지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the amended commercial law of 2011, it is introduced, as a new addition to the already existing four types of companies, a new type of legal company, based upon Limited Liability Company of United States. In the past, the Korean corporate law categorized two companies out of four as Personengesellschaft [a company category where members’ credit is more emphasized than the asset of the company itself which is similar to the United States’ General Partnership(GP)], and the other two companies as Kapitalgesellschaft [a company category where the company’s credit is more emphasized than that of the members’], both of which were influenced by the German legal system. However, in the Anglo-American law, such concept did not exist, and thus efforts to include limited liability company into either Personengesellschaft or Kapitalgesellschaft was not only impossible but fruitless.
One of the reasons that the amendment introduced limited liability company was due to the fact that a new and appropriate type of company was needed in the information based industry, which could not be easily absorbed in the existing company forms. Therefore, it is also necessary to consider these new hybrid company types in defining the legal characteristics of limited liability company. Moreover, it would be more desirable to take into account the characteristics of each provision of limited liability companies, rather than categorizing them into already existing company forms, and to independently search for directions to develop each provision.
One of the reasons that the amendment introduced limited liability company was due to the fact that a new and appropriate type of company was needed in the information based industry, which could not be easily absorbed in the existing company forms. Therefore, it is also necessary to consider these new hybrid company types in defining the legal characteristics of limited liability company. Moreover, it would be more desirable to take into account the characteristics of each provision of limited liability companies, rather than categorizing them into already existing company forms, and to independently search for directions to develop each provision.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 새로운 기업유형으로서의 유한책임제 인적법인
Ⅲ. 인적회사와 물적회사의 구별기준
Ⅳ. 유한책임회사의 법적 성질
Ⅴ. 맺음말
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)
-
대법원 2004. 12. 10. 선고 2004다25123 판결
[1] 상법 제388조에 의하면, 주식회사 이사의 보수는 정관에 그 액을 정하지 아니한 때에는 주주총회의 결의로 이를 정한다고 규정되어 있는바, 이사에 대한 퇴직위로금은 그 직에서 퇴임한 자에 대하여 그 재직 중 직무집행의 대가로 지급되는 보수의 일종으로서 상법 제388조에 규정된 보수에 포함되고, 정
자세히 보기
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-366-001251314