지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Ironically the higher becomes the rate of growth of global economy, the bigger possibilities of global environmental disaster become. Futhermore neoliberalism on which global economy has been based for recent two decades has aggravated human life conditions through a global aggravation of the income bipolarization. Therefore Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) is a practical device to correct the global paradoxes. CSR refers to companies voluntarily going beyond what the law requires to achieve social and environmental objectives during the course of their daily business activities.
The recent debate on the mandatory adoption of compliance system to listed companies in Korea shows the need for research on CSR from the legislation theory perspective. The core of this debate is whether ‘voluntary initiative’ or ‘legally binding regulation’ is desirable in realizing CSR, and this is the typical subject of legislation theory. And the major legal debate on CSR is whether corporate managers should consider not only shareholders in making their decisions but also other stakeholders affected by those decisions.
The dominant thesis for the nature of the corporate in the United States has been shareholder primacy theory, with this view, corporate managers should make business decisions only for the maximization of the shareholders who invest their money for the purpose of making profits. On the other side of the debate, the norm of corporate social responsibility is a major debate about the nature of the corporation. It would be noticeable that stakeholder theory has become increasingly popular in the United States.
The European Commission encourages companies to apply fair employment practices that respect human rights, particularly where products come from outside the EU. The Commission presents a European strategy to promote CSR. CSR involves companies integrating social and environmental objectives in their business operations and in their interaction with the actors concerned.
I argue that the relationship between narrow business interests and CSR practices is influenced by institutional constraints: state capacity, social collaboration, roles of stakeholders, the engagement of nongovernmental and independent organization, and local community.
The recent debate on the mandatory adoption of compliance system to listed companies in Korea shows the need for research on CSR from the legislation theory perspective. The core of this debate is whether ‘voluntary initiative’ or ‘legally binding regulation’ is desirable in realizing CSR, and this is the typical subject of legislation theory. And the major legal debate on CSR is whether corporate managers should consider not only shareholders in making their decisions but also other stakeholders affected by those decisions.
The dominant thesis for the nature of the corporate in the United States has been shareholder primacy theory, with this view, corporate managers should make business decisions only for the maximization of the shareholders who invest their money for the purpose of making profits. On the other side of the debate, the norm of corporate social responsibility is a major debate about the nature of the corporation. It would be noticeable that stakeholder theory has become increasingly popular in the United States.
The European Commission encourages companies to apply fair employment practices that respect human rights, particularly where products come from outside the EU. The Commission presents a European strategy to promote CSR. CSR involves companies integrating social and environmental objectives in their business operations and in their interaction with the actors concerned.
I argue that the relationship between narrow business interests and CSR practices is influenced by institutional constraints: state capacity, social collaboration, roles of stakeholders, the engagement of nongovernmental and independent organization, and local community.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기업의 사회적 책임에 관한 개념 및 이론
Ⅲ. 회사의 본질과 기업의 사회적 책임
Ⅳ. 세계 각국의 기업의 사회적 책임 규제
Ⅴ. 맺음말
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (86)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-360-001113253