지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study analyzed the process of establishing Wonmyo(the Royal’s private Ancestral Shrine) system and examined the characteristic of it, especially related to Munsojeon. Wonmyo was built to respect the late Kings as if they were alive. In the early Choson dynasty, Wonmyo was built separate one king from another. While the only one Munsojeon was established instead of plural Wonmyo during the reign of King Sejong, because it had trouble to build Wonmyo continuous. Spirit tablet were enshrined instead of portrait in Munsojeon, and Confician ceremony was done deviating from the Buddhist. Spirit tablets of Taejo and four generation ancestor of present king were enshrined in Munsojeon, and King Sejong strictly restricted the number of spirit tablets as 5.
The system of Munsojeon was changed during the reign of King Seongjong. He became a king after death of his uncle Yejong. He bestowed the titled of King on his real father in the 7th year, and then Spirit tablet of his father was enshrined in Chongmyo(the Royal Ancestral Shrine). But Spirit tablet of his real father was enshrined in Yeoneunjeon, a kind of Wonmyo instead of Munsojeon, for he called Yejong his father. This is deviate from principle restricting direct 4 generations due to enshrining his uncle, not his father.
Myongjong was younger brother of Injong, so he intended to enshrine his elder brother in Yeoneunjeon not in Munsojeon. But Sarim(Neo-Confucian literati) insisted Injong be enshrined in Munsojeon because Myongjong had to regard Injong as his father. They acclaimed it was defined not blood lineage but kingship lineage. At last Injong was enshrined in Yeoneunjeon due to powerful insistence of the King’s mother. This debate was continued during the reign of King Seonjo. At that time Sarim gained in power, they claimed kingship lineage was more important than blood lineage on the enshrinement. So Injong and Myongjong were enshrined in Munsojeon. As a result, Munsojeon system changed to enshrine spirit tablet from blood lineage to kingship lineage. But basically Sarim denied the system of Munsojeon, because of duplicity of Jongmyo and Munsojeon and too many sacrificial rites. So After Munsojeon was burned away during Imjinwaeran(Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1392), it was not rebuilt forever.
The system of Munsojeon was changed during the reign of King Seongjong. He became a king after death of his uncle Yejong. He bestowed the titled of King on his real father in the 7th year, and then Spirit tablet of his father was enshrined in Chongmyo(the Royal Ancestral Shrine). But Spirit tablet of his real father was enshrined in Yeoneunjeon, a kind of Wonmyo instead of Munsojeon, for he called Yejong his father. This is deviate from principle restricting direct 4 generations due to enshrining his uncle, not his father.
Myongjong was younger brother of Injong, so he intended to enshrine his elder brother in Yeoneunjeon not in Munsojeon. But Sarim(Neo-Confucian literati) insisted Injong be enshrined in Munsojeon because Myongjong had to regard Injong as his father. They acclaimed it was defined not blood lineage but kingship lineage. At last Injong was enshrined in Yeoneunjeon due to powerful insistence of the King’s mother. This debate was continued during the reign of King Seonjo. At that time Sarim gained in power, they claimed kingship lineage was more important than blood lineage on the enshrinement. So Injong and Myongjong were enshrined in Munsojeon. As a result, Munsojeon system changed to enshrine spirit tablet from blood lineage to kingship lineage. But basically Sarim denied the system of Munsojeon, because of duplicity of Jongmyo and Munsojeon and too many sacrificial rites. So After Munsojeon was burned away during Imjinwaeran(Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1392), it was not rebuilt forever.
목차
요약
1. 머리말
2. 文昭殿 이전 原廟의 설립 현황
3. 文昭殿의 설립과 五廟制로의 운영
4. 文昭殿의 五廟制 논쟁
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
성종 대 의경왕의 추숭과 연은전의 운영
장서각
2018 .10
-
고려중기 예종ㆍ인종의 통치와 관료집단의 성격
한국인물사연구
2007 .09
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
성종-중종대 農桑관련 국가제례의 변화양상과 親祭
역사와실학
2010 .11
-
연산군대 廟制論의 논의과정과 그 의미
역사와경계
2006 .09
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
-
新羅 下代 王室의 祭禮와 元聖王 追崇의 정치사회적 의의
사학연구
2012 .12
-
고구려 王系의 성립과정과 시기
한국고대사연구
2016 .09
-
19세기 眞殿 및 御眞奉安處 운영에 대한 연구
장서각
2011 .10
-
조선전기 종묘 ‘同堂異室制’의 비판과 重建논쟁
한국사학보
2009 .08
-
高麗 仁宗朝 國學生들의 정치적 활동 : 國學生들이 올린 上疏 및 上書에 대한 검토
역사학보
2004 .06
-
동제당 철마 봉안 사례 연구 : 대장장이와의 관련성을 중심으로
한국민속학
2001 .12
-
朝鮮初期 宗親職制의 정비와 운영
한국사연구
2010 .12
-
조선시대 왕의 이중적 재현 : 인조대를 중심으로
한국학연구
2012 .03
-
新羅 宗廟制의 受容과 그 意味
역사학보
2002 .12
-
1802년 순조의 嘉禮에 나타난 국왕의 辛行 연구
장서각
2005 .12
-
고려 예종대 胡宗旦의 행적과 평가
한국민족문화
2017 .08
-
納塔經典의 시대적 變遷考
불교학보
2012 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-380-001186916