메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
구자정 (대전대학교)
저널정보
한국슬라브유라시아학회 슬라브학보 슬라브학보 제29권 2호
발행연도
2014.6
수록면
47 - 80 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In a heuristic search for the pre-revolutionary origin of Cossack separatism in the Kuban’ region during the Russian civil war period, this study explores Kuban’ Cossack voisko on the eve of the Russian revolution, with particular attention to the growing disparity between “soslovie-bound” voisko and “soslovie-blind” oblast’ that steered the Cossacks into a dead end with the aggravating inogorodnie question. On the one hand, the overall relationship between Cossacks and inogorodnie was a class based one between the “haves” and “have-nots.” The “have-nots” were a large number of rural proletarians, the majority of whom, deprived of the means of production, the land, were subject to various legal and economic discriminations. However, on the other hand, the “haves” were not landlords in the conventional sense, because the Cossacks did not own lands individually. As a result, what appeared in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century Kuban’, was a very peculiar situation that did not exist in the non-Cossack provinces of the Russian empire: an overlapping juxtaposition of class and estate, a modernity-bound relation based on a premodernity-bound demarcation bordering on the identity of soslovie. When the “have-nots” demanded the distribution of the “haves’ land” in the name of soslovie-blind justice at the time of the Russian revolution, the “haves” were forced to find a new “soslovie-blind” raison d’etre to legitimize their age-old soslovie-bound privileges such as land monopoly. The Cossacks’ reaction to this crisis was to refute the demand of inogorodnie by becoming something other than soslovie: an “ethnos.” This problematic move paved the way for Cossack separatism in the years to come.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. “폐지”를 위한 창조?: 쿠반 카자크 보이스코의 모순적 기원
Ⅲ. “이노고로드니예 문제”의 출현
Ⅳ. 이노고로드니예 문제의 귀결: “신분”에서 “민족”으로 ? 카자크 분리주의의 등장
《참고문헌》
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-001687076