지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to investigate a change in the power of punishment in Ancient society of Korea. Therefore the contents and properties of the punishment of GoJoseon(古朝鮮), Buyeo(夫餘), Koguryo(高句麗) etc. were checked. And Time category was limited to previous period of the Yulryeong (律令) promulgated.
Generlly, the contents of the violation of bans(犯禁) in the most societies including ‘Beomgeum 8 clauses’ (犯禁8條) of GoJoseon(古朝鮮) were murder, injury, theft etc. and these clauses were the most basic and universal elements in the most societies, which regulated members of community. But another aspect in terms of punishment appeared because each society had different folkways(習俗) and customs(慣習) by the natural and social conditions. For example, the shared recognition of atonement for the theft in GoJoseon(古朝鮮), neglecting of the jealous wife’s body in Buyeo(夫餘) etc. Most of these punishments for sins based on the band within the community. But with the advent of increasing power, it controlled the community and executed the punishment compulsorily.
The operation of the power of punishment concretized by the ruling classes in the rites of Younggo(迎鼓) and Dongmaeng(東盟). In the rites, the King was given legitimacy by the God and confirmed rank inside the ruling classes. Every Ga(加) who were representative of each Bu(部) judged a capital offense in the rites though their’s conference. One step further, a standing Aristocratic Conference (貴族會議) made a decision about a matter of Kingdom’s importance. For example, the decision to perform a war, successIon to the throne, penal administration ect.
In the process of a power struggle between King & Co., the King had a monopoly of power. And he promulgated the Y ulryeong(律令) that supported power institutionally. Therefore, promulgation of the Yulryeong(律令) meant that the vertical order for centering the king was needed and this action gave absolutes to the throne.
Generlly, the contents of the violation of bans(犯禁) in the most societies including ‘Beomgeum 8 clauses’ (犯禁8條) of GoJoseon(古朝鮮) were murder, injury, theft etc. and these clauses were the most basic and universal elements in the most societies, which regulated members of community. But another aspect in terms of punishment appeared because each society had different folkways(習俗) and customs(慣習) by the natural and social conditions. For example, the shared recognition of atonement for the theft in GoJoseon(古朝鮮), neglecting of the jealous wife’s body in Buyeo(夫餘) etc. Most of these punishments for sins based on the band within the community. But with the advent of increasing power, it controlled the community and executed the punishment compulsorily.
The operation of the power of punishment concretized by the ruling classes in the rites of Younggo(迎鼓) and Dongmaeng(東盟). In the rites, the King was given legitimacy by the God and confirmed rank inside the ruling classes. Every Ga(加) who were representative of each Bu(部) judged a capital offense in the rites though their’s conference. One step further, a standing Aristocratic Conference (貴族會議) made a decision about a matter of Kingdom’s importance. For example, the decision to perform a war, successIon to the throne, penal administration ect.
In the process of a power struggle between King & Co., the King had a monopoly of power. And he promulgated the Y ulryeong(律令) that supported power institutionally. Therefore, promulgation of the Yulryeong(律令) meant that the vertical order for centering the king was needed and this action gave absolutes to the throne.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 소국 단계 공동체내의 犯禁과 처벌
3. ‘율령’ 반포 이전 刑獄의 決斷
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (6)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-002860434