지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.12
- 수록면
- 111 - 140 (30page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Regarding the relationship of the merchant"s lease, in addition to the relationships of landlord and tenant, tents and prior tenants, and the rent deposit among the tenants and others, the reality is that there are many incidents where money is being given and received as nominal Foregift.
However as seen from the tragedy case in Yongsan, in some cases, the amount of the Foregift is as much as several hundreds of millions of won and from the evidence that there are numerous cases of disputes regarding the Foregift during lease disputes, it can be concluded that there must be laws regulating the Foregift unlike the western countries where they have the freedom of contract and the government leaves it to the tenants and landlords. By suggesting to improve the cases based on the business building lease protection act, as the Foregift is referred by the precedent first, the Foregift is defined through dividing them into facilities Foregift, places Foregift, and sales Foregift. And in order for the merchants to recover the costs of their investments in such as the Foregift, make the claim reimbursement of expenses a mandatory provision, do not allow the landlord to decline without good reasons in case of transfer of the lease, and if there is a declination, then they must follow the directions of the court, and make it so the duration of the contract must be at least 1 year and the maximum period of contract renewal requirement must be 7 years. These are some of the suggested improvements in the business building lease protection act.
These assertions (especially, the part where they must be reimbursed for the Foregift they didn"t even paid for) could be viewed as being defending only the merchant, the lease holder"s point of view but in western countries (England and France), are already compensating and as a nation, they have the responsibility to promote the commercial activities of the merchant. Additionally, although the merchant is active for his commercial reasons, these business activities of the merchants have contributed greatly to the national economy so when all these things are comprehensively considered, this is more than fair for each others. Therefore, by no means, this is too much for the leaseholder.
However as seen from the tragedy case in Yongsan, in some cases, the amount of the Foregift is as much as several hundreds of millions of won and from the evidence that there are numerous cases of disputes regarding the Foregift during lease disputes, it can be concluded that there must be laws regulating the Foregift unlike the western countries where they have the freedom of contract and the government leaves it to the tenants and landlords. By suggesting to improve the cases based on the business building lease protection act, as the Foregift is referred by the precedent first, the Foregift is defined through dividing them into facilities Foregift, places Foregift, and sales Foregift. And in order for the merchants to recover the costs of their investments in such as the Foregift, make the claim reimbursement of expenses a mandatory provision, do not allow the landlord to decline without good reasons in case of transfer of the lease, and if there is a declination, then they must follow the directions of the court, and make it so the duration of the contract must be at least 1 year and the maximum period of contract renewal requirement must be 7 years. These are some of the suggested improvements in the business building lease protection act.
These assertions (especially, the part where they must be reimbursed for the Foregift they didn"t even paid for) could be viewed as being defending only the merchant, the lease holder"s point of view but in western countries (England and France), are already compensating and as a nation, they have the responsibility to promote the commercial activities of the merchant. Additionally, although the merchant is active for his commercial reasons, these business activities of the merchants have contributed greatly to the national economy so when all these things are comprehensively considered, this is more than fair for each others. Therefore, by no means, this is too much for the leaseholder.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 權利金의 槪念定立
Ⅳ. 우리法制에서의 權利金保護規定과 問題點
Ⅴ. 權利金保護를 위한 改善方案
Ⅵ. 結論
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
상가건물임대차상 권리금계약의 통제
한양법학
2012 .11
-
商街建物賃借人의 權利金에 관한 硏究
법학연구
2006 .05
-
영업용 건물의 권리금에 관한 관습법의 변경과 권리금의 법적성질 및 반환
외법논집
2012 .01
-
상가건물임대차보호법의 문제점과 개선방안
한국지적정보학회지
2003 .12
-
商街建物賃貸借保護法의 문제점과 改善方案에 關한 考察
기업법연구
2005 .03
-
상가건물임대차보호법상 근대민법 3대원칙의 수정원리의 적정성에 관한 검토
홍익법학
2018 .01
-
상가건물임대차보호법상 권리금 보호 규정에 관한 고찰 : 손해배상의 범위를 중심으로
저스티스
2017 .10
-
상가임차인의 계약갱신요구권과 묵시적 갱신의 관계 : 대법원 2010. 6. 10. 선고 2009다64307 판결
법학연구
2012 .11
-
상가건물임대차보호법상 문제점과 개선방향에 관한 연구
한국지적정보학회지
2008 .06
-
상가건물 임대차에서의 권리금 보호에 관한 연구
공공사회연구
2015 .02
-
住宅賃貸借保護法上 對抗力과 確定日字에 관한 再檢討
한양법학
2013 .11
-
권리금에 관한 연구
중앙법학
2010 .12
-
「상가건물임대차보호법」 제9조 제2항 법정임대차관계 고찰
홍익법학
2019 .01
-
상가건물임대차에 관한 연구
재산법연구
2006 .01
-
주택임대관리서비스가 임차인의 만족도 및 재계약 의도에 미치는 영향 연구
주거환경
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001270588