지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.6
- 수록면
- 69 - 75 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives：The current study was conducted in order to investigate teachers’recognition of school bullying using a nationwide database of adolescents in middle and high school in Korea.
Methods：Students in the 7th to 12th grades at 23 secondary schools participated in the current study during the fall of 2009. Subjects completed the self-report form of the Adolescent Mental Health and Problem Behavior Screening Questionnaire-II (AMPQII) and Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90-R). In addition, relevant teachers used the teachers’ rating scale of the AMPQ-II to report their students’ status. Differences in the number of bullied students between teachers’ recognition and students’ report were explored.
Results：A total of 2270 subjects provided relevant responses to the questionnaire. While the one-month prevalence of victimization according to students’ self-reports was 28.9%, the recognized prevalence by teachers was only 10.6%. For prediction of the presence of school bullying according to students’ self reports on the AMPQ-II, item 7 of the teachers’ report on the AMPQ-II showed a sensitivity of 16%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictability of 44%, a negative predictability of 72%, a false positive rate of 8%, a false negative rate of 84%, and an accuracy of 69%, respectively. No significant differences in subscores of students’ self reports of the AMPQ-II and SCL-90-R were observed between bullied students who were recognized by teachers and those who were not recognized. In stepwise discriminant analysis, classification of teachers’ item 2 and item 7 on the AMPQ-II with respect to school bullying according to students’ reports showed an accuracy of 63.4%. Using this model, 75.2% of non-victimized subjects were classified correctly, while only 35.2% of victimized subjects were classified correctly.
Conclusion：Despite the high prevalence in Korea, teachers’ recognition of school violence among their students remains low. Pre-professional and continuing education to improve teachers’ understanding of school bullying and knowledge of effective classroom-based prevention activities should be encouraged.
Methods：Students in the 7th to 12th grades at 23 secondary schools participated in the current study during the fall of 2009. Subjects completed the self-report form of the Adolescent Mental Health and Problem Behavior Screening Questionnaire-II (AMPQII) and Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90-R). In addition, relevant teachers used the teachers’ rating scale of the AMPQ-II to report their students’ status. Differences in the number of bullied students between teachers’ recognition and students’ report were explored.
Results：A total of 2270 subjects provided relevant responses to the questionnaire. While the one-month prevalence of victimization according to students’ self-reports was 28.9%, the recognized prevalence by teachers was only 10.6%. For prediction of the presence of school bullying according to students’ self reports on the AMPQ-II, item 7 of the teachers’ report on the AMPQ-II showed a sensitivity of 16%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictability of 44%, a negative predictability of 72%, a false positive rate of 8%, a false negative rate of 84%, and an accuracy of 69%, respectively. No significant differences in subscores of students’ self reports of the AMPQ-II and SCL-90-R were observed between bullied students who were recognized by teachers and those who were not recognized. In stepwise discriminant analysis, classification of teachers’ item 2 and item 7 on the AMPQ-II with respect to school bullying according to students’ reports showed an accuracy of 63.4%. Using this model, 75.2% of non-victimized subjects were classified correctly, while only 35.2% of victimized subjects were classified correctly.
Conclusion：Despite the high prevalence in Korea, teachers’ recognition of school violence among their students remains low. Pre-professional and continuing education to improve teachers’ understanding of school bullying and knowledge of effective classroom-based prevention activities should be encouraged.
목차
서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
References
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
청소년정서행동발달검사 표준화연구 자료를 활용한 학교폭력 피해 전국유병률 및 관련요인 조사
방수영
,
유한익
,
김지훈
외 7명
소아청소년정신의학
2012
.03
청소년용 정신건강 선별검사 개정 연구 : 청소년 정서행동발달 검사의 개발
방수영
,
유한익
,
김지훈
외 7명
소아청소년정신의학
2011
.12
학령기 아동 정서ㆍ행동문제에 대한 부모-교사 평가 일치도
박효인
,
김진미
,
박용천
외 2명
소아청소년정신의학
2010
.10
학교폭력에 대한 효율적 대처 방안 : 법무부 추진방안을 중심으로
조종태
저스티스
2013
.02
우리나라 고등학교의 정신건강이 학업성취도와 학업중단율에 미치는 영향
방은주
,
김두형
,
노법래
외 5명
소아청소년정신의학
2016
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-516-000731442