지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the paper, I reviewed the evolutionary process of international financial structure, for the first, Based on the understanding of recent development of financial system, the argument of levying Tobin tax is judged in an effort to mitigate the turbulent factors causing international financial instability.
More than anything else, speculative motives of international capital mobility resulted from an affluent amount of liquidity letting financial volatility pump up and down. In line with this changing financial atmosphere, financial regime transition from sound banking to universal banking added electric sparks to rich amount of fuel. Before the transition, original function of banking system stems from exchange services which stress the importance of financial safety and soundness for the top priority. It is, however, little prudent to take a sharp turn to profit seeking asset operating services such as investment banking and private banking with little attention or understanding of side effect of active portfolio management. Hybrid financial products coined by financial innovation technology made it difficult to assess or check the severity of risk taking. Finanally, early warning system of internal complice system in financial institutes came almost to a holt.
In the paper, I tried to evaluate the effect of introducing Tobin tax as a social safety net increasing stability of financial industry in one part and to minimize moral hazard behavior in order not to taking excess risks as a precautionary measures in financial industries. Until recently, there has been a variety of views and arguments on the pros and cons of introducing Tobin tax. For simplicity, they have two alternatives, in common in the form of Tobin Tax. The one is levying Tobin Tax as Financial Stability Contribution(FSC) and the other option is in the form of Financial Activity Tax(FAT). More recently, Basel Committee also showed up its supervisionary alternatives in the name of contingent capital. I concluded that I have a doubt of levying Tobin tax to curb off financial crisis, and suggested to take time to study more on the topic of Tobin Tax.
More than anything else, speculative motives of international capital mobility resulted from an affluent amount of liquidity letting financial volatility pump up and down. In line with this changing financial atmosphere, financial regime transition from sound banking to universal banking added electric sparks to rich amount of fuel. Before the transition, original function of banking system stems from exchange services which stress the importance of financial safety and soundness for the top priority. It is, however, little prudent to take a sharp turn to profit seeking asset operating services such as investment banking and private banking with little attention or understanding of side effect of active portfolio management. Hybrid financial products coined by financial innovation technology made it difficult to assess or check the severity of risk taking. Finanally, early warning system of internal complice system in financial institutes came almost to a holt.
In the paper, I tried to evaluate the effect of introducing Tobin tax as a social safety net increasing stability of financial industry in one part and to minimize moral hazard behavior in order not to taking excess risks as a precautionary measures in financial industries. Until recently, there has been a variety of views and arguments on the pros and cons of introducing Tobin tax. For simplicity, they have two alternatives, in common in the form of Tobin Tax. The one is levying Tobin Tax as Financial Stability Contribution(FSC) and the other option is in the form of Financial Activity Tax(FAT). More recently, Basel Committee also showed up its supervisionary alternatives in the name of contingent capital. I concluded that I have a doubt of levying Tobin tax to curb off financial crisis, and suggested to take time to study more on the topic of Tobin Tax.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 금융제도의 변화에 따른 금융위기의 대두
Ⅲ. 금융위기에 대한 각국의 대응방안
Ⅳ. 금융거래안정화를 위한 토빈세의 도입
Ⅴ. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
금융상품과 공격적 조세회피사례
조세학술논집
2011 .02
-
글로벌금융의 폭력과 금융통제의 구상 : 토빈세를 중심으로
시민과세계
2002 .09
-
무형자산투자가 Tobin's Q에 미치는 영향
대한경영학회지
1999 .12
-
제주 금융허브 육성을 위한 세제전략 : 홍콩 및 상해에 대응한 경쟁력 제고 전략
조세학술논집
2012 .02
-
Inflation and Capital Stock in The Long Run
Journal of Economic Research (JER)
2010 .01
-
Estimating Tobin’s Q for Listed Firms in Korea (1980-2005): Comparing Alternative Approaches and an Experiment with Investment Functions
Seoul Journal of Economics
2015 .01
-
中國金融交易增值稅課稅問題研究
조세법연구
2012 .12
-
거래세 부과를 통한 국제금융거래의 규제 검토 : 국내의 외환거래세 입법 논의를 중심으로
법학연구
2015 .09
-
부상하고 있는 외환거래세(일명:Tobin tax)도입 논의
[BOK] 주간해외경제
1995 .04
-
글로벌 금융위기와 금융서비스 개방의 관련성에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2009 .08
-
우리 나라 금융기관의 금융정보화에 대한 연구
국제회계연구
2003 .10
-
Understanding the Silence amid Turmoil : The Tobin Tax and East Asia
한국사회과학연구
2003 .06
-
‘97년 체제’ 와 한국경제 : 토빈세 논의의 함의
지역사회연구
2006 .09
-
기업의 소유구조가 Tobin의 Q비율에 미치는 영향
대한경영학회지
2000 .09
-
금융서비스의 무역거버넌스 전략
통상정보연구
2009 .12
-
21C 세계금융위기의 원인과 자본시장법의 과제
경영법률
2009 .01
-
지방자치단체 통합재정정보시스템 구축에 대한 평가
한국지방재정논집
2005 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-329-003687695