지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article deals how reclaimed land, Seokjang-dun[石場屯] in Ansan County came to be integrated into the modern land ownership. By investing money and labor, civilians could hold title to the new lands, on each gyeol[結] of which were levied 100 dus[1 du[斗] is almost equivalent to 18 litters] of rough rice or 40 dus of polished rice by the competent authorities.
During the modern reform period at the end of the nineteenth century, the State did not acknowledge Seokjang-dun as private land. Moreover, it raise the tax on it by the Gabbo Reform[甲午改革] years. Seokjang-dun had to face the crisis of nationalization when the government of the Daehan Empire aggressively carried forward the policy of expanding national land. But it came to be registered in the Gwangmu Terrier[光武量案] and its civilian holders, accepted as virtual owners, officially acquired the private ownership. The original level of taxation also was maintained without any change.
But as the Residency-General of the Imperial Japan, by adopting a new concept of the National Land, absorbed the farms which were created with the participation of official agencies, Seokjang-dun was nationalized. At that time, the right of the State toward each farm was not so clear: whether it was a tax levying one or an ownership, or something in the middle of these two. Nevertheless, the holders of the farms unfortunately included in the list of the national lands were forced to accepted a tenancy contract with the State. The case of Seokjang-dun was no exception.
Later, land holders in Seokjang-dun managed to secure modern ownership through new assessments done by the Land Survey Project. But it should be noted that these “100 dus of rough rice” type farmers, despite bearing the almost same level of tax burden as the officially approved landowners, had to suffer real hardships until they could get land ownership, where nearby civilian farms’ ownerships were being bought and sold since about two hundred years. Modern land readjustment was proceeded in favor of the State, in which the Japanese Imperialism played an leading role.
During the modern reform period at the end of the nineteenth century, the State did not acknowledge Seokjang-dun as private land. Moreover, it raise the tax on it by the Gabbo Reform[甲午改革] years. Seokjang-dun had to face the crisis of nationalization when the government of the Daehan Empire aggressively carried forward the policy of expanding national land. But it came to be registered in the Gwangmu Terrier[光武量案] and its civilian holders, accepted as virtual owners, officially acquired the private ownership. The original level of taxation also was maintained without any change.
But as the Residency-General of the Imperial Japan, by adopting a new concept of the National Land, absorbed the farms which were created with the participation of official agencies, Seokjang-dun was nationalized. At that time, the right of the State toward each farm was not so clear: whether it was a tax levying one or an ownership, or something in the middle of these two. Nevertheless, the holders of the farms unfortunately included in the list of the national lands were forced to accepted a tenancy contract with the State. The case of Seokjang-dun was no exception.
Later, land holders in Seokjang-dun managed to secure modern ownership through new assessments done by the Land Survey Project. But it should be noted that these “100 dus of rough rice” type farmers, despite bearing the almost same level of tax burden as the officially approved landowners, had to suffer real hardships until they could get land ownership, where nearby civilian farms’ ownerships were being bought and sold since about two hundred years. Modern land readjustment was proceeded in favor of the State, in which the Japanese Imperialism played an leading role.
목차
머리말
1. 갑오개혁 이후 토지조사와 석장둔의 위상변화
2. 일제의 토지조사와 석장둔 처리
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한말 일제초기 공토 정책과 국유민유 분쟁
한국민족문화
2012 .11
-
Land Reform and Colonial Land Legislation in Korea, 1894–1910
Korea Journal
2014 .09
-
경남 창원지역 토지조사의 시행과정과 장부체계의 변화
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
고려시대 토지소유관계 재론
역사와현실
2006 .12
-
조선후기 경상도 지역 양반층의 토지소유규모와 지가의 변동
역사와경계
2010 .12
-
白南雲의 토지소유론과 그 시대적 의미 : 《朝鮮封建社會經濟史(上)》을 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
[특집3 : 토지조사사업 연구] 조선토지조사사업 연구의 과제와 시론적 검토
역사와현실
2003 .12
-
한말 명례궁장토의 운영과 국가의 소유권 정리 : 충청남도 아산군 이서면 우평 명례궁장토를 중심으로
한국민족문화
2015 .05
-
중국의 도시화와 공공토지 사유화
역사비평
2016 .08
-
공공성의 관점에서 본 한국 토지보유세의 역사와 의미
역사비평
2011 .02
-
秦˙漢의 土地所有制
중국사연구
2010 .01
-
조선토지조사사업에서 국유지의 조사와 활용 : 경남 창원지역 사례를 통해서
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
20세기 후반 고려 전시과 연구의 定礎 : 《高麗土地制度史硏究》를 통해본 강진철의 연구 성과와 의의
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
조선후기 양반층의 토지소유규모 변화
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .05
-
The Legal Nature of Land Ownership in the Yi Dynasty
Korea Journal
1975 .10
-
대한제국기 김가진의 충주지역 토지 소유와 의의
한국독립운동사연구
2017 .05
-
These People in This Land
Korea Journal
1971 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003636703