한 고찰
농어촌관광학회지
2005 .12
-
마을특성화사업에 대한 성과 고찰
농어촌관광학회지
2014 .12
-
커뮤니티 비즈니스 중장기 육성방안(1/3차연도)
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2011 .11
-
충북 농촌마을개발사업의 실태와 발전 방안
연구보고서
2010 .12
-
법인세법상 비영리법인의 수익사업에 관한 연구
법학연구
2004 .12
-
e-Business의 동향과 향후 전개 방향
통상정보연구
2001 .06
-
비즈니스 모델 특허를 이용한 신 비즈니스 아이디어 도출
기술경영경제학회 학술발표회
2005 .01
-
서울형 마을기업을 통한 지역공동체 활성화
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2012 .06
-
회사의 기부행위
기업법연구
2004 .06
-
농촌여성 소규모 사업 창업지원방안에 관한 연구
지역사회연구
2005 .12
-
산지유통 활성화를 위한 농식품법인의 역할강화와 정책과제
한국농촌경제연구원 정책연구보고
2012 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002582781