지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis is a discussion how conscience can be stipulated and what a role it plays in the Max Scheler’s ethical system. A characteristic of Scheler’s ethics is to be said ‘non-formal value ethics’ in a word, which is developed on the ground of two poles, ‘value’ and ‘person.’ Scheler’s debate on conscience is also focused on the revelation of the reason why ‘resentment’ phenomenon appears and the way how we can overcome ‘value antagonism’ in the modern capitalism civil society.
We elucidate, at first, conscience is basically a ‘value-consciousness’, and it’s organic place is a person which means a bearer of moral value, good and evil. Secondly, we contemplate ‘the order of heart’ to see how we can feel a qualms of conscience. But a disturbing the
order of heart causes directly the destruction of person, and this is a source that we necessarily fall into resentment. So, thirdly, we study what resentment is and how value antagonism can bring about. And lastly we consider a searching the way how we can recover conscience in the modern society.
Scheler appeals to religion, especially Christian in connection with a recovering of conscience. At this point of view Scheler shows us a kind of limitation as religious philosopher, but he stress religion, that has traditionally been played for resolution of human’s inner crisis, must play a role in the modern capitalism civil society, too. We are sure an anthropological synthesis can be result from the reconciliation between philosophy(narrowly ethics) and religion(especially Christian) at last, and Scheler’s debate on conscience has to be basically served for the consideration of a new anthropological synthesis.
We elucidate, at first, conscience is basically a ‘value-consciousness’, and it’s organic place is a person which means a bearer of moral value, good and evil. Secondly, we contemplate ‘the order of heart’ to see how we can feel a qualms of conscience. But a disturbing the
order of heart causes directly the destruction of person, and this is a source that we necessarily fall into resentment. So, thirdly, we study what resentment is and how value antagonism can bring about. And lastly we consider a searching the way how we can recover conscience in the modern society.
Scheler appeals to religion, especially Christian in connection with a recovering of conscience. At this point of view Scheler shows us a kind of limitation as religious philosopher, but he stress religion, that has traditionally been played for resolution of human’s inner crisis, must play a role in the modern capitalism civil society, too. We are sure an anthropological synthesis can be result from the reconciliation between philosophy(narrowly ethics) and religion(especially Christian) at last, and Scheler’s debate on conscience has to be basically served for the consideration of a new anthropological synthesis.
목차
1. 머리말-양심이란?
2. 가치와 인격
3. 마음의 질서
4. 르상티망과 가치적대-양심의 상실
5. 양심의 가책과 후회
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
이홍주(李泓周)의 ‘도덕관’ 분석 - 그의 “良心의 威力”(1922)을 중심으로
한국기독교신학논총
2020 .04
-
루터의 종교개혁적 양심 : 칸트의 자율적 양심론의 한계를 넘어서
신학연구
2017 .12
-
니체의 약자의 양심과 주권적 양심에 대한 고찰
철학논총
2015 .04
-
토마스 아퀴나스에서 양심과 실천적 지혜의 관계
현상학과 현대철학
2013 .06
-
Max Scheler와 N. Hartmann에 있어서의 가치의 서열문제
철학연구
1965 .05
-
막스 셸러 후기 철학에서 '지식'문제
철학연구
2000 .08
-
Max scheler 價値論理學의 小考
철학논총
1992 .10
-
‘양심’과 ‘율법’의 기능 : 바울 구원론에 있어서 판단근거의 문제
신학논단
2007 .09
-
초기 Scheler 철학고찰 : 가치윤리학정초에의 시도
철학연구
1976 .11
-
양심과 양심의 가책. 그 계보의 차이
철학
2007 .02
-
조선 후기 근대적 양심 개념의 도입 경위와 천주교의 역할
코기토
2014 .02
-
막스 셸러의 윤리학적 공감론
철학논총
1999 .02
-
막스 셸러의 공감론(Ⅰ)
철학논총
1997 .11
-
하르트만과 셸러의 인격에 관한 연구
철학논총
2000 .07
-
‘르상티망(Ressentiment)’과 그리스도교적 윤리에 대한 재고
원불교사상과종교문화
2014 .03
-
헤겔의 실천철학에서 양심의 문제
인문논총
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0