지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper compares the English resultative construction with the Korean “key” construction from a typological point of view. It argues that the Korean “key” construction denotes the result states which might be expected in the due process of an event, as well as the actually realized result states as the English resultative construction does. It further argues that the“key” expression constitutes an adjunct clause which might contain a pro, irrespective of the type distinctions generally assumed in previous research. This naturally accounts for its free position within a sentence, the occurrence of the honorific marker “si,” the discourse-oriented selection of the second subject and the so-called extension
structures. This paper attempts to relate these differences to the typological characteristics of the two languages, such as the polysemous nature of Korean verbal suffixes, word order flexibility, syntax- or discourse-oriented anaphoric expressions and the repertoire of lexical items and exocentric structures that each language has.
structures. This paper attempts to relate these differences to the typological characteristics of the two languages, such as the polysemous nature of Korean verbal suffixes, word order flexibility, syntax- or discourse-oriented anaphoric expressions and the repertoire of lexical items and exocentric structures that each language has.
목차
1. 서론
2. 기존연구 개관
3. 새로운 분석
4. 유형론적 함의
5. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-003144145