지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this study, author tries to reexamine bronze age of North Korea in two new methodological suggestions. First, author suggest to reassess the level of archaeological sources from North Korea. Most of artefacts concerned bronze age of North Korea in South Korea were acquired by japanese archaeologist during Colonial period, subsequently most of them has poorly documented in the context of archaeology. Secondly. most of archaeological publication made by North Korean archaeologist were reported under.
Like this, archaeological materials from North Korea were gathered and reported in thoroughly different manners, accordingly, plain crossdating of North Korean materials with South Korean materials could be regarded carelessly.
So, Author tries to build a macro-viewed chronological sequence of North Korean bronze age with according to recently excavated material from neighboured regions as the Yanbian area of Jilin Province of China and the Southern Primorie of Russia.
As the result, author divides the bronze culture of North Korea into 5 phases. 1) transition period from neolithic to bronze ages(20th~15th centuries B.C.) 2) the early phase(15~12th centuries B.C.) represented by the appearance of dolmen and cairn in Liaodong and western area of North Korea, and xingcheng culture in easter part of North Korea. 3) the middle phase(11~8th centuries B.C.) could be regarded as usage of stone cist tombs in North Korea. For example, Machengzi-Misongni culture in the North-western part and Acorn-shaped pottery culture in Daedong river basin belong to this stone cist tome zones. Besides, North-eastern part of North Korea belongs to Liutingdong type in Tumen river basin, which is characterized by the coarse bowl with straight rim and croissant shaped stone knifes. It is worthwhile to note that the practice of stone cist tombs were spread over from Liaodong to South Korea and Yanbian area. This kind of long-distanced interaction could be explained by the wide introduction of intensive cereal agriculture. 4) the late period of bronze age(8~5th B.C. century), wellknown lute shaped dagger culture were spread over Liaodong and western part of North Korea. Besides, in the north-eastern part of North Korea were divided into continental agricultural type(the late Liutingtong type) and maritime type with shell midden(Yankovski Culture) on the coastal area. Finally, around 4th century B.C. bronze age were ended by the expansion of dynasty Yan and introduction of iron tools, simultaneously Duanjie-Krounovka culture firmed in the north-easter part of North Korea and neighboured regions.
Like this, archaeological materials from North Korea were gathered and reported in thoroughly different manners, accordingly, plain crossdating of North Korean materials with South Korean materials could be regarded carelessly.
So, Author tries to build a macro-viewed chronological sequence of North Korean bronze age with according to recently excavated material from neighboured regions as the Yanbian area of Jilin Province of China and the Southern Primorie of Russia.
As the result, author divides the bronze culture of North Korea into 5 phases. 1) transition period from neolithic to bronze ages(20th~15th centuries B.C.) 2) the early phase(15~12th centuries B.C.) represented by the appearance of dolmen and cairn in Liaodong and western area of North Korea, and xingcheng culture in easter part of North Korea. 3) the middle phase(11~8th centuries B.C.) could be regarded as usage of stone cist tombs in North Korea. For example, Machengzi-Misongni culture in the North-western part and Acorn-shaped pottery culture in Daedong river basin belong to this stone cist tome zones. Besides, North-eastern part of North Korea belongs to Liutingdong type in Tumen river basin, which is characterized by the coarse bowl with straight rim and croissant shaped stone knifes. It is worthwhile to note that the practice of stone cist tombs were spread over from Liaodong to South Korea and Yanbian area. This kind of long-distanced interaction could be explained by the wide introduction of intensive cereal agriculture. 4) the late period of bronze age(8~5th B.C. century), wellknown lute shaped dagger culture were spread over Liaodong and western part of North Korea. Besides, in the north-eastern part of North Korea were divided into continental agricultural type(the late Liutingtong type) and maritime type with shell midden(Yankovski Culture) on the coastal area. Finally, around 4th century B.C. bronze age were ended by the expansion of dynasty Yan and introduction of iron tools, simultaneously Duanjie-Krounovka culture firmed in the north-easter part of North Korea and neighboured regions.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 무문토기문화권 속의 북한
Ⅲ. 북한과 주변지역의 청동기시대의 시기별 제 양상
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (102)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강성윤 / 2006 / 북한의 학문분류체계 / 북한연구학회보 10 (1) : 1 ~ 24
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강인욱 / 1996 / 遼寧地域琵琶形銅劍에 대한 一考察 / 한국상고사학보 (21)
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강인욱 / 2003 / 요령지방 태자하상류지역 신발견 채문토기에 대하여 / 고고학 2 (2)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강인욱 / 2003 / 연해주 청동기의 일고찰 / 박물관기요 17
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강인욱 / 2005 / 區系類型論과 중국 동북지방의 고고학-중국 동북지방 고고학에 대한 이론적 접근 / 한국고고학보 56 : 5 ~ 26
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강인욱 / 1996 / 遼寧地域琵琶形銅劍에 대한 一考察 / 한국상고사학보 (21)
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강인욱 / 2003 / 요령지방 태자하상류지역 신발견 채문토기에 대하여 / 고고학 2 (2)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강인욱 / 2003 / 연해주 청동기의 일고찰 / 박물관기요 17
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강인욱 / 2005 / 區系類型論과 중국 동북지방의 고고학-중국 동북지방 고고학에 대한 이론적 접근 / 한국고고학보 56 : 5 ~ 26
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-002363391