지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Specialized translators usually have the continuum of information needs in translation process, ranging from lexical or terminological to stylistic or encyclopedic information. Legal translators are in need of a variety of documentary resources to meet these information needs because the complexity and speciality of legal texts require considerable legal knowledge as well as linguistic competence. European translators commonly use corpora in legal translation process as documentary resources, along with other translation software including CAT tools and term tools. Corpus-based approach in legal translation is found especially useful in complementing and validating dictionaries and thus reducing arbitrary decisions of translators. However, Korean legal translators are allowed very limited access to legal corpora compared to European counterparts because they are excluded from, or are included in relatively small samples, in bilingual comparable corpora. Against this backdrop, this article built DIY corpus (ad hoc corpus) consisting of United States Code with AntConc software and applied such corpus in analyzing English translations of causative verbs in Korean statutes. DIY corpus revealed that causatives make/require/cause are more frequently used in United States Code than English translations of Korean statutes. Also, concordancing with have/let/make/require/cause showed delicately different legal meanings and usages which cannot be ascertained with general or legaldictionaries or thesauri.
목차
1. 문제의 제기
2. 법률 번역에서 코퍼스의 활용
3. DIY 코퍼스 편찬 및 활용 사례
4. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-003362009