메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Hyun Jung Kim (Hankuk University)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.11 Number.3
발행연도
2011.9
수록면
465 - 495 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Kim, Hyun Jung. 2011. Investigating the rationality of using composite scores for a speaking placement assessment. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 11-3, 465-495. In second language performance assessments, analytic scoring is often preferred over holistic scoring in evaluating learners' test performances due to its advantages (e.g., detailed information about examinee ability and raters' separate attention to different components of the test construct). However, a single composite score is often used to infer learners' language ability, even in cases where their test performances have been rated using an analytic scoring rubric. Using a composite score may result in information loss regarding learners' ability and may mislead test users (e.g., teachers) in their decision-making. Therefore, this study investigated the reliability of the analytic ratings as well as the composite scores of a speaking placement test used in a community English program. A total of 215 incoming students took a speaking placement test, which included six semi-direct, computer-delivered tasks (three independent and three integrated). Students' recorded performances were scored by two independent raters on five analytic rating scales. An analysis of the analytic ratings using multivariate generalizability theory found high dependability of the speaking ratings and supported the use of composite scores. The findings suggest that a composite score reflecting multicomponential speaking ability can be reasonably used for placement decisions without being affected by other sources of score variation (e.g., tasks and task types).

목차

1. Introduction
2. Literature review
3. Method
4. Results
5. Discussion and Conclusions
References
Appendix A Speaking placement test
Appendix B Analytic scoring rubric

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-740-000750038