개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With the concept of "Arumdaum" and "Goeum" Mut is one of the categories consisting of Korean aesthetic consciousness. The important issues in the study are following. First, the relation of Mut with Mat is newly studied. Second, Mut as an untranslatable concept is reviewed adequately on the basis of earlier theories. Third, the study reviews "Mut" as a practical idea or education objective. Considering these themes the present study has been completed by checking out earlier theories.
Unlike the existing studies the study reviewed the following questions. The first question is the relation between Mut and Mat. These etymological or generative relations are analyzed with the pragmatic or semantic, aesthetic relations. The study has reviewed the correlative relations of all the complex words implication Mat and Mut. The usage of Mut in the 1890s appeared in the words of "Mutdaero." There is no clear evidence that the word of Mut has derived from the transformed word of Mat.Although etymological relation of Mut with Mat is used with unrelated meanings besides aesthetic feeling, aesthetic consciousness, tastes, and Heongchi, it can be admitted. Second, is Mut a Korean characteristic category of aesthetic consciousness? That is to say that Mut cannot be translated into other languages, since it is a unique Korean taste. Mut is not characteristic beauty of Korea due to such a reason.
However, through the debate of Mut and Mat in 1950s, the fact that Mut is Mat has come to a new theory. Since then many arguments that Mut is a pronoun of Korean has been suggested. Against those theoretical backgrounds, Mut of Korea represents Korean aesthetic consciousness with an ellipsis.
In brief, the word of Mut basically represents comprehensive aesthetic consciousness, but in the context of theory the word can be used in suggesting the Korean characteristics of aesthetic consciousness. Joh Jihoon discussed aesthetic contents of Mut in three kinds of viewpoints: (1) Mut as formal beauty, (2) Mut as expressive beauty, and Mut as mental beauty. This classification was divided into internal motivation of art work and creative motif correlated with aesthetic consciousness of Mut.
Unlike the existing studies the study reviewed the following questions. The first question is the relation between Mut and Mat. These etymological or generative relations are analyzed with the pragmatic or semantic, aesthetic relations. The study has reviewed the correlative relations of all the complex words implication Mat and Mut. The usage of Mut in the 1890s appeared in the words of "Mutdaero." There is no clear evidence that the word of Mut has derived from the transformed word of Mat.Although etymological relation of Mut with Mat is used with unrelated meanings besides aesthetic feeling, aesthetic consciousness, tastes, and Heongchi, it can be admitted. Second, is Mut a Korean characteristic category of aesthetic consciousness? That is to say that Mut cannot be translated into other languages, since it is a unique Korean taste. Mut is not characteristic beauty of Korea due to such a reason.
However, through the debate of Mut and Mat in 1950s, the fact that Mut is Mat has come to a new theory. Since then many arguments that Mut is a pronoun of Korean has been suggested. Against those theoretical backgrounds, Mut of Korea represents Korean aesthetic consciousness with an ellipsis.
In brief, the word of Mut basically represents comprehensive aesthetic consciousness, but in the context of theory the word can be used in suggesting the Korean characteristics of aesthetic consciousness. Joh Jihoon discussed aesthetic contents of Mut in three kinds of viewpoints: (1) Mut as formal beauty, (2) Mut as expressive beauty, and Mut as mental beauty. This classification was divided into internal motivation of art work and creative motif correlated with aesthetic consciousness of Mut.
목차
Ⅰ. 연구 주제
Ⅱ. 멋에 대한 초기 논의들
Ⅲ. 멋의 논쟁
Ⅳ. 조지훈의 멋의 연구
Ⅴ. 재검토할 문제
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
서양의 미적 체계 구성 방법론
민족미학
2007 .12
-
참된 미의식
민족미학
2003 .07
-
태평무의 미의식에 관한 연구
대한무용학회논문집
2014 .01
-
현대사회와 무용의 미학적 관련성
대한무용학회논문집
2006 .01
-
스포츠의 미적 가능성
움직임의 철학: 한국체육철학회지
2016 .12
-
한국 춤에 나타난 미의식
무용예술학연구
2002 .01
-
신라의 미의식 연구
한국의류학회지
2013 .01
-
모호성(模糊性)의 미적 특성을 통한 심미경계 표현
미술문화연구
2020 .09
-
태권도 회전발차기 실천자의 미적 체험 구조
한국스포츠학회
2019 .01
-
한국무용에서의 미학적 논의
대한무용학회논문집
2005 .01
-
한국미의 자연성에 대한 환경미학적 접근
민족미학
2005 .07
-
The Aesthetic Consciousness of White Color latent in Korean Costume
한국색채학회 학술대회
2006 .01
-
의복에서의 조형미와 유행 평가연구
한국의류학회지
1990 .01
-
형용사에 내재된 시각적 미의식에 관한 연구
한국공간디자인학회 논문집
2014 .01
-
여대생의 미의식 수준에 따른 화장품 구매평가 기준과 화장품 쇼핑성향의 상관관계에 관한 연구
한국인체미용예술학회지
2015 .01
-
“즐거운 과학” - 음악미학과 음악분석을 다시 생각함
音.樂.學
2009 .01
-
미용서비스 종사자의 미적 노동(Aesthetic Labor) 분석 : 근거 이론적 접근을 중심으로
한국디자인문화학회지
2015 .03
-
예술의 ‘참여’ 개념과 춤의 연행성 연구 : 아놀드 벌리언트의 개념을 바탕으로
민족미학
2012 .12
-
미학적 앎의 양식에 근거한 미술적 지식의 교육적 함의 - Eisner의 미학적 인식론을 중심으로 -
조형교육
2009 .01
-
무용미학의 제문제들에 관한 고찰 ( 1 )
한국여성체육학회지
1992 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-601-001170923