지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2007.12
- 수록면
- 111 - 138 (28page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Can life sharing activities such as ‘organ donation’ and ‘blood donation’ be justified for curing emergent patients or physically disable person? Can biblical basis for these be found? These are the essential questions to be raised so that we may have a theological basis for life sharing activities. The Bible, of course, does not contain terminologies such as ‘organ donation’ or ‘blood donation.’ However, I argue that ‘serving’ or ’sharing’ which is an outer expression of neighborly love or brotherly love can have a theological basis. The purpose of this study is to search for life terminologies used in the Old Testament and one of its translation, LXX, then investigate two core terms ‘psyche’(ψυχ?) and ‘zoe’(ζω?) used in the New Testament. With researching these, I will try to figure out a proper direction for life sharing and it biblical basis.
The New Testament does not show any special interest in the neutral concept of life. Rather, the term ‘life’ is used with relation to human salvation in constrast to ‘death.’ Although each book of the Testaments has different emphasis, ‘life’ indicates not simply being alive or physical vitality, but the reality of those saved by believing Jesus Christ, the son of God, as if ‘death’ indicates not a simple status of physical death, but a status under the power of sin. ‘Life’ in the New Testament is not determined by its span, but by the quality of life. Thereby the message that if anybody loses his or her life for the Lord and His Gospel will be saved in right relationship with God is the central teaching on life.
Presupposing the biblical message above, the characteristics of the two terms on ‘life’ in the New Testament can be summarized as follow. First, the term ‘zoe’(ζω?) is used soteriologically for sinful man’s salvation on the one hand, and on the other hand, it is used eschatologically in terms of eternal life after the resurrection of the dead. Secondly, the term, ‘psyche’(ψυχ?) is used to mean ‘lively existence of man.’ Compared soteriological and eschatological term, ‘zoe’(ζω?) with anthropological term ‘psyche’(ψυχ?), it is ‘psyche’(ψυχ?) rather than ‘zoe’(ζω?) which can be applied for biblical basis for life sharing activities. Since Jesus Christ has laid His life for redemptive sacrifice and became a model for serving others, Christians who gained His life by believing in Him also can serve others by sharing their lives(psychai). This can be a proper biblical basis for ‘organ donation’ or ‘blood donation.’ Biblical life sharing is not biological nor medical ’self division’, but practice of neighborly love which is shown by the death of Jesus Christ and its embodiment. When life sharing activities like ’organ donation’ and ‘blood donation’ become godly love shared in Jesus Christ, these will be missional activities.
The New Testament does not show any special interest in the neutral concept of life. Rather, the term ‘life’ is used with relation to human salvation in constrast to ‘death.’ Although each book of the Testaments has different emphasis, ‘life’ indicates not simply being alive or physical vitality, but the reality of those saved by believing Jesus Christ, the son of God, as if ‘death’ indicates not a simple status of physical death, but a status under the power of sin. ‘Life’ in the New Testament is not determined by its span, but by the quality of life. Thereby the message that if anybody loses his or her life for the Lord and His Gospel will be saved in right relationship with God is the central teaching on life.
Presupposing the biblical message above, the characteristics of the two terms on ‘life’ in the New Testament can be summarized as follow. First, the term ‘zoe’(ζω?) is used soteriologically for sinful man’s salvation on the one hand, and on the other hand, it is used eschatologically in terms of eternal life after the resurrection of the dead. Secondly, the term, ‘psyche’(ψυχ?) is used to mean ‘lively existence of man.’ Compared soteriological and eschatological term, ‘zoe’(ζω?) with anthropological term ‘psyche’(ψυχ?), it is ‘psyche’(ψυχ?) rather than ‘zoe’(ζω?) which can be applied for biblical basis for life sharing activities. Since Jesus Christ has laid His life for redemptive sacrifice and became a model for serving others, Christians who gained His life by believing in Him also can serve others by sharing their lives(psychai). This can be a proper biblical basis for ‘organ donation’ or ‘blood donation.’ Biblical life sharing is not biological nor medical ’self division’, but practice of neighborly love which is shown by the death of Jesus Christ and its embodiment. When life sharing activities like ’organ donation’ and ‘blood donation’ become godly love shared in Jesus Christ, these will be missional activities.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 구약성경에서 생명
Ⅲ. 신약성경에서 ‘생명’(ζω?)
Ⅳ. 신약성경에서 ‘목숨’(ψυχ?)
Ⅴ. 나가는 말
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
뇌사자 장기기증의 윤리적 조건과 문화적 과제
기독교사회윤리
2007 .01
-
Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind
한국기독교신학논총
2004 .10
-
생명에 대한 존재론적 인식과 생명미학적 정치
철학탐구
2014 .11
-
Life
Korea Journal
1972 .08
-
고등학생 혈액 기부의 내적·외적 동기 요인 분석
윤리연구
2019 .01
-
생명과그의의(The life and it's meaning)
신학지남
1930 .05
-
A Short Life Of Christ
신학지남
1969 .06
-
평생교육의 관점에서 본 생명 : 생애주기(life-cycle)를 중심으로
인간연구
2011 .01
-
신약성경의 생명 사상에 대한 고찰
선교와 신학
2008 .08
-
‘삶의 질’과 ‘생명의 신성함’ 생명윤리
인간연구
2007 .07
-
신약성서와 관련문헌을 중심으로 고찰한 장기기증의 근거
장신논단
2006 .09
-
동화에 나타난 선물의 의미와 가치 탐색
문학교육학
2010 .01
-
창조와 새 창조 : 생태신학적 그리스도론의 시도
Catholic Theology and Thought
2012 .06
-
예수님은 모든 것을 다 아셨는가?
신학전망
1971 .03
-
반생명적 청소년 문화를 극복하기 위한 기독교교육의 과제
기독교교육정보
2014 .06
-
마가복음 7:20-23에 나타난 인간의 마음과 Imitatio Christi의 길
신학과 목회
2015 .11
-
비영리조직의 자원봉사활동특성 및 정기후원에 영향을 미치는 요인 - 대한적십자사 자원봉사자를 중심으로 -
유라시아연구
2020 .01
-
신약성경신학의 본질과 방법론
신학정론
2005 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-230-001301912