지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A comprehensive set of laws dealing with the seas known as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) entered into force on November 16, 1994. After the entry of force of UNCLOS, some issues on maritime delimitation(i.e., the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and the outer limit of Continental Shelf became a focal point for many countries. This also raises the issue of how to delimit overlapping zones and how to define the lines that will be the maritime boundary for the States concerned. People’s Republic of China (hereafter China) asserts that “it is unrealistic for countries to apply only one method of delimitation” when they seek to determine their maritime boundaries. Thus, the focal point of this study is the emphasis that it is very crucial for China how to applicate the maritime delimitation methods to its maritime space.
In that respect, this study tries to scrutinize China’s laws and practice regarding its maritime boundary delimitation, especially focusing on the Chinese (broken) U-shaped line, natural prolongation of land territory, and equidistance approach (isometric latitude or equitable latitude). The (broken) U-shaped line as the traditional Chinese maritime boundary in the South China Sea and the method of straight baseline to all the coasts of China are controversial in international law so that they may be queried whether China’s practice conforms with the relevant provisions of UNCLOS. Further, regionally China has to negotiate with its neighboring countries on the maritime boundary delimitation of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf. In staking out their respective unilateral claims, China applied the principle of natural prolongation of land territory where its maritime boundaries should reflect the natural prolongation of its land territory to the outer limit. In the course of negotiations, the States concerned may apply any one or a combination of delimitation methods appropriate for arriving at an equitable solution between adjacent or opposite countries.
In conclusion, while this study addresses international legal aspects of maritime delimitation method of China, it seeks together to assess what it takes to be ‘equitable solution’ to China on maritime boundary delimitation. It is especially so that the application in the East Asian region will be both a testing ground and a show case of China’s vision of “shelving disputes to engage in joint development with regard to contentious territories”.
In that respect, this study tries to scrutinize China’s laws and practice regarding its maritime boundary delimitation, especially focusing on the Chinese (broken) U-shaped line, natural prolongation of land territory, and equidistance approach (isometric latitude or equitable latitude). The (broken) U-shaped line as the traditional Chinese maritime boundary in the South China Sea and the method of straight baseline to all the coasts of China are controversial in international law so that they may be queried whether China’s practice conforms with the relevant provisions of UNCLOS. Further, regionally China has to negotiate with its neighboring countries on the maritime boundary delimitation of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf. In staking out their respective unilateral claims, China applied the principle of natural prolongation of land territory where its maritime boundaries should reflect the natural prolongation of its land territory to the outer limit. In the course of negotiations, the States concerned may apply any one or a combination of delimitation methods appropriate for arriving at an equitable solution between adjacent or opposite countries.
In conclusion, while this study addresses international legal aspects of maritime delimitation method of China, it seeks together to assess what it takes to be ‘equitable solution’ to China on maritime boundary delimitation. It is especially so that the application in the East Asian region will be both a testing ground and a show case of China’s vision of “shelving disputes to engage in joint development with regard to contentious territories”.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중국의 해양정책과 해양경계
Ⅲ. 중국의 해양경계 획정방법의 검토
Ⅳ. 결론 및 정책적 시사점
참고문헌
참고문헌 (51)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
우리나라 영해기선 관리의 개선방안 연구
해양정책연구
2015 .06
-
Some Delimitation Issues in the Maritime Areas Surrounding the Korean Peninsula
해양정책연구
1996 .06
-
중국의 해상경계 설정과 우리나라에의 시사점
월간 해양수산
2007 .05
-
해수면 상승이 해양경계와 섬에 미치는 법적 쟁점 연구
해양정책연구
2013 .12
-
해양 및 수산자원 관리를 위한 해양경계정보 구축방안에 관한 연구
수산해양교육연구
2005 .12
-
A Study on the Strategy of Establishing China Maritime Performing Party System
한국항해항만학회지
2012 .01
-
Fisheries Cooperation and Maritime Delimitation Issuesbetween North Korea and Its Neighboring Countries
해양정책연구
2001 .06
-
중국의 남중국해 해양관할권 강화정책과 실행에 관한 연구
해양정책연구
2018 .06
-
중국의 해상교통안전법
수산해양교육연구
1993 .08
-
‘해양강국 대한민국’의 국가브랜드화 : 2012여수세계박람회의 소프트 파워 전략
해양정책연구
2010 .06
-
한국 해양사의 재인식과 새로운 유형의 ‘해양역사인물’ 찾기
해양정책연구
2017 .07
-
주요 해양사고에 따른 국제 해사안전정책 변화에 대한 연구
해양환경안전학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2017 .01
-
중국-베트남간 통킹만 어업협정 및 해양경계협정 사례에 관한 소고
해양정책연구
2006 .06
-
지방자치단체간 해상경계분쟁의 실태 및 쟁점
해양환경안전학회지
2002 .01
-
선박승무원의 해사안전문화 인식이 해사안전활동에 미치는 영향
수산해양교육연구
2020 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-454-001647922