지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper deals with a practical case which contians some important constitutional issues-unconstitutionality of the Adultery Clause, freedom of occupation, principle of proportionality, equal protection, legislative facts, unconstitutionality in application, etc. A CPA(Certified Public Accountant) was sentenced to 1 year in prison with a 2-year suspended sentence for the Adultery, Article 241 of the Criminal Act at the trial court, and that was uphold by the Supreme Court. As a result of that judgement, he is subject to be cancelled his CPA license, furthermore he shall not be able to be occupied in the CPA service. It is caused by CPA Act provision: in the case of that Any CPA is sentenced to be in prison(including its suspension), he shall be cancelled and disqualified for his CPA license during suspension period(in this case 2-year) and 2 years after the termination of the suspension.
Here comes the brief conclusion of this paper.
(ⅰ) Article 241 of the Criminal Act which prohibits adultery shall be ruled ⅰ unconstitutional as a violation of the principle against excessive restriction because it provides incarceration as the only form of punishment without allowing more moderate forms of penalty, for instance, fine.
(ⅱ) The CPA Act provisions which provide cancellation of license and disqualification shall be ruled unconstitutional as a violation of the principle of proportionality because of the respect that if any CPA is sentenced to be in prison (including its suspension) regardless of the sort of crime, he is supposed to be cancelled and disqualified for his CPA license during a fixed period.
(ⅲ) Above-mentioned CPA Act provisions have not rational reason for justifying discrimination in comparison with a doctor, a pharmacist, and a Customs broker who shall be cancelled and disqualified for their licenses only when they are sentenced to be in prison for committing job-related crimes. On top of that, the CPA Act provisions don't have strictly proportional relationship between the object of discrimination and the means for achieving the object.
(ⅳ) In the litigious perspective, Nation(Legislators) shall demonstrate that above-mentioned restriction is effective for securing the integrity of and people's reliance to the CPA's duty.
(ⅴ) In this case, although the CPA's marrige came to actual rupture, he had to be sentenced to in prison (including its suspension), as a result, authority-concerned has to necessarily cancel his license. Thus, it is desirable for the Constitutional Court to rule that “the cancellation and disqualification provisions of the CPA Act are unconstitutional, when applied to this applicant.”
Here comes the brief conclusion of this paper.
(ⅰ) Article 241 of the Criminal Act which prohibits adultery shall be ruled ⅰ unconstitutional as a violation of the principle against excessive restriction because it provides incarceration as the only form of punishment without allowing more moderate forms of penalty, for instance, fine.
(ⅱ) The CPA Act provisions which provide cancellation of license and disqualification shall be ruled unconstitutional as a violation of the principle of proportionality because of the respect that if any CPA is sentenced to be in prison (including its suspension) regardless of the sort of crime, he is supposed to be cancelled and disqualified for his CPA license during a fixed period.
(ⅲ) Above-mentioned CPA Act provisions have not rational reason for justifying discrimination in comparison with a doctor, a pharmacist, and a Customs broker who shall be cancelled and disqualified for their licenses only when they are sentenced to be in prison for committing job-related crimes. On top of that, the CPA Act provisions don't have strictly proportional relationship between the object of discrimination and the means for achieving the object.
(ⅳ) In the litigious perspective, Nation(Legislators) shall demonstrate that above-mentioned restriction is effective for securing the integrity of and people's reliance to the CPA's duty.
(ⅴ) In this case, although the CPA's marrige came to actual rupture, he had to be sentenced to in prison (including its suspension), as a result, authority-concerned has to necessarily cancel his license. Thus, it is desirable for the Constitutional Court to rule that “the cancellation and disqualification provisions of the CPA Act are unconstitutional, when applied to this applicant.”
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 간통죄에 대하여 징역형만을 법정형으로 정하고 있는 점에 관하여
Ⅲ. 비례의 원칙과 관련한 위헌성 논의
Ⅳ. 평등의 원칙 관련한 위헌성 논의
Ⅴ. 소송법적 문제
Ⅵ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
공인회계사법에 따른 징계에 관한 쟁송의 동향
동아법학
2020 .05
-
한국 공인회계사 제도의 발전사
경영사연구
2014 .01
-
중국 민사소송법의 의미와 내용
원광법학
2009 .01
-
公認會計士의 EDP 內部統制監査實務에 대한 調査分析
전북대학교 산업경제연구소 논문집
1992 .12
-
Evaluation of Conversion Action Data Mechanisms in Cost-Per-Action Advertising
학술발표대회 논문집
2008 .01
-
Evaluation of Conversion Action Data Mechanisms in Cost- Per-Action Advertising
Information Systems Review
2008 .01
-
보건과 복지가 통합된 영국의 공공 정신보건 전달체계연구 : CPA(Care Program Approach)를 중심으로
한국정신건강사회복지학회 학술발표논문집
2006 .11
-
헌법재판소의 결정이 검사기소권 등에 미친 영향* - 지난 20년간의 헌법재판소 결정례를 중심으로 -
법과 정책연구
2008 .01
-
형사소송법의 주요 개정과정과 의의
법학논집
2006 .01
-
한국적 시민경찰학교 모형에 관한 연구
정부학연구
2003 .01
-
刑事訴訟法 第201條의 2 第1項의 違憲性에 관한 檢討 : 미국 헌법 이론의 관점에서
저스티스
1999 .09
-
문화지원활동이 전통시장의 사회적 자본 형성 및 시장경쟁력에 미치는 영향 : 시장상인의 일상적 활동과의 비교적 관점으로
한국도시설계학회지 도시설계
2014 .02
-
이혼소송과 간통고소에 대한 판례의 비판적 검토
법학논집
2012 .01
-
합리적 양형기준을 위한 공통된 양형인자 도출의 필요성 - 제 2기 양형위원회 양형기준 대상범죄 양형인자 도출의 통일성 위한 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로 -
외법논집
2010 .01
-
특정경제범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률 제3조 제1항의 개정안에 대한 논의 : 배임죄와 관련하여
한양법학
2013 .08
-
양형기준설정과 관련된 몇 가지 고려사항
비교형사법연구
2008 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000473150