지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Korean scholars have insisted that Seokdo, which had appeared in Imperial Ordinance No. 41, indicate Dokdo. But after a Japanese newspaper named the San-in Chuo Simpo reported they had discovered a new historical materials that could break the Korean claims, ‘Seokdo=Dokdo’ controversy is running high.
The San-in Chuo Simpo made an assertion that Korean’s claim, ‘Dokdo is a Korean territory’, is broken in the end, quoting a Japanese ordinary man’s internet blog which analyzed Whang-sung Sinmun’s article(13th July, 1906).
Imperial Ordinance No. 41 contains calling for ‘the changing of the name of island, from Ulleungdo to Uldo and the upgrading of the status of dogam to gunsu’. And Tonggam-bu(Japan’s ruling organization to intervene in Imperial ’s domestic politics) established in 1906 had ordered Nae-bu(內部) to give an explanation of when the islets that belongs to Ulleungdo and a small office(군청) had established, to investigate the Ulleungdo’s present state.
After knowing the fact of Tonggam-bu’s order to investigate information on Ulleungdo, Whang-sung Sinmun asserted that the facts Jukdo and Seokdo are contained in Ulleungdo’s jurisdiction, carrying the article which named “the Details of Uldo gun’s Arrangement” again.
However the San-in Chuo Simpo insisted that “if the figures meant the scope of Uldo gun, Korean’s claims are broken because the present Dokdo is located 92 kilometer southeast of Ulleungdo”. Their grounds lie in Whang-sung Sinmun’s article, which says, “Uldo gun’s jurisdiction islets are Ulleungdo, Jukdo and Seokdo. And the scope of Uldo gun is 60 lee(里) from east to west, 40 lee(里) from south to north, and 200 lee (里) in circumference.”
But the distance had been referred in the newspaper must not be interpreted as the jurisdiction scope of Uldo gun, but the scope of Ulleungdo. Since the figures referred above did not make a difference from the present scope of Ulleungdo.
We can prove it by historical documents of Chosun dynasty which Chosun’s investigator directly had surveyed Ulleungdo area by themselves. We should make a profound study why the distance which had not been referred in Imperial Ordinance No. 41 became appeared in Whang-sung Sinmun.
The San-in Chuo Simpo made an assertion that Korean’s claim, ‘Dokdo is a Korean territory’, is broken in the end, quoting a Japanese ordinary man’s internet blog which analyzed Whang-sung Sinmun’s article(13th July, 1906).
Imperial Ordinance No. 41 contains calling for ‘the changing of the name of island, from Ulleungdo to Uldo and the upgrading of the status of dogam to gunsu’. And Tonggam-bu(Japan’s ruling organization to intervene in Imperial ’s domestic politics) established in 1906 had ordered Nae-bu(內部) to give an explanation of when the islets that belongs to Ulleungdo and a small office(군청) had established, to investigate the Ulleungdo’s present state.
After knowing the fact of Tonggam-bu’s order to investigate information on Ulleungdo, Whang-sung Sinmun asserted that the facts Jukdo and Seokdo are contained in Ulleungdo’s jurisdiction, carrying the article which named “the Details of Uldo gun’s Arrangement” again.
However the San-in Chuo Simpo insisted that “if the figures meant the scope of Uldo gun, Korean’s claims are broken because the present Dokdo is located 92 kilometer southeast of Ulleungdo”. Their grounds lie in Whang-sung Sinmun’s article, which says, “Uldo gun’s jurisdiction islets are Ulleungdo, Jukdo and Seokdo. And the scope of Uldo gun is 60 lee(里) from east to west, 40 lee(里) from south to north, and 200 lee (里) in circumference.”
But the distance had been referred in the newspaper must not be interpreted as the jurisdiction scope of Uldo gun, but the scope of Ulleungdo. Since the figures referred above did not make a difference from the present scope of Ulleungdo.
We can prove it by historical documents of Chosun dynasty which Chosun’s investigator directly had surveyed Ulleungdo area by themselves. We should make a profound study why the distance which had not been referred in Imperial Ordinance No. 41 became appeared in Whang-sung Sinmun.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 대한제국 칙령 41호와 ‘석도’의 등장
Ⅲ. 일본의 ‘석도=독도’설 부정 논리
Ⅳ. 한국의 ‘석도=독도’설 논거
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
통계자료로 보는 일제 강점기 울릉도 사회의 양상
해양정책연구
2020 .06
-
일제 강점기 언론에 보도된 울릉도 사회
해양정책연구
2019 .06
-
울릉도 오징어 어획량 변동 특징 및 울릉도 오징어 산업 발전방안
수산해양교육연구
2019 .12
-
동해안 울릉도 해역의 해조군집
수산해양교육연구
2016 .02
-
울릉도해역에서 삼중자망에 의한 어획물의 종조성
수산해양기술연구
2015 .01
-
Species composition of the catches collected by trammel net in the coastal waters off Ulleungdo of Korea
한국수산과학회 양식분과 학술대회
2015 .10
-
수온변화가 울릉도 연안 해조류 생물상에 미치는 영향
해양환경안전학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2018 .01
-
현지조사로 밝혀진 대한제국기 울릉도 현황과 일본의 자원 침탈
해양정책연구
2018 .06
-
울릉도 연안에서 식물플랑크톤 우점종의 현존량 및 생체량 변동
수산해양교육연구
2018 .12
-
ANNUAL REPRODUCTIVE CYCLE OF MUSSLE, Mytilus coruscus (Gould, 1861) ON THE EAST COAST OF ULLEUNGDO ISLAND IN THE EAST SEA OF KOREA
한국수산과학회 양식분과 학술대회
2015 .05
-
울릉도의 귀화식물에 관한 연구
한국환경생태학회지
2007 .01
-
FIRST REPORT ON THE OCCURRENCE OF THE COMB PEN SHELL, Atrina pectinata(LINNAEUS, 1767) (BIVALVIA: PINNIDAE) IN ULLEUNGDO ISLAND IN THE EAST SEA/JAPAN SEA OF KOREA : MOLECULAR IDENTIFICATION OF THE SPECIES USING COI GENE SEQUENCE
한국수산과학회 양식분과 학술대회
2015 .05
-
설비공학 분야의 최근 연구 동향 : 2011년 학회지 논문에 대한 종합적 고찰
설비공학논문집
2012 .06
-
설비공학 분야의 최근 연구 동향 : 2012년 학회지 논문에 대한 종합적 고찰
설비공학논문집
2013 .06
-
동결건조 살구분말 첨가량에 따른 머핀의 품질 특성
한국식품영양과학회지
2013 .06
-
올리브 잎과 월계수 잎의 화학적 특성
한국식품영양과학회지
2005 .04
-
기독교회의사회적신조
신학지남
1933 .05
-
Foundational Principles Guiding Kingdom Business as a Final Runner for the Great Commission
선교와 신학
2012 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
동아시아 공동체와 담론 전쟁 : 한국 언론의 동북공정과 독도분쟁 재구성
김성해
언론과 사회
2013
.08
1951년 샌프란시스코 평화조약에서 독도의 영토 처리 과정에 관한 연구
이석우
동북아역사논총
2005
.10
『유럽의 독도 인식』 : (민유기·최재희·최호근·민경현, 동북아역사재단, 2011)
윤유숙
영토해양연구
2011
.12
‘울도군 절목’의 발굴과 그 의미 : 대한제국 칙령 제41호 선포에 따른 울릉도와 독도에 관한 행정관할 증거
김영수
영토해양연구
2011
.12
광합성 세균 첨가 사료 급이에 따른 흰다리새우 성장, 장내 세균 분석
남혜리
,
임종악
,
김춘철
외 5명
한국수산과학회 양식분과 학술대회
2023
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-454-001647962