지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this paper is to understand the characteristics of Hamlet’s suffering in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet in terms of Buddhist Theory of Three Seals (三法印), namely, the Three Marks of Existence. The Three Marks of Existence means the three characteristics of ordinary life. The first of the three is Dukkha (Sanskrit duhkha) or unsatisfactoriness, ‘dis-ease’, sometimes translated “suffering” which means that nothing found in the physical world or even the psychological realm can bring lasting deep satisfaction. The second is Anicca (Sanskrit anitya) or Impermanence which refers to the fact that all conditioned things eventually cease to exist, but also that all conditioned things are in a constant state of flux. And the third is Anatt (Sanskrit anatman), non-Self, or impersonality which states that the human personality, “soul”, or Self, is a conventional appellation applied to the assembly of physical and psychological components, each individually subject to constant flux. The basic quality of Hamlet’s speeches throughout the work Hamlet is unsatisfactoriness
which can be quite easily analysed and understood in terms of the Buddhist Three Seals. These three characteristics are said to be in mutual relationship: Whatever is impermanent is subject to change. What is subject to change is subject to suffering. What ever is subject to suffering is non-Self.
Hamlet’s soliloquies and some of his speeches are reflection of the process of his spiritual change, that is, understanding the characteristics and meaning of both his experiences and role in his world. His first soliloquy is about Dukkha in his world. The causes of this Dukkha are ignorance and grasping of Gertrude and Claudius, with which Hamlet is completely unsatisfied. Hamlet’s thorough understanding of the Anicca of a human body culminates in the Graveyard scene while his understanding of the Anicca of mind, possibly the Anatt of human soul, is shown in his first soliloquy and the speeches of the Player King which is supposed to have been written by Hamlet himself. Hi soliloquy “To be or not to be” and his “perfect conscience” speech to Horatio in Act 5 scene 2 reflect the importance of conscience, the faculty of knowing and understanding, which can be likened to Buddhist wisdom. Hence he comes to understand his role as a revenger and is ready for action with equanimity.
The Buddhist Three Seals and Hamlet’s speech share much in common in the fields of Dukkha, Anicca, and Anatt . But their goals differs in that a Buddhist practitioner aims at the liberation from Dukkha via wisdom and non-violence while Hamlet as a son-a courtier-a soldier-a scholar must use his wisdom to serve the moral and ethical demands of his world.
which can be quite easily analysed and understood in terms of the Buddhist Three Seals. These three characteristics are said to be in mutual relationship: Whatever is impermanent is subject to change. What is subject to change is subject to suffering. What ever is subject to suffering is non-Self.
Hamlet’s soliloquies and some of his speeches are reflection of the process of his spiritual change, that is, understanding the characteristics and meaning of both his experiences and role in his world. His first soliloquy is about Dukkha in his world. The causes of this Dukkha are ignorance and grasping of Gertrude and Claudius, with which Hamlet is completely unsatisfied. Hamlet’s thorough understanding of the Anicca of a human body culminates in the Graveyard scene while his understanding of the Anicca of mind, possibly the Anatt of human soul, is shown in his first soliloquy and the speeches of the Player King which is supposed to have been written by Hamlet himself. Hi soliloquy “To be or not to be” and his “perfect conscience” speech to Horatio in Act 5 scene 2 reflect the importance of conscience, the faculty of knowing and understanding, which can be likened to Buddhist wisdom. Hence he comes to understand his role as a revenger and is ready for action with equanimity.
The Buddhist Three Seals and Hamlet’s speech share much in common in the fields of Dukkha, Anicca, and Anatt . But their goals differs in that a Buddhist practitioner aims at the liberation from Dukkha via wisdom and non-violence while Hamlet as a son-a courtier-a soldier-a scholar must use his wisdom to serve the moral and ethical demands of his world.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 본론
Ⅲ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
갈등의 양상과 의미 : 햄릿의 독백을 중심으로
동서인문학
2010 .12
-
『햄릿』의 불교적 해석 - 복수와 자아
Shakespeare Review
2000 .03
-
Human Nature in Hamlet
비평문학
2006 .12
-
Hamlet의 Delay
Shakespeare Review
1985 .08
-
Hamlet의 비극적 의미
코기토
1981 .12
-
Death of Hamlet
Shakespeare Review
1991 .06
-
번뇌의 소멸과 해탈의 성취－아라한의 심해탈과 혜해탈에 대하여
불교학연구
2018 .01
-
「햄릿」의 시적 스타일
신영어영문학
2012 .11
-
정의와 사랑 : Hamlet의 문제
Shakespeare Review
1996 .06
-
Hamlet의 감옥
Shakespeare Review
1997 .06
-
Re-reading Hamlet: Focusing on Hamlet’s Quest for the Truth
영어영문학연구
2008 .01
-
셰익스피어의 『햄릿』과 테니슨의 『모드』의 비교연구: 생각의 문제
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
햄릿의 자기(Self)의 재형성
Shakespeare Review
2010 .03
-
햄릿에서 셰익스피어의 관객 통제
고전 르네상스 영문학
2015 .01
-
Hamlet에 나타난 시간의 지연과 그 의미
동서문화
1997 .02
-
〈햄릿-디 액터〉의 햄릿 이야기 연출하기
Shakespeare Review
2014 .06
-
A Synthesis of Lacanian Psychoanalysis and New Historicism in Explicating Hamlet’s Third Soliloquy
현대정신분석
2017 .08
-
햄릿의 젠더 미스터리 : 아스타 닐슨의 〈햄릿 : 복수극〉
Shakespeare Review
2007 .06
-
『햄릿』: 여성에 대한 남성의 종속
Shakespeare Review
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
정신분석적 『햄릿』 비평 고찰
남정섭
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2013
.05
아리스토텔레스의 『시학』을 바라보는 엇갈린 눈길 : 셰익스피어의 『햄릿』과 체호프의 『갈매기』를 중심으로
김규종
동북아 문화연구
2012
.09
『햄릿』 : 분열된 욕망과 복수의 정치학
강석주
Shakespeare Review
2011
.06
『햄릿』의 은유 양식 : 극중 인물의 병치구조
윤희억
Shakespeare Review
2006
.12
햄릿의 행위와 헤겔의 불행한 의식 : 인간의 진실한 존재는 오히려 그의 행위의 결과에 있다. - 헤겔의 『정신현상학』중에서
김달영
Shakespeare Review
2005
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-000780344