지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 114 (114page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Seoul is facing several challenges ahead, such as rapid increasing of aging issues, global warming and economic crisis. The aging rate of Seoul is increasing rapidly compared to the similar level of advanced countries and the weakness of economic competitiveness is a big challenge to Seoul Under these circumstances, Seoul should develop and prepare proper and adequate solutions for the issues. In other words, in the periods of paradigm shift - from hardware to software -, Seoul has to make policies for adding values of metropolitan areas and find out competitive factors for seoul itself.
We know well that almost every cities have been endeavoring to gain the ability to coordinate complex activities at a global scale. Many experts lays great emphasis on the role of city. Today is the "era of city" symbolized be megalopolises. In other words, it is time for Seoul to set specific visions and poliies for themselves to survive the ever changing future.
In this study, we’ve been searching for the strategies for making seoul more competitive In chapter 2, we review the overall figures of good governance specially focused on the soft power and citizen-centric policy. We put the importance on the citizen-centric paradigm and the multi-version strategy in the period of transition. And we also lay emphasis on the good governance of Seoul which should include the responsive, equitable, participatory, consensus oriented and transparent.
In chapter 3, we compare many strategies of other countries to that of seoul. Through this analysis, we could draw some implication. In this chapter we review cases of Obama admistration, New York, London, San Francisco and, Shanghai. Under the Obama administration, it is focused on the role of city and the department of city policy is launched. Specially, community development block grant(CDBG) is strongly supported than ever before. In the New York vision for 2020, greener and greater NY plan is started. Renovation of infrastructure of NY, sustainable house plan and open space project are included in it. In the planning for a better London, the key space project cover the opportunity area, area for intensification, area for regeneration, strategic employment locations. According to the San Francisco plan, better neighborhood and a better city for everyone are stressed. Shanghai plan shows the basic of governmental policy which cover the concrete goal settings, forcing of general plan and coordination and the renovation of governmental organization. In other words, it is stressed on the role of installation and safeguards.
In chapter 4, we analyse challenges of Seoul in detail. We review the changes of population structure, the issue of megacity region and the new classification in Seoul. Seoul is rapidly increasing the population of aging and we could predict the 22.3% of aging population by 2030. Single person household is also increasing rapidly than ever before. The rise of single living has been one of the most important demographic shifts of recent decades. Increasing single living may lead to greater isolation and worse health and mental health for some groups, particularly men and aging people. There is some evidence that the growth in single living could be "harnessed" to improve levels of social capital if policy can respond appropriately.
In chapter 5, we survey citizen survey and opinion leader survey. According to the citizen survey, 87.2% of respondents say that they agree the importance of creativity in the governance, but relatively low percent of citizen(37.8%) recognized the creative governance. Over half of the respondents satisfied the performance of government. According to the expert survey, they put emphasis on the future vision of seoul and vench marking strategy.
In conclusion, we propose the enforcing of organizationalware, that is the approach of whole and social aspect of the city. And we also put the emphasis on the softpower and the third space which is the combination of public and private and work and play. Finally, we also say that enhance of attractiveness of city based on the tradition and identity.
We know well that almost every cities have been endeavoring to gain the ability to coordinate complex activities at a global scale. Many experts lays great emphasis on the role of city. Today is the "era of city" symbolized be megalopolises. In other words, it is time for Seoul to set specific visions and poliies for themselves to survive the ever changing future.
In this study, we’ve been searching for the strategies for making seoul more competitive In chapter 2, we review the overall figures of good governance specially focused on the soft power and citizen-centric policy. We put the importance on the citizen-centric paradigm and the multi-version strategy in the period of transition. And we also lay emphasis on the good governance of Seoul which should include the responsive, equitable, participatory, consensus oriented and transparent.
In chapter 3, we compare many strategies of other countries to that of seoul. Through this analysis, we could draw some implication. In this chapter we review cases of Obama admistration, New York, London, San Francisco and, Shanghai. Under the Obama administration, it is focused on the role of city and the department of city policy is launched. Specially, community development block grant(CDBG) is strongly supported than ever before. In the New York vision for 2020, greener and greater NY plan is started. Renovation of infrastructure of NY, sustainable house plan and open space project are included in it. In the planning for a better London, the key space project cover the opportunity area, area for intensification, area for regeneration, strategic employment locations. According to the San Francisco plan, better neighborhood and a better city for everyone are stressed. Shanghai plan shows the basic of governmental policy which cover the concrete goal settings, forcing of general plan and coordination and the renovation of governmental organization. In other words, it is stressed on the role of installation and safeguards.
In chapter 4, we analyse challenges of Seoul in detail. We review the changes of population structure, the issue of megacity region and the new classification in Seoul. Seoul is rapidly increasing the population of aging and we could predict the 22.3% of aging population by 2030. Single person household is also increasing rapidly than ever before. The rise of single living has been one of the most important demographic shifts of recent decades. Increasing single living may lead to greater isolation and worse health and mental health for some groups, particularly men and aging people. There is some evidence that the growth in single living could be "harnessed" to improve levels of social capital if policy can respond appropriately.
In chapter 5, we survey citizen survey and opinion leader survey. According to the citizen survey, 87.2% of respondents say that they agree the importance of creativity in the governance, but relatively low percent of citizen(37.8%) recognized the creative governance. Over half of the respondents satisfied the performance of government. According to the expert survey, they put emphasis on the future vision of seoul and vench marking strategy.
In conclusion, we propose the enforcing of organizationalware, that is the approach of whole and social aspect of the city. And we also put the emphasis on the softpower and the third space which is the combination of public and private and work and play. Finally, we also say that enhance of attractiveness of city based on the tradition and identity.
목차
[표지]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[요약 및 정책건의]
[제1장 서론]
제1절 연구배경 및 목적
제2절 연구내용 및 연구체계
[제2장 시정전환기와 도시거버넌스]
제1절 시정전환기의 시정거버넌스: 소프트파워와 시민중심성
제2절 Good Governance 구축을 위한 기본 방향
[제3장 해외 도시의 글로벌경쟁력과 시정 전략계획 비교]
제1절 도시경쟁력 비교에 나타난 서울의 강·약점
제2절 해외대도시의 시정(市政) 전략계획 분석
[제4장 서울의 시정환경 변화와주요 이슈]
제1절 서울의 인구구조의 변화
제2절 서울 도시공간변화와 Megacity Region 전략
제3절 계층구조의 변화
[제5장 서울의 시정전략 수립을위한 수요조사]
제1절 서울시민의 시정 정책 수요
제2절 전문가 조사
[제6장 결론: 서울의 도시가치제고 전략]
제1절 연구결과 요약
제2절 정책제언
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[영문요약(Abstract)]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
서울의 창의시정 모델 연구
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2008 .12
-
u-Cities: Vision, Model & Strategies
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2005 .05
-
서울의 도시정체성과 도시브랜드의 영향요인 및 중요도 분석 : 서울시민과 전문가를 대상으로 한 내부 커뮤니케이션분석
관광연구저널
2011 .07
-
세계 기후환경수도 서울의 비전 수립 및 특화전략 제안 연구
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2013 .02
-
지속가능한 도시발전을 위한 문화거버넌스 체계에 관한 연구
문화정책논총
2019 .08
-
로컬거버넌스가 도시창조성 및 도시애호도에 미치는 영향 : 부산광역시를 중심으로
관광레저연구
2017 .10
-
정부중재형 거버넌스 체제의 운영전략에 관한 연구 : 이해관계자들의 범위와 역할, 그리고 거버넌스 역량의 결정요인을 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2003 .11
-
이원화된 U-City 사업 수행 체계 혁신을 위한 거버넌스 모델
한국IT서비스학회 학술대회
2009 .01
-
U-City 추진현황과 발전전략
지적과 국토정보
2009 .01
-
마을 만들기 거버넌스 특성과 평가에 관한 연구 : 순천시 사례를 중심으로
도시행정학보
2008 .12
-
마산시 도시재생사업 거버넌스의 특성과 평가에 관한 연구
한국지역개발학회지
2008 .12
-
거버넌스를 통한 녹색도시 만들기
한국정부학회 학술발표논문집
2010 .12
-
U-City 이슈 해결을 위한 정책방향
한국도시지리학회지
2012 .01
-
건강한 도시환경 거버넌스 구축을 위한 영향요인에 관한 연구 : 지방 건강도시 평가사례를 중심으로
주거환경
2014 .06
-
주민자치와 로컬 거버넌스 사례 연구: 고양시 자치도시 실험을 중심으로
국정관리연구
2018 .01
-
스마트도시 전략과 추진체계 개선방안
한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .10
-
우리나라 로컬 거버넌스에 관한 논의의 실제와 함의 : 도시 거버넌스와 지방분권을 강조하며
지방정부연구
2005 .02
-
e-거버넌스의 발전모형과 활용과제에 대한 탐색적 접근
지역개발연구
2006 .06
-
도시간 상호관계분석에 의한 한국 도시체계의 이해
도시행정학보
2012 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
대도시권 정부 간 거버넌스 연구
김찬동
,
이세구
,
이주헌
외 1명
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2009
.12
도시거버넌스 기반 청주시 도시계획체계 분석 : 살고싶은도시만들기 시범도시 사업을 중심으로
백종인
,
반영운
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2010
.06
도시재생 거버넌스의 유형에 따른 도시주거 재생방식에 관한 연구 : 상하이 신티엔디(新天地, Xintiandi)와 티엔지팡(田子防, Tianzifang)사례를 중심으로
정재희
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2012
.04
문화거버넌스 관점에서 본 도시와 기업의 민관협력 문화마케팅 사례 연구 : GM-의정부 전국대학뮤지컬페스티벌을 사례로
공용택
한국문화산업학회 학술대회
2011
.06
수원시 환경수도(저탄소녹색도시)로의 전환과 환경 거버넌스
허태욱
아세아연구
2012
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-359-001025639