개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Worker retirement allowance guarantee law institutionally admits interim payment of retirement allowance which employer and worker agreed. However, if adjust retirement allowance in advance and pay monthly contract means give up of retirement allowance claim when become effective as retiring of worker, even if according to retirement allowance partial contract employer paid money titled retirement allowance it has no effect as a giving retirement allowance.
This judgement establishes the rule for the character of paid money titled retirement allowance according to retirement allowance partial contract which was am biguous, and has a meaning because it clarifies processing mode of it.
As companies who adopt inclusive wage system or annual salary system increase, from now on it is expected to happen similar issues. So it is anticipated this judgement to function as a standard of such troubles. When evaluating each matter rather than applying this judgement unconditionally, we should check the validity by checking whether retirement allowance partial contract between employer and worker is meant to substantially pay extra retirement allowance according to detailed fact relevance.
This judgement establishes the rule for the character of paid money titled retirement allowance according to retirement allowance partial contract which was am biguous, and has a meaning because it clarifies processing mode of it.
As companies who adopt inclusive wage system or annual salary system increase, from now on it is expected to happen similar issues. So it is anticipated this judgement to function as a standard of such troubles. When evaluating each matter rather than applying this judgement unconditionally, we should check the validity by checking whether retirement allowance partial contract between employer and worker is meant to substantially pay extra retirement allowance according to detailed fact relevance.
목차
Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 대상판결의 내용
Ⅲ. 퇴직금제도와 퇴직금중간정산
Ⅳ. 퇴직금 선지급 무효 시 해당 금원의 법적 효력
Ⅴ. 선지급 금원의 상계가능성
Ⅵ. 마치며
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
연봉제하에서의 퇴직금중간정산의 유효성 및 부당이득의 성립 여부 : 대판(전합) 2010. 5. 20, 2007다90760 판결을 중심으로
손종학
노동법논총
2010
.08
퇴직금 분할 약정과 부당이득반환 여부 : 대법원 2010. 5. 20. 선고 2007다90760 판결을 중심으로
유성재
노동법학
2011
.09
퇴직금 분할 약정이 무효인 경우 이미 지급한 퇴직금 명목의 금원이 부당이득에 해당하는지 여부와 그 반환 범위 : 대법원 2010. 5. 20. 선고 2007다90760 전원합의체 판결
김홍영
노동법학
2010
.09
퇴직금제도의 법운용상의 문제점
이철수
노동법연구
2003
.06
연봉제와 퇴직금 : 월급에 포함된 ‘퇴직금 명목 금원’의 부당이득 성립 여부
김희성
노동법학
2010
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-336-000594069