지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Assessed and determined in this article, is why a specific time period was selected to be described as the era that witnessed the supposed completion of the Local officials' Salary system, and why was the documentation of the "We'gwan-rok(外官祿 : Salaries for the Local Officials)" entry of the Economy Section(食貨志) inside 『History of the Goryeo Dynasty(高麗史)』 was actually fabricated. It seems like a political consideration was involved in the documentation process, as a specific order of the government which was issued during a specific time period was described as issued at an entirely different date. The reason for that will be examined here.
The "We'gwan-rok(外官祿)" entry is composed of two sets of regulations("Kings' orders"). One set is allegedly from the era of King Munjong's reign(文宗朝, Munjong's orders), while the other is supposed to be from the era of King Injong's reign(仁宗朝, Injong's orders). Yet both sets of records are actually based upon one source of information, a text that was created in the 2nd year of King Myeongjong's reign. This text also has a supplemental section(追記) which covered facts that occurred until the early days of King Shinjong's reign. The so-called "Munjong's orders" portion seems to have been based upon the main body of the said Myeongjong text, and the "Injong's orders" portion seems to have been based upon the supplemental section. And in the meantime, regarding the Gyeonggi Capital region(京畿) and the Western Gyeonggi region(西京畿), the establishment of such units themselves is thoroughly highlighted and emphasized.
This seems because the officials who were behind the Salary system Reform project during King Gong'yang-wang's reign needed to establish a concept of "The Institutions of the Munjong's days('文宗舊制'), in order to propel their plans toward substantial reforms. They claimed that the dynasty's salary system had already been firmly established during the reign of King Munjong(and had to be resurrected), and in order to supply their argument with a proof, they actually fabricated the so-called "Munjong's orders," and created the "Injong's orders" as well, based upon the above-mentioned records.
The "We'gwan-rok(外官祿)" entry is composed of two sets of regulations("Kings' orders"). One set is allegedly from the era of King Munjong's reign(文宗朝, Munjong's orders), while the other is supposed to be from the era of King Injong's reign(仁宗朝, Injong's orders). Yet both sets of records are actually based upon one source of information, a text that was created in the 2nd year of King Myeongjong's reign. This text also has a supplemental section(追記) which covered facts that occurred until the early days of King Shinjong's reign. The so-called "Munjong's orders" portion seems to have been based upon the main body of the said Myeongjong text, and the "Injong's orders" portion seems to have been based upon the supplemental section. And in the meantime, regarding the Gyeonggi Capital region(京畿) and the Western Gyeonggi region(西京畿), the establishment of such units themselves is thoroughly highlighted and emphasized.
This seems because the officials who were behind the Salary system Reform project during King Gong'yang-wang's reign needed to establish a concept of "The Institutions of the Munjong's days('文宗舊制'), in order to propel their plans toward substantial reforms. They claimed that the dynasty's salary system had already been firmly established during the reign of King Munjong(and had to be resurrected), and in order to supply their argument with a proof, they actually fabricated the so-called "Munjong's orders," and created the "Injong's orders" as well, based upon the above-mentioned records.
목차
머리말
1. 외관록 규정의 기준 시점과 정리 방식
2. 외관록 규정의 성립 배경
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
高麗 文宗代 對宋通交와 貿易
역사학보
2008 .12
-
고려 문종대 王太子 冊封과 太子 관련 制度 정비의 의미
역사민속학
2014 .07
-
『고려사』지리지 ‘대경기’ 기사의 비판적 검토 : 공민왕 18년 경기 탁전(度田)으로의 재해석
역사와현실
2008 .09
-
高麗 文宗의 국정 운영 : 文宗代 詔書를 중심으로
한국인물사연구
2007 .03
-
고려 문종 대 ‘해동천하’ 인식의 형성과 그 의미
한국사상과 문화
2018 .01
-
고려중기 예종ㆍ인종의 통치와 관료집단의 성격
한국인물사연구
2007 .09
-
『고려사』의 편찬과 조선전기 前朝史인식
사학연구
2014 .12
-
조선 초기 역사서와 『동국병감』의 편찬
韓國史學史學報
2015 .01
-
고려전기 公服制의 정비 과정에 대한 연구
사학연구
2016 .03
-
박기수ㆍ이경룡ㆍ하원수ㆍ김경호 역주, 『사료로 읽는 중국 고대 사회경제사,『史記』「平準書」ㆍ「貨殖列傅」, 『漢書』「食貨志」』, (청어람미디어, 2005)
역사학보
2007 .06
-
공민왕대 관제개편의 내용 및 의미
역사학보
2009 .03
-
高麗 中書門下省의 祿俸規定 : 《高麗史》食貨志 祿俸條의 검토
한국사연구
1985 .12
-
고려전기 정부의 한인(漢人)인식과 내투(來投) 한인들의 행적
역사와현실
2012 .06
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
『漢書』「食貨志」上 譯註2 (中華書局 標點本, pp.1130-1147)
중국사연구
2004 .01
-
전쟁과 재해 : 『晉書』「食貨志」에 보이는 杜預의 재해 대책을 중심으로
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .02
-
高麗 仁宗朝 國學生들의 정치적 활동 : 國學生들이 올린 上疏 및 上書에 대한 검토
역사학보
2004 .06
-
고려시대 西京畿의 형성과 재편 - 『고려사』 지리지 연혁의 補正을 중심으로 -
동방학지
2009 .01
-
宋史食貨志阬冶分析
역사교육
1982 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003773809