지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
China"s economy has now become the second in the world, and the trade scale has risen to the top three. Recently, Sino-Korean trade increased rapidly. Since 2002, China has become the largest export market of South Korea, and the largest trading nation. For the purpose of the sustained and healthy development of Sino-Korea trade and the strengthening of consumer sovereignty, this study aims to offer a better mutual understanding for the consumer protection legal systems between the two countries.
This paper is to make a research in the basic laws and related consumer protection laws of South Korea and China. Chiefly through comparing the laws concerning visit selling, direct selling and reselling which consumer losses often occur. This paper hopes to make a comparison between South Korea and China according to the existing relevant legal systems on consumer protection. Collecting related documents and a variety of associated journals on consumer protection from the year 2000 to 2008 in the two countries, then analyzing the academic materials, this paper reaches the following conclusions:
First, the consumer protection agency of South Korea is a government based organization, but those of China are half government and half private based organization.
Second, their approaches of handling disputes are different. China doesn"t have the special committee(as Consumer Dispute Settlement Commission in Korea) which has a legal power.
Third, Pyramid Selling, not uni-level selling, is illegal in China. So allowance by a multilevel distributor to a multilevel sales person is also illegal.
Fourth, but Korea Door-to-Door Selling, etc. Act regulates a withdrawal of an offer of contract, China has no. China has only return-goods.
This paper is to make a research in the basic laws and related consumer protection laws of South Korea and China. Chiefly through comparing the laws concerning visit selling, direct selling and reselling which consumer losses often occur. This paper hopes to make a comparison between South Korea and China according to the existing relevant legal systems on consumer protection. Collecting related documents and a variety of associated journals on consumer protection from the year 2000 to 2008 in the two countries, then analyzing the academic materials, this paper reaches the following conclusions:
First, the consumer protection agency of South Korea is a government based organization, but those of China are half government and half private based organization.
Second, their approaches of handling disputes are different. China doesn"t have the special committee(as Consumer Dispute Settlement Commission in Korea) which has a legal power.
Third, Pyramid Selling, not uni-level selling, is illegal in China. So allowance by a multilevel distributor to a multilevel sales person is also illegal.
Fourth, but Korea Door-to-Door Selling, etc. Act regulates a withdrawal of an offer of contract, China has no. China has only return-goods.
목차
〈Abstract〉
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 한중 소비자보호관련법과 소비자보호기관 개괄적 비교
Ⅲ. 한국 「소비자기본법」과 중국 「소비자권익보호법」비교
Ⅳ. 한국 「방문판매등에관한법률」과 중국 「직접판매관리조례」, 「피라미드판매금지조례」비교
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0