메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
한상훈 (연세대학교)
저널정보
한국형사법무정책연구원 형사정책연구원 연구총서 연구총서 09-18
발행연도
2009.12
수록면
7 - 171 (166page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This report explores the responsibility of the self-induced intoxication, and proposes some suggestions for the reform of the criminal law and criminal procedure. Academically this theme has been deeply and from different points of views discussed, however it has not triggered such a hectic debate and controversy until the result of a rape trial was reported in Sep. 2009. A 57-year-old man named Cho Doo-soon who had raped an 8-year-old girl near her school in the morning, resulting in a permanent disability, infuriated the society, when his sentence of 12-years of imprisonment with seven years of wearing an electronic anklet and five years of having his personal information open to the public was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Korea. His brutal sex crime and the decision unleashed a wave of anger, with people arguing that it was too light a punishment for such a crime.
Since the Cho Doo-soon case, the legislature, the ministry of justice, NGO's, and academics have endeavored to find better solutions. Dozens of new bills have been introduced to the National Assembly; new suggestions to raise the level of regulation on sexual offenders, especially those against children, to revise the sentencing guidelines of sex crimes, to abolish diminished capability due to self-induced intoxication, etc.
First of all, this report summarises the history of the punishment of the actio libera in causa, and voluntary intoxication from the ancient Greece, Rome to the modern countries, from England, USA, Germany, France to Korea, Japan.
Second, this paper demonstrates the legitimacy of the full punishment of the voluntary intoxication, basing its reason on the abuse of rights or the principle of Venire contra factum proprium theoretically. In addition, the reports suggests some revision of the Criminal Code of Korea section 10(3).
Third, this reports make a suggestion that the effect of the reduced mental capability should be a voluntary mitigating factor, rather than the current compulsary one, because there are a plenty of cases where the diminished mental capability does not deserve such a mitigation.
Fourth, under the current criminal procedure, the guilt-phase and the sentencing phase are integrated. This causes some problems when the question of the mental disease is raised and evidences are introduced before the defendant is found guilty, especially in jury trials. In total, it is desirable to bifurcate the criminal trial into guilty phase and insanity/sentencing phase, so that insanity or reduced capability defense should be determined in latter phase.

목차

국문요약
제1장 연구의 필요성 및 목적
제2장 자초한 명정상태 처벌의 연혁
제3장 우리나라 책임능력규정의 연혁
제4장 외국의 입법례
제5장 자초명정 또는 원인에 있어서 자유로운 행위의 형사책임
제6장 자초한 명정상태하의 범죄에 관한 개선방안
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003948421