지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.12
- 수록면
- 9 - 133 (126page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Democratic government is not possible without fair and honest election procedures. There have been many impediments to the realization of genuine democracy in Korea. Korean citizens are cynical about the possibility of a genuinely democratic government and apathetic regarding the election process. The citizens' apathy has encouraged political candidates to assume that violations of election laws will be overlooked or even tolerated when they are uncovered, thereby adding to the citizens' distrust of politics and politicians and their disdain for government institutions.
History is filled with examples. The Law on Public Election and Prevention of Illegal Elections enacted in 1994 was designed to guarantee clean and fair elections. Although many Koreans expected this law to achieve its goals, illegal and corrupt practices have persisted and a "culture of corruption" remains in place. Political unfairness during the investigatory, prosecutorial and trial processes abound and include trial delays, unwarranted clemency, and minor penalties that are incommensurate with the costs to the public of illegal acts by corrupt politicians who profit from their greed.
The authors have identified promising remedial measures to improve the election process. Priority should be placed on establishing fair and impartial judiciary procedures. Judges must be objective and follow the rule of law. They should cooperate in developing a uniform approach to dealing with violations of election laws and precedents that will guide each judge in handling assigned cases without bias or favoritism toward any of the contestants during trials. Additionally, trials should begin promptly and within a maximum of one year. Defendants should no longer be granted delays so that they can continue participating in the deliberations of the National Assembly or so that they can remain at home because of illnesses that are not life threatening or genuinely severe. A uniform trial schedule should be established for all courts and all trials should begin promptly and continue without unwarranted interruptions every day until the trial ends.
To avoid severe, and possibly disastrous civil disorder, we must adhere to existing election laws and ensure fair and clean elections that will restore the confidence of the people in their government.
History is filled with examples. The Law on Public Election and Prevention of Illegal Elections enacted in 1994 was designed to guarantee clean and fair elections. Although many Koreans expected this law to achieve its goals, illegal and corrupt practices have persisted and a "culture of corruption" remains in place. Political unfairness during the investigatory, prosecutorial and trial processes abound and include trial delays, unwarranted clemency, and minor penalties that are incommensurate with the costs to the public of illegal acts by corrupt politicians who profit from their greed.
The authors have identified promising remedial measures to improve the election process. Priority should be placed on establishing fair and impartial judiciary procedures. Judges must be objective and follow the rule of law. They should cooperate in developing a uniform approach to dealing with violations of election laws and precedents that will guide each judge in handling assigned cases without bias or favoritism toward any of the contestants during trials. Additionally, trials should begin promptly and within a maximum of one year. Defendants should no longer be granted delays so that they can continue participating in the deliberations of the National Assembly or so that they can remain at home because of illnesses that are not life threatening or genuinely severe. A uniform trial schedule should be established for all courts and all trials should begin promptly and continue without unwarranted interruptions every day until the trial ends.
To avoid severe, and possibly disastrous civil disorder, we must adhere to existing election laws and ensure fair and clean elections that will restore the confidence of the people in their government.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 선거사범의 개념 정의
제3장 공정선거 구현을 위한 제도
제4장 선거사범의 분포와 처리실태
제5장 선거사범 처리 문제점 및 개선방안
제6장 결론
참고문헌
〈부록〉 당선무효형 사건의 재판 진행 경과 내역
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
개정 선거법과 공명선거
사회과학연구
2004 .08
-
선거 활동, 지식 및 관심에 미치는 텔레비전, 포털, SNS 이용의 영향 - 20대 총선을 중심으로
사회과학연구
2020 .02
-
Reflections of the Mongolian Great Election Year 2004-2005
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2008 .06
-
선거사범의 처벌과 당선무효에 관한 비교법적 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
-
2002년과 2006년 전국 동시 지방선거 비교
사회과학연구
2006 .08
-
정치자금법과 공직선거법
외법논집
2008 .01
-
선거제도와 선거운동
저스티스
2012 .06
-
여성후보의 당선에 영향을 미치는 요인 : 20대 총선을 중심으로
OUGHTOPIA
2016 .11
-
재,보궐선거의 특징과 정치적 의미 : 2005년 4월 30일 국회의원 재선거를 중심으로
21세기정치학회보
2007 .05
-
미국 연방선거법상 기업의 정치적 독립지출허용의 의미와 시사점 －Citizens United v. FEC 판례를 중심으로－
외법논집
2012 .01
-
선거제도에 관한 헌법재판소 판례의 평가
공법학연구
2006 .02
-
A Study on the Overseas Voting System through Korean Voter’s Thoughts and Attitudes in LA, Orange County
미국헌법연구
2010 .08
-
공직선거법상 선거운동의 개념으로서 목적의사와 목적범의 판단기준 - 대법원 2016. 8. 26. 선고 2015도11812 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로 -
형사법연구
2019 .01
-
선거와 선거관리에 대한 유권자 의식 분석 : 제19대 대통령 선거를 중심으로
연구방법논총
2017 .11
-
French Voting System for Local Elections
유럽헌법연구
2010 .01
-
Thailand’s 2019 General Election: Post-Election Uncertainties and Trust Concerns
EAI 이슈브리핑
2020 .02
-
2012년 총선은 왜 중대 선거가 되지 못했나
시민과세계
2012 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
선거사범의 처벌과 당선무효에 관한 비교법적 연구
임성식
,
이경렬
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006
.12
어떤 민주주의인가? : 제도와 가치체계의 조응을 통해 바라본 한국 민주주의의 발전방향 모색
강신구
한국정당학회보
2012
.11
음주운전의 억제요인에 대한 연구
전영실
형사정책연구
2009
.03
A Coherent Model in Upholding General Deterrence Theory and Impact to Information Security Management
Myeonggil Choi
,
Edwin R. Ramos
,
Mansig Kim
외 3명
Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
2009
.09
申命淳, 『제삼세계정치론』(法文社, 1987)
朴光周
국제정치논총
1988
.01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003835312