지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Upon application of the United States, the court may enter a restraining order or injunction, require the execution of a satisfactory performance bond, or take any other action to preserve the availability of property for forfeiture. Especially, according to criminal Procedure Law of the New York, when the court directs that the defendant be imprisoned until the mandatory surcharge, it must specify a maximum period of imprisonment not to exceed fifteen days. Also, Upon application of the United Kingdom, if the Crown Court imposes a fine on any person or forfeits his recognizance, the court shall make an order fixing a term of imprisonment or of detention under section 108 above (detention of persons aged 18 to 20 for default) which he is to undergo if any sum which he is liable to pay is not duly paid or recovered.
But, If any of the property has been transferred or sold to, deposited with a third party in Korea, the court shall just order the forfeiture of any other property of the defendant up to the value of any property. So, many defendant don't follow the order of the court, even if they have the money to pay.
So, I insist that in default of payment of the forfeiture the offender should be suffer imprisonment for a certain term, which imprisonment shall be in excess of any other imprisonment to which he may be sentenced or to which he may be liable under a commutation of a sentence. And if the defendant serves a term of imprisonment or detention in default of payment any amount due under a confiscation order, his serving that term does not prevent the confiscation order from continuing to have effect so far as any other method of enforcement should be concerned.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0