지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examines the basis for causes of the peasant movement in 1920s-1930s, how and why the characteristics of the disputes between the landowners and the tenant farmers changed, and what these changes mean to what extent.
Entering 1920s, the disputes between landowners and tenant farmers was boosted into anti-Japan peasant movement and in 1930s it was further turned into the struggles against landowners.
More specifically, it turned from political and economic demand to economic demand (change in demand), from collective disputes to noncollective, individual disputes (change in dispute behaviors), from complement to legal and illegal struggles to complete devotion to legal struggles (change in struggle strategy), and government's authorities' direct intervention after the disputes and institutional suppression by brute force to open mediation before and after the disputes (change in the government-general's countermeasures). Such changes are basically caused by colonial authority's conciliation and suppression. The colonial authority had to mediate the contradiction towards the direction where landownders and the tenant farmers are absorbed into the system in order for the imperialism to maintain and reinforce its system. It appeared as suppression at one time and as institutional, government-made movement at another. As a result, contradiction inherent in people and in class slowed, the disputes subdued in a way of being absorbed into its own system, and the campaign for liberation of the oppressed people retreated.
Amid these changes, the tenant farmers that have been transferred into the product economy were faced with forward-looking immiseration and started making their demand to the landownders for economic improvement. They didn't accept the farm rent as given. Instead, they became aware that higher production capacity lead to higher production cost and to levying additional farm rent and finally to economic difficulty and they started the disputes.
Entering 1920s, the disputes between landowners and tenant farmers was boosted into anti-Japan peasant movement and in 1930s it was further turned into the struggles against landowners.
More specifically, it turned from political and economic demand to economic demand (change in demand), from collective disputes to noncollective, individual disputes (change in dispute behaviors), from complement to legal and illegal struggles to complete devotion to legal struggles (change in struggle strategy), and government's authorities' direct intervention after the disputes and institutional suppression by brute force to open mediation before and after the disputes (change in the government-general's countermeasures). Such changes are basically caused by colonial authority's conciliation and suppression. The colonial authority had to mediate the contradiction towards the direction where landownders and the tenant farmers are absorbed into the system in order for the imperialism to maintain and reinforce its system. It appeared as suppression at one time and as institutional, government-made movement at another. As a result, contradiction inherent in people and in class slowed, the disputes subdued in a way of being absorbed into its own system, and the campaign for liberation of the oppressed people retreated.
Amid these changes, the tenant farmers that have been transferred into the product economy were faced with forward-looking immiseration and started making their demand to the landownders for economic improvement. They didn't accept the farm rent as given. Instead, they became aware that higher production capacity lead to higher production cost and to levying additional farm rent and finally to economic difficulty and they started the disputes.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 농민운동의 발생기반과 추이
Ⅲ. 농민운동의 성격 변화와 특징
Ⅳ. 농민운동 성격변화의 의의와 한계
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
근대 익산의 농업환경과 농민운동
지역사회연구
2020 .06
-
한국 공공갈등의 생애주기별 특징에 대한 경험적 분석
한국사회와 행정연구
2011 .11
-
일제시대 식민지 근대화와 농민운동의 전환
한국사회학
2007 .02
-
전자사회와 IT분쟁조정법제
법학논집
2007 .01
-
주택임대차 분쟁유형에 관한 연구 : 서울시 주택임대차 간이분쟁조정 자료를 중심으로
주거환경
2018 .07
-
권리분쟁과 쟁의행위대상
노동법학
2016 .12
-
지역분쟁 해소의 기본방향과 전략
지역연구
1996 .12
-
The Procedural Benefits of Arbitrating Patent Disputes
중재연구
2016 .01
-
미국과 캐나다의 노사분쟁조정제도의 고찰
노동법논총
2005 .12
-
대형 오피스빌딩의 서비스품질이 임차인만족도,고객충성도 및 경제가치에 미치는 영향
부동산학연구
2008 .01
-
현행 금융 분쟁 해결제도에 관한 법적 연구
일감법학
2011 .01
-
캄보디아의 분쟁해결문화와 협상방식 : ADR를 중심으로
동남아연구
2018 .01
-
우주법상 분쟁해결방안
원광법학
2008 .01
-
선호시설과 비선호시설에 의해 발생한 공공분쟁의 정치경제학
21세기정치학회보
2013 .09
-
중국기업과의 효율적인 분쟁해결방안에 관한 연구
중재연구
2004 .01
-
사례연구를 통한 소송이외의 의료분쟁 해결방안의 검토와 개선방안
한국병원경영학회지
2013 .01
-
주택임대차분쟁 조정유형의 특성 분석
주택도시연구
2019 .08
-
행정형 위원회에 의한 소비자 관련 집단분쟁의 운영 현황과 문제점 개선을 위한 제언
외법논집
2016 .01
-
자본주의로 인해 해체되어 가는 농촌의 생활상 ‒ 히라바야시 다이코의 「야풍」을 중심으로 ‒
일본근대학연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-309-000576848