개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
"Designated offence" means (a) an indictable offence under Criminal Code or any other Act of Parliament, other than an indictable offence prescribed by regulation, or (b) a conspiracy or an attempt to commit, being an accessory after the fact in relation to, or any counselling in relation to, an offence referred to in paragraph (a).
According to Section 462.33, (1) The Attorney General may make an application for a restraint order in respect of any property. Where an application for a restraint order is made to a judge, the judge may, if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that there exists within the province in which the judge has jurisdiction or any other province, any property in respect of which an order of forfeiture may be made, in respect of a designated offence alleged to have been committed within the province in which the judge has jurisdiction, make an order prohibiting any person from disposing of, or otherwise dealing with any interest in, the property specified in the order otherwise than in such manner as may be specified in the order.
Before making an order, a judge shall require the Attorney General to give such undertakings as the judge considers appropriate with respect to the payment of damages or costs, or both, in relation to (a) the making of an order in respect of property situated within or outside Canada; and (b) the execution of an order in respect of property situated within Canada.
The property of an offender may be used to satisfy the operation of a provision of this or any other Act of Parliament respecting the forfeiture of property only to the extent that it is not required to satisfy the operation of any other provision of this or any other Act of Parliament respecting restitution to or compensation of persons affected by the commission of offences.
According to Section 462.33, (1) The Attorney General may make an application for a restraint order in respect of any property. Where an application for a restraint order is made to a judge, the judge may, if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that there exists within the province in which the judge has jurisdiction or any other province, any property in respect of which an order of forfeiture may be made, in respect of a designated offence alleged to have been committed within the province in which the judge has jurisdiction, make an order prohibiting any person from disposing of, or otherwise dealing with any interest in, the property specified in the order otherwise than in such manner as may be specified in the order.
Before making an order, a judge shall require the Attorney General to give such undertakings as the judge considers appropriate with respect to the payment of damages or costs, or both, in relation to (a) the making of an order in respect of property situated within or outside Canada; and (b) the execution of an order in respect of property situated within Canada.
The property of an offender may be used to satisfy the operation of a provision of this or any other Act of Parliament respecting the forfeiture of property only to the extent that it is not required to satisfy the operation of any other provision of this or any other Act of Parliament respecting restitution to or compensation of persons affected by the commission of offences.
목차
Ⅰ. 서문
Ⅱ. 캐나다 범죄수익법의 구조
Ⅲ. 수익 몰수제도의 세부내용
Ⅳ. 종합 및 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1999 / 각국의 몰수제도
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1990-051990 / Money laundering in Canada
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1996 / Criminal Conspiracies-Organized Crime in Canada
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1994 / A practical guide to the new legislation
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1997 / The Practical Guide to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1990-051990 / Money laundering in Canada
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1996 / Criminal Conspiracies-Organized Crime in Canada
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1994 / A practical guide to the new legislation
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1997 / The Practical Guide to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
경합범의 성립과 처벌
비교형사법연구
2004 .01
-
캐나다의 불법수익 몰수체계 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2003 .12
-
약물범죄수익몰수제도에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
1993 .12
-
조직범죄에 대한 형사제재로서의 범죄수익몰수
법학논총
2011 .02
-
범죄수익 몰수․추징제도의 문제점과 개선방안
형사법연구
2014 .01
-
不法收益沒收制度의 刑事法的 硏究
법학연구
2006 .08
-
성폭력범죄자의 신상공개제도에 관한 비판적 소고 -‘아동⋅청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률’을 중심으로-
일감법학
2012 .01
-
藥物犯罪收益剝奪을 위한 金融部門의 役割에 관한 硏究
형사정책연구
1993 .06
-
민사몰수제도의 도입에 관한 연구
피해자학연구
2011 .01
-
범죄수익 몰수자산기금 도입방안 : 각국의 입법동향과 우리나라에의 시사점
형사정책연구
2007 .09
-
藥物犯罪收益沒收制度에 관한 基礎的 考察
형사정책연구
1994 .09
-
미국형법상 착오의 유형과 그 내용
홍익법학
2015 .01
-
사후적 경합범과 법원의 양형재량권
형사법연구
2010 .01
-
기업범죄의 범죄수익에 관한 몰수 및 추징의 실효성 확보방안
비교형사법연구
2013 .01
-
형법개정안상 공소제기 없는 몰수의 해석과 집행절차에 관한 연구 : 법적 성격과 적용범위를 중심으로
형사정책연구
2015 .06
-
살인범죄 양형기준 고찰 - ‘범죄유형화’와 ‘특별양형인자’를 중심으로-
홍익법학
2017 .01
-
몰수 관련 특별법의 분석과 통합방안
법학논집
2009 .01
-
범죄수익환수법안과 민사몰수제도에 관한 몇 가지 검토
법학연구
2015 .04
-
“디지털 성범죄” 관련 정부대책과 개선방안
동북아법연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003957073