지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Sim-Duk-Zam (henceforth Sim) made the settlement of theories which are focused on the ethnic values among confucianal poetics. He also inherited the reactive tone of an argument from Chil-za-pa, a school which are made up of seven people, while he established a new style of poetics based on one's character by absorbing Wang Sa Jong's “Sin-Un-Sul”, a kind of theory and Jeon-Gum-Ik and Sub-sub's study of poetics. This reactive tone of an argument has been inherited for several hundreds since the end of Song Dynasty. But his poetics has not been attended as much as its importance because his poetics was regarded as a model of feudal poetics.
For with all, his “Go-Si-Won”, and “O-Jo-Si-Bul-Jae-Jib” have been one of the most frequently referred books. And many theories and various poetics are founded on his poetics which were made at that time. In this study I would like to analyse his importance of Dufu's poetry and the criticism of Dufu's poetry among his study of poetics because the origin and spirit of his poetics are concentrated in the study of Dufu's peotry. Sim is considered the settler of the theory of “Geok-Jo-Sul” And Geok means the correspondence of poetry to the standard And Jo means the correspondence of both rhythm and tone in poetry. It seems that the reactive trend makes him follow the high and old tone and style in poetry. And poetry in the periods of Han, Wi and Tang dynasties are respected as orthodox by Sim. Dufu's poetry are harmonized with the view point of Sim's “Geok-Jo-Sul”, because Dufu's peotry have changes as well as follow the tradition. I try to find the origion of Dufu's poetry through Sim's critics of Dufu's poetry which are modest in satirising people, so to speak “On-Yu-Don-Hu”.
Sim argues that Dufu's poetry recapitulated the works of the former poets and their origin was in “Pung-Ah” tradition in “Si-Keong” and that the role of Dufu's poetry is realizing “On-Yu-Don-Hu”, which means satirising people with modesty, and he also argues that the ground of the formal achievement of Dufu's poetry is in the freedom of style and tone in creating poetry.
I select some of Sim's critics about Dufu's poetry to get an objective result because this is apt to be subjective and I also generalize Sim's achievement of his study of Dufu's poetry through three arguments mentioned the above.
For with all, his “Go-Si-Won”, and “O-Jo-Si-Bul-Jae-Jib” have been one of the most frequently referred books. And many theories and various poetics are founded on his poetics which were made at that time. In this study I would like to analyse his importance of Dufu's poetry and the criticism of Dufu's poetry among his study of poetics because the origin and spirit of his poetics are concentrated in the study of Dufu's peotry. Sim is considered the settler of the theory of “Geok-Jo-Sul” And Geok means the correspondence of poetry to the standard And Jo means the correspondence of both rhythm and tone in poetry. It seems that the reactive trend makes him follow the high and old tone and style in poetry. And poetry in the periods of Han, Wi and Tang dynasties are respected as orthodox by Sim. Dufu's poetry are harmonized with the view point of Sim's “Geok-Jo-Sul”, because Dufu's peotry have changes as well as follow the tradition. I try to find the origion of Dufu's poetry through Sim's critics of Dufu's poetry which are modest in satirising people, so to speak “On-Yu-Don-Hu”.
Sim argues that Dufu's poetry recapitulated the works of the former poets and their origin was in “Pung-Ah” tradition in “Si-Keong” and that the role of Dufu's poetry is realizing “On-Yu-Don-Hu”, which means satirising people with modesty, and he also argues that the ground of the formal achievement of Dufu's poetry is in the freedom of style and tone in creating poetry.
I select some of Sim's critics about Dufu's poetry to get an objective result because this is apt to be subjective and I also generalize Sim's achievement of his study of Dufu's poetry through three arguments mentioned the above.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 沈德潛의 著述속에 드러난 基本 認識
Ⅲ. 沈德潛의 杜甫詩 論評
Ⅳ. 結論
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
杜甫詩 批評語 考察
외국문학연구
2002 .02
-
『당시별재집(唐詩別裁集)』에 채록된두보(杜甫) 시에 대한 ‘흥관군원(興觀群怨)’ 표출 양상 고찰
퇴계학논집
2020 .01
-
門類本 杜甫詩集을 통해 본 知的 전통의 균열
중국어문학
2018 .01
-
杜甫와 杜詩에 대한 사랑의 역사
중국문학
2004 .01
-
沈佺期詩硏究
중국문학
2006 .01
-
“赋兼比兴”的构成、变形与文学意义
중국문학
2016 .01
-
Poetry : A Consideration of What Makes Poetry 'Poetry'
한신인문학연구
2001 .12
-
论杜甫诗歌的文化传承力
동아인문학
2014 .04
-
Korean Poetry Today
Korea Journal
1962 .08
-
Korean Poetry Today
Korea Journal
1972 .02
-
朴寅煥 詩의 모더니티와 詩史的 意味
어문론집
2011 .11
-
두보가 만난 사람 - 干謁과 知音 사이
온지논총
2018 .01
-
杜詩의 句法과 字法 연구
중국문학
2003 .01
-
리얼리즘 시와 시론의 창조적 수용
한국시학연구
2000 .11
-
杜甫의 詩에 나타난 내면적 갈등에 대한 분석
중국어문학논집
1998 .08
-
戱“婉諷戱語”勝黃鍾-論杜甫“戱”題詩的交際功能
인문과학연구
2011 .09
-
1970년대 한국 현대시의 계보와 유형 연구를 위한 시론
우리문학연구
2008 .06
-
전쟁체험과 談論 主體의 존재방식 : 詩論과 詩의 관계를 중심으로 -朴寅煥論-
우리문학연구
2004 .12
-
韓國 現代詩의 詩語와 詩意識 硏究
한국시학연구
2002 .05
-
새로운 미디어의 융합을 통한 시 교육
영어영문학연구
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-705-003609220