지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper looks into the need for discourses on Translation Studies and their significance from an epistemological perspective. In particular, we take a look at the epistemological approach of Jean-Rene Ladmiral, a French translation scholar and philosopher.
The first part of this paper reviews a conceptual definition of ‘epistemology’ as it applies to Translation Studies, which is to articulate the nature of translation-related knowledge or perception. Epistemology herein refers to a comprehensive concept covering such issues as the types of knowledge pertaining to translation, as well as the methods or procedures for obtaining such knowledge, and their feasibility, legitimacy, and rationale.
The second part of this paper looks into the epistemological approach of Ladmiral, who is presently one of the most active scholars in the field. In particular, we explore the meaning of four types of Translation Studies proposed by Ladmiral: prescriptive or normative, descriptive, inductive or scientific, and productive.
In conclusion, this section articulates the significance and limitations of Ladmiral"s epistemological approach. It explores his theory and its implications as an alternative to William Chesterman"s approach, which mainly pursues scientificity in Translation Studies.
The first part of this paper reviews a conceptual definition of ‘epistemology’ as it applies to Translation Studies, which is to articulate the nature of translation-related knowledge or perception. Epistemology herein refers to a comprehensive concept covering such issues as the types of knowledge pertaining to translation, as well as the methods or procedures for obtaining such knowledge, and their feasibility, legitimacy, and rationale.
The second part of this paper looks into the epistemological approach of Ladmiral, who is presently one of the most active scholars in the field. In particular, we explore the meaning of four types of Translation Studies proposed by Ladmiral: prescriptive or normative, descriptive, inductive or scientific, and productive.
In conclusion, this section articulates the significance and limitations of Ladmiral"s epistemological approach. It explores his theory and its implications as an alternative to William Chesterman"s approach, which mainly pursues scientificity in Translation Studies.
목차
1. 서론
2. 번역인식론이란 무엇인가?
3. 라드미랄은 어떤 번역인식론을 수행하는가?
4. 라드미랄의 번역인식론과 그 쟁점
5. 결론을 대신하며
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
2. [단행본] - 윤성우 / 2006 / 번역론 / 철학과현실사
3. [단행본] - 윤성우 / 2009 / 낯선 것으로부터 오는 시련 / 철학과현실사
4. [단행본] - Mounin, Georges / 2002 / 번역의 이론적 문제점 / 고려대학교 출판부
6. [단행본] - Israel, Fortunato / 2003 / 통번역과 등가 / 한국문화사
7. [단행본] - Balliu,Christian / 2004 / Jean-René Ladmiral: une certaine philosophie de la traduction / Revue de l'institut catholique de Paris : 51 ~ 57
3. [단행본] - 윤성우 / 2009 / 낯선 것으로부터 오는 시련 / 철학과현실사
4. [단행본] - Mounin, Georges / 2002 / 번역의 이론적 문제점 / 고려대학교 출판부
6. [단행본] - Israel, Fortunato / 2003 / 통번역과 등가 / 한국문화사
7. [단행본] - Balliu,Christian / 2004 / Jean-René Ladmiral: une certaine philosophie de la traduction / Revue de l'institut catholique de Paris : 51 ~ 57
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-701-001517221