메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
Inkyo Cheong (Inha University) Min Ha Lee (KIEP)
저널정보
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회 Inha University and University of Toyama
발행연도
2009.8
수록면
85 - 110 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Among various distinctive formulations that have been developed simultaneously in East Asia as of 2009, this paper selected three major paths, ASEAN+3, ASEAN+6 and APEC, to quantitatively examine the potential economic impacts of the economic integration with a CGE model. In doing so, this paper confirmed previous findings including the magnitude of economic impact being proportional to the size of the integration body and the existence of trade diversion effects within any trade bloc. The subsequent KORUS and Korea-EU FTA imposition upon the built CGE base models further verified the effects of hub-and-spoke-ism in East Asia. Jointly, the simulation results implied that the economic impacts of a trade arrangement heavily depend on the subject economy"s reliance on trade with the participating states. Such findings were also true under the hub-and-spoke paradigm in that the impacts were found to be directly proportional to the accrued trade balance of the subject spoke country with both the hub state and the hub-destination. This could have been exaggerated as the scope of this study was limited to East Asia where the extent of damage on the spoke countries over the hub state"s extra-regional trade arrangements may be greater than other regions due to its exceptionally high reliance on external markets. The significant gap between the expected effects of KORUS and Korea-EU FTA, however, strongly supported this theory; KORUS FTA was found to be more influential on all East Asian countries, whose top export destination is the US.

목차

Contents
Tables and Figures
Abstract
Introduction
CGE Analysis on East Asian Regionalization
ASEAN+3 FTA vs. ASEAN+6 FTA vs. APEC FTA
KORUS and Korea-EU FTAs: With or Without?
Beyond the 2008 Global Credit Crunch
Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix: Methodology

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-326-001456142