메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
배정민 (영남대학교) 김세원 (영남대학교) 김상운 (영남대학교) 송선교 (영남대학교)
저널정보
대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 대한외과학회지 Vol.80 No.1
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
23 - 28 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: In 2010, the new UICC/AJCC TNM classification for gastric cancer was declared. The new classification for gastric cancer has several changes from the 6th classification. We evaluated the prognostic values and differences according to the new UICC/AJCC TNM classification.
Methods: From 2000 to 2004, 1,196 patients who underwent curative resection with D1+β or more lymph node dissection and with 15 or more lymph nodes retrieved were studied retrospectively. We analyzed clinical characteristics and survival outcomes retrospectively from medical records.
Results: According to UICC/AJCC 7th TNM classification, the 5-year survival rate (5YSR) of each group for depth of invasion and node metastasis were significantly different. The 5YSR of stage Ⅱ in 6th classification was 82.4% and the 5YSR of stage Ⅱa and Ⅱb in 7th classification were 92.2% and 82.9%. The 5YSR of stage Ⅲa and Ⅲb in 6th classification were 56.3% and 33.0%. The 5YSR of stage Ⅲa, Ⅲb and Ⅲc in 7th classification were 72.7%, 48.4% and 26.1%. In our Cox regression multivariate analysis, N stage of the 6th UICC/AJCC TNM classification was the main independent prognostic factor.
Conclusion: N stage of the 6th UICC/AJCC TNM classification is a more reliable prognostic factor than N stage of the 7th UICC/AJCC TNM classification. Further study should be performed to confirm the appropriateness of N stage TNM classification for gastric cancer.

목차

서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0