지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.2
- 수록면
- 189 - 216 (28page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Focusing on government-enterprise relations and bureaucrat-enterpriser reations, this paper examine the cause, process and the results of ownership reform in late 1990s in southern Jiangsuprovince( Sunan Area), which has been attract so many attention as a reform and development model of socialist economic system without ownership change. The local government-led market oriented development model has formed in Sunan Areaand the local cadres executed the important role in this process. The distinctive feature of this model of government role was that the local government is a market behaviors as well as the supervisors(that is, regulators) of market. So, the aims of ownership reforms in ate 1990s was to divide the government-enterprise relations.
But local governments and cadres' role has been maintained in directly and strongly without fundamental change. Firstly, the local governments remained as enterprise owners as well as owners of rural collective assets as before from the county-level governments in which introduced the limited-liability companies to township-level governments in which selled off the collective enterprises to private enterprisers. Secondly, local cadres and enterprisers connected in closely as before. That is to say, at present, the only changes is that, local cadres actually can transform for oneself to enterprisers and reverse, while before the ownership reform local cadres including the secretaries of local communist party branches were not only the bureaucrats but also the enterprisers in same time. Thirdly, local governments and cadres remained as marketized competitor as before. If it could increase there own incomes, local governments and cadres can put in operation the privatization - in many cases, privatization actually means the bankruptcy and sell off of enterprises, increasing unemployment - or effort to introduce the private enterprises and/or foreign enterprises.
China's position in regarding the economic role of government or government-enterprise relations maybe the one point of a sequence line which link the two connecting points - the one is the combining point that divided local government-enterprises and the regularized market, that is, the best combination, the other side is undivided local government-enterprise relations and uncontrolled competition between the locals, that is, the worst combination. Up to now, in spite of the small possibility of going to worst combining point, closer to worst combining point implies that China should pay many costs in process of reform and development.
But local governments and cadres' role has been maintained in directly and strongly without fundamental change. Firstly, the local governments remained as enterprise owners as well as owners of rural collective assets as before from the county-level governments in which introduced the limited-liability companies to township-level governments in which selled off the collective enterprises to private enterprisers. Secondly, local cadres and enterprisers connected in closely as before. That is to say, at present, the only changes is that, local cadres actually can transform for oneself to enterprisers and reverse, while before the ownership reform local cadres including the secretaries of local communist party branches were not only the bureaucrats but also the enterprisers in same time. Thirdly, local governments and cadres remained as marketized competitor as before. If it could increase there own incomes, local governments and cadres can put in operation the privatization - in many cases, privatization actually means the bankruptcy and sell off of enterprises, increasing unemployment - or effort to introduce the private enterprises and/or foreign enterprises.
China's position in regarding the economic role of government or government-enterprise relations maybe the one point of a sequence line which link the two connecting points - the one is the combining point that divided local government-enterprises and the regularized market, that is, the best combination, the other side is undivided local government-enterprise relations and uncontrolled competition between the locals, that is, the worst combination. Up to now, in spite of the small possibility of going to worst combining point, closer to worst combining point implies that China should pay many costs in process of reform and development.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 소유제, 시장경쟁, 관료의 이해관계
Ⅲ. 지방정부/관료 중심적 정부-기업관계와 위기
Ⅳ. 지방정부/관료 중심적 민영화
Ⅴ. 정부-기업관계의 변화 1) : 주식제기업
Ⅵ. 정부-기업관계의 변화 2) : 민영화 기업
Ⅶ. 요약과 함의
〈참고문헌〉
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국지방자치제도의 선진화를 위한 담론적 접근 : 중앙과 지방의 관계를 중심으로
한국사회과학연구
2008 .06
-
지방공기업 부채증가 변인에 관한 연구
한국비교정부학보
2015 .01
-
지방공기업 부채 절감방안에 관한 소고
한국지방재정논집
2011 .08
-
지방공기업과 사회적기업 연계모형 연구
도시행정학보
2011 .12
-
지방공기업의 수익성 영향요인 분석 : 전국 광역자치단체 개발공사를 중심으로
도시행정학보
2017 .03
-
베트남의 국영기업 소유구조 변화와 정부-기업관계
동남아시아연구
2013 .01
-
Local Government Evaluation System in Korea
학술대회 발표논문집
2012 .05
-
지방정부의 인적자원개발 기능 강화를 위한 조직 및 운영체제 개선 방안 연구
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .11
-
로컬푸드와 사회적 기업 : 대구경북의 사례를 중심으로
경영경제
2010 .02
-
Government 3.0 : Is it working?
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2014 .07
-
프랑스 지방정부의 역할 및 중앙정부와의 갈등해결에 관한 연구 : 권한분배를 중심으로
유럽연구
1998 .06
-
DECENTRALIZATION AND E-GOVERNMENT IN KOREA
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2003 .10
-
국가와 지방자치단체의 상충관계에 관한 소고
한양법학
2014 .05
-
Reforms of Public Enterprises
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2015 .06
-
Employing Reinventing Government Framework to Accelerate Decentralization : The Need for Strategic Approaches To Create High Performance Local Government Organizations
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2003 .10
-
现代中国中央与地方关系的变迁及制度化实践
지방자치법연구
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-305-004001362