지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.12
- 수록면
- 607 - 625 (19page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The philosophical concept 'Unhappy Consciousness' created in Hegel's The Phenomenology of Spirit, representing his dialectical ontology, gives us a few essential clues which can be possible to read Hamlet in comprehensive ways. Human's consciousness, called 'changeable consciousness' by Hegel, denies himself/herself and searches for essence from something ideal(the immutable; God) which is opposed to himself/herself. On the second phase, as the Christ unifies essence and nonessence with making himself Gestalt in this world by his incarnation(alienation), consciousness is sublated(aufgehoben) to the immutable in the coarse of alienating itself, losing its substance, and becomes the simple movement of consciousness itself. However, the movement of consciousness contains the limitation of subjectivity(lacking universality). On the last third phase, after cognizing the limitation or the impossibility of itself, posing itself as a substance(objectivity; humble thing), the consciousness achieves the in-and-for-itself state, or a subject.
Hamlet is loaded with the duty of revenge and cognizes the underworld when he meets the ghost of his father. The ghost, the real in Lacan's term, exteriorly, is the gap which cannot be rationalized only with revenge and, interiorly, Hamlet's truth(essence) which has no way to be expressed. Hamlet alienates(denies) himself, regarding the kingdom of Denmark as a prison. The situation of the kingdom is the whole nightmare as the ghost appears at night, the places of Claudius, Gertrude and Hamlet are 'condensed' and 'displaced' even in the day time. Also their languages, composed of oximorons or puns, in a sense, are too hypercritical and vain, like floating desires which lack their substances. Borrowing Hegel's term, we may call it the specific without the universal or the situation that is full of extreme subjectivity. The full grown subjectivity of Hamlet appears well enough in his too early(murdering Polonius) or too late(delaying the revenge) behaviors. Nevertheless, considering differences between him and the play(art), he faces with a momentous turn. In spite of his abundant fret and agony, his own work or drama is not written yet. Therefore he has neither his own substance nor universal.
Having a few chances, Hamlet returns to his truth and becomes a subject. As a prince and soldier Fortinbras does his utmost even at a humiliating duty, also as a handsome youth Laertes shows hypocritical rhetorics at the tomb of his sister, both they play their mirror-roles for Hamlet. He identifies himself with them. Becoming a foil, posing himself as a humble substance(seam of universality), Hamlet willingly turns himself into 'the vanishing mediator' who ends up the raging illness of Denmark. According to Lacan, it is the state that a subject comes back to the place which his destiny already written in.
Hamlet is loaded with the duty of revenge and cognizes the underworld when he meets the ghost of his father. The ghost, the real in Lacan's term, exteriorly, is the gap which cannot be rationalized only with revenge and, interiorly, Hamlet's truth(essence) which has no way to be expressed. Hamlet alienates(denies) himself, regarding the kingdom of Denmark as a prison. The situation of the kingdom is the whole nightmare as the ghost appears at night, the places of Claudius, Gertrude and Hamlet are 'condensed' and 'displaced' even in the day time. Also their languages, composed of oximorons or puns, in a sense, are too hypercritical and vain, like floating desires which lack their substances. Borrowing Hegel's term, we may call it the specific without the universal or the situation that is full of extreme subjectivity. The full grown subjectivity of Hamlet appears well enough in his too early(murdering Polonius) or too late(delaying the revenge) behaviors. Nevertheless, considering differences between him and the play(art), he faces with a momentous turn. In spite of his abundant fret and agony, his own work or drama is not written yet. Therefore he has neither his own substance nor universal.
Having a few chances, Hamlet returns to his truth and becomes a subject. As a prince and soldier Fortinbras does his utmost even at a humiliating duty, also as a handsome youth Laertes shows hypocritical rhetorics at the tomb of his sister, both they play their mirror-roles for Hamlet. He identifies himself with them. Becoming a foil, posing himself as a humble substance(seam of universality), Hamlet willingly turns himself into 'the vanishing mediator' who ends up the raging illness of Denmark. According to Lacan, it is the state that a subject comes back to the place which his destiny already written in.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Re-reading Hamlet: Focusing on Hamlet’s Quest for the Truth
영어영문학연구
2008 .01
-
갈등의 양상과 의미 : 햄릿의 독백을 중심으로
동서인문학
2010 .12
-
Hamlet의 Delay
Shakespeare Review
1985 .08
-
햄릿의 허무주의
Shakespeare Review
2006 .03
-
Hamlet의 비극적 의미
코기토
1981 .12
-
Death of Hamlet
Shakespeare Review
1991 .06
-
Hamlet의 감옥
Shakespeare Review
1997 .06
-
「햄릿」의 시적 스타일
신영어영문학
2012 .11
-
Human Nature in Hamlet
비평문학
2006 .12
-
『햄릿』의 애도와 우울증 분석 : 프로이드와 라깡을 경유해서
Shakespeare Review
2008 .09
-
정의와 사랑 : Hamlet의 문제
Shakespeare Review
1996 .06
-
〈햄릿-디 액터〉의 햄릿 이야기 연출하기
Shakespeare Review
2014 .06
-
셰익스피어의 『햄릿』과 테니슨의 『모드』의 비교연구: 생각의 문제
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
햄릿에서 셰익스피어의 관객 통제
고전 르네상스 영문학
2015 .01
-
햄릿의 젠더 미스터리 : 아스타 닐슨의 〈햄릿 : 복수극〉
Shakespeare Review
2007 .06
-
햄릿의 광기: 탈영토적 욕망기계
영어영문학21
2008 .01
-
햄릿의 자기(Self)의 재형성
Shakespeare Review
2010 .03
-
Hamlet에 나타난 시간의 지연과 그 의미
동서문화
1997 .02
-
『햄릿』: 여성에 대한 남성의 종속
Shakespeare Review
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003077975