지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to observe closely how genitive case-markers were used in the later middle Korean. The genitive case has the function that forms noun phrase combining a preceding noun and a following noun in the Korean. This is almost same in the later middle Korean.
The genitive case-marker ‘애/의’ and ‘ㅅ’ which used being quite distinct from each other appeared in the later middle Korean. While ‘애/의’ was used going after a preceding noun which was an inhonorific human noun, ‘ㅅ’ was used going after a preceding noun which was an honorific human noun or inhuman noun. On this account, the most Korean lingusists have concluded that the genitive case-marker ‘애/의’ and ‘ㅅ’ in the later middle Korean were choiced and used according to the kind of a preceding noun.
Nevertheless, an exceptional examples of the genitive case-markers had appeared already in the later middle Korean. They shows clearly that the function of the genitive case-marker can’t be explained only according to the kind of a preceding noun. Therefore, I examined not only the kind of a preceding noun but also that of a following noun on an exceptional examples of the genitive case-marker in the later middle Korean. Plus, I looked into relation between a preceding noun and a following noun in meaning.
As a result, I could confirm that the examples of ‘ㅅ’ used going after a preceding noun which was an inhonorific human noun were fossilized forms, that those of ‘?/의’ used going after a preceding noun which was an honorific human noun or inhuman noun were reformation forms.
The genitive case-marker ‘애/의’ and ‘ㅅ’ which used being quite distinct from each other appeared in the later middle Korean. While ‘애/의’ was used going after a preceding noun which was an inhonorific human noun, ‘ㅅ’ was used going after a preceding noun which was an honorific human noun or inhuman noun. On this account, the most Korean lingusists have concluded that the genitive case-marker ‘애/의’ and ‘ㅅ’ in the later middle Korean were choiced and used according to the kind of a preceding noun.
Nevertheless, an exceptional examples of the genitive case-markers had appeared already in the later middle Korean. They shows clearly that the function of the genitive case-marker can’t be explained only according to the kind of a preceding noun. Therefore, I examined not only the kind of a preceding noun but also that of a following noun on an exceptional examples of the genitive case-marker in the later middle Korean. Plus, I looked into relation between a preceding noun and a following noun in meaning.
As a result, I could confirm that the examples of ‘ㅅ’ used going after a preceding noun which was an inhonorific human noun were fossilized forms, that those of ‘?/의’ used going after a preceding noun which was an honorific human noun or inhuman noun were reformation forms.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 속격조사의 용법과 예외적 쓰임
3. 유정물 체언
4. 무정물 체언 ＋ 애
5. 맺음말
참고 문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[long] as a Noun Compound Marker in Korean
언어
2004 .12
-
명사와 국어사
한국어학
2014 .02
-
속격표시어 ’s 사용의 불확실성
새한영어영문학
2008 .05
-
‘N₁+N₂’ 형 합성명사 기술의 몇 문제
한국현대문학회 학술발표회자료집
2012 .08
-
명사의 형태론
한국어학
2014 .02
-
의미 속성을 중심으로 한 명사 교육 내용 연구
국어교육연구
2012 .08
-
Noun Compounds in Korean
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
2001 .08
-
「名詞＋ナ+名詞」における意味的考察
日本語敎育
2018 .01
-
국어 수량 명사 구문의 통사 구조
어문학
2003 .09
-
The Role of Head Nouns in Real-time Semantic Integration of Second Language Noun-noun Compounds
영어학연구
2012 .01
-
최근 영어에서의 속격 구문에 대하여
영어학연구
2012 .01
-
영어의 집합명사의 구분에 관한 연구
언어과학
2015 .01
-
한·영·독·스페인어 명사구의 어순 비교 연구
언어과학연구
2004 .03
-
Korean Children's Acquisition of Novel Compound Nouns
담화와인지
2006 .08
-
Semantic Constraints on the Genitive Complements of Verbal Nouns in Korean
어학연구
2006 .12
-
국어 속격 명사구와 (-의)의 의미
우리말글
2001 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-810-003793812