메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jeong-Hee Choi (경북대학교)
저널정보
한국국제조세협회 조세학술논집 租稅學術論集 第30輯 第1號
발행연도
2014.2
수록면
297 - 326 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Traditionally, Korea and Japan have observed specific anti-avoidance rules because they have observed strict rule of law emphasizing the taxpayer’s legal stability and predictability. To cope with tax abusive transactions effectively, they operate comprehensive anti-avoidance provisions under limited conditions, which are “the denial provisions for an unreasonable transaction or computation.” Notwithstanding the operation of denial provisions for an unreasonable transaction or computation, tax-abusive arrangements which the denial provisions cannot cover are still implemented successfully, which erodes revenue and is fiercely criticized by the public. However, Korea and Japan changed their existing positions in recent international tax avoidance cases. Korea started to apply the principle of taxation on substance prescribed in s14 of the Basic Act for National Taxes, which was not used by the courts due to its vagueness. Japan also developed “the denial of the legal effect of a transaction under the private law” theory to determine the substance of a transaction and to defeat tax-abusive transactions. This trend shows that they are moving from the observance of strict rule of law toward the acceptance of the comprehensive principle of substantial taxation as grounds for deciding tax-avoidance cases in court. It may further accelerate the enactment of a general anti-avoidance rule to prevent tax avoidance effectively within rule of law.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The Principle of Taxation on Substance
Ⅲ. The Denial Provisions of Unreasonable Transaction or Computation
Ⅳ. The Problems of the Specific Anti-Avoidance Regime
Ⅴ. The Change of the Trend
Ⅵ. The Suggestion for the Enactment of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule
Ⅶ. Conclusion
〈Bibliography〉
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-320-001371466