메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
건국대학교 법학연구소 일감법학 일감법학 제19호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
69 - 109 (41page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
For resolving financial disputes, an alternative dispute resolution system (the “ADR”), such as conciliation, mediation and arbitration, in addition to a litigation system by a court, may be used. The ADR system is evaluated as more beneficial one than the litigation system in terms of time and costs for resolving or settling disputes. Among the ADR system, in Korea, the conciliation system has been mainly and actively operated in the matters of financial disputes. Under the financial dispute conciliation system, the financial institutions and financial consumers concerned come to an agreement settling the relevant disputes, through reasonable adjustments arranged by the Financial Dispute Conciliation Committee (the “FDCC”), a committee established under the Financial Supervisory Service. However, the current financial dispute settlement system are assessed to have some drawbacks, among others, including the following: first, the system for settling financial disputes consists of the diversified settlement agencies so that it leads to less efficient system; second, the FDCC as the dispute resolution agency lacks the independence and professionalism; third, the rate of the FDCC’s conciliation proposal being accepted by either party is low; and fourth, the “collective financial dispute resolution procedure system” is not being operated. Therefore, this article suggests some improvements as follows: first, an independent and professional dispute resolution agency should be established; second, the FDCC’s conciliation proposal accepted by the party of financial consumers should be legally binding on the financial institutions; third, the arbitration system needs to be introduced in the financial dispute settlement system; and fourth, the “collective dispute resolution procedure system” should be also introduced.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0