지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Certain instances of double relativization are possible in Korean, and one syntactic explanation for it is that they are derived from multiple subject constructions without violating the CNPC and that they thus do not pose a problem for the null operator movement analysis of relativization (Han and Kim 2004). Despite its merit of capturing the strong correlation in the acceptability of DRCs and their MSC counterparts, this account has many counterexamples and its explanatory power is limited in that it can explain only the DRCs in Korean. In this paper, I propose an account which does not suffer from the kind of problems a purely syntactic account like Han and Kim has but can still capture the strong correlation between DRCs and MSCs. In short, my claim is that such an account can be found if we take a processing approach to island effects.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Against a Purely Syntactic Account of Han & Kim (2004)
3. Conditions for Double Relativization in Korean
4. Processing Explanations for the Conditions on Double Relativzation in Korean
5. Explaining the Strong but Partial Correlation Between DRCs and MSCs
6. Relativization out of Other Islands in Korean
7. Cross-linguistic Differences in Double Relativization
8. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Multiple Opacity in Wintu Mid-Vowels
Minkyung Lee
언어
2011
.06
On a Pragmatic Account of Intervention Effects : A Reply to Moon et al. (2009)
Eun-Ju Noh
언어
2010
.03
영어의 결과구문과 한국어의 “게” 구문
홍기선
언어
2011
.12
추측을 나타내는 양태 표현의 문법 제약 : 문법적 연어구성을 중심으로
한정한
,
정희숙
언어
2011
.12
중국인 학습자들의 한국어 모음 습득 과정에 대한 1년간의 종단연구
한정임
,
김주연
언어
2011
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-003097470