지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this article is to explore the significance of the Pauline anthropology in his soteriology. To do this, we take two anthropological terms 'conscience' and 'Law' as example and investigate which role they play in the argumentation of Paul. It is often maintained that the conscience is a less important term than the law, but this view results from the ignorance of the fact that the reality reconstructed through Paul's letters does not necessarily correspond to the overall thought of the apostle itself. Now that the Torah considers to be the fundamental norm of ethic for Jews, a question can be raised, which other criterium is to be applied to gentiles. A careful survey of pagan literature compels us to assume that the conscience as well as the Law provide criteria with which one can judge and reflect his own behavior.
Therefore the traditional analogy between the Law and the conscience should not be discarded, but through our exegetical observation reconfirmed. I go so far as to claim that Paul's gentile converts were convinced of their being sinners and so became Christians. This view is supported especially by the argument of Paul in Rom 2:15. There the apostle unmistakably tries to repudiate the gentile privilege in the polemic on the Law, by referring to the implied function of the conscience. 1. Cor 4:4 demonstrates however, that this conscience was relativized after the conversion of Paul's Christians. Needless to say, the good conscience leads no more to the faith in Christ than the Law does. But both of them play a not negative role in the justification: people come to realize that they are sinners and need the gospel, in so far as the conscience and the Law let them reflect their conducts. The observations we made lead us to conclude that the anthropological settings in Paul play rather a decisive role in the Pauline soteriology.
Therefore the traditional analogy between the Law and the conscience should not be discarded, but through our exegetical observation reconfirmed. I go so far as to claim that Paul's gentile converts were convinced of their being sinners and so became Christians. This view is supported especially by the argument of Paul in Rom 2:15. There the apostle unmistakably tries to repudiate the gentile privilege in the polemic on the Law, by referring to the implied function of the conscience. 1. Cor 4:4 demonstrates however, that this conscience was relativized after the conversion of Paul's Christians. Needless to say, the good conscience leads no more to the faith in Christ than the Law does. But both of them play a not negative role in the justification: people come to realize that they are sinners and need the gospel, in so far as the conscience and the Law let them reflect their conducts. The observations we made lead us to conclude that the anthropological settings in Paul play rather a decisive role in the Pauline soteriology.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 방법론적 전제
Ⅲ. 양심 - 헬라적 판단근거
Ⅳ. 율법 - 유대적 판단근거
Ⅴ. 양심과 율법 - ‘죄인’ 됨의 판단근거
Ⅵ. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
이홍주(李泓周)의 ‘도덕관’ 분석 - 그의 “良心의 威力”(1922)을 중심으로
한국기독교신학논총
2020 .04
-
루터의 종교개혁적 양심 : 칸트의 자율적 양심론의 한계를 넘어서
신학연구
2017 .12
-
니체의 약자의 양심과 주권적 양심에 대한 고찰
철학논총
2015 .04
-
토마스 아퀴나스에서 양심과 실천적 지혜의 관계
현상학과 현대철학
2013 .06
-
바울의 불편한 양심 : 롬 7장을 기초해서
신약논단
2009 .03
-
율법의 행위로 인한 구원의 가능성 : 로마서 2장 12-16절을 중심으로
신약논단
2016 .09
-
양심과 양심의 가책. 그 계보의 차이
철학
2007 .02
-
윤리적 선택과 판단의 기로에 선 인간의 윤리 원칙에 대한 성찰
인간연구
2012 .07
-
칭의론에 나타난 환대의 윤리
대학과 선교
2019 .01
-
조선 후기 근대적 양심 개념의 도입 경위와 천주교의 역할
코기토
2014 .02
-
막스 셸러의 양심론 : 르상티망과 가치적대의 극복
코기토
2008 .02
-
초기 크리스천 공동체 내에서 여성들의 역할에 관한 바울의 신학/윤리적 전거
신학논단
2019 .03
-
바울의 Q 사용에 대한 연구
신약논단
2004 .03
-
Paul`s Conversion
한국기독교신학논총
2002 .07
-
살리는 복음, 살릴 수 없는 율법 : 바울의 복음과 율법
Canon&Culture
2011 .10
-
‘사이’에서 바울을 읽다 : 서중석 교수의 바울서신 해석
신학논단
2014 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-230-004245697