지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The problems on father and son has been many themes for literature work regardless of the East and the West as well as acient and modern times. Especially the existence of father is the first important character in human’s mind and the subject representing standard of life. Traditional concept focusing on outside by father has been influenced on our lives while such a father’s feature has been become to ‘lost existence’ in the 20th century. However, father’s existence is still in realities of life. Also it is certain that it does not exist. as there is substance of father while there is an absence as public existence.
The discourse on ‘Father’, which is called ‘Oidipus’, is considered as the absolute one in Korean literature. ‘Father has not only the personal/biological meaning but also symbolic meaning of law/ ruler/truth/super-ego and so on. The son’s perspective on ‘Father’ can be revealed through ‘Oidipus Complex’-the fear of castration, an illegitimate child or adopted child.
I would like to suggest that the discourse on ‘Father-Son’ relationship in Korean literature has assumed the new aspect from 1980’s to 1990’s through 〈Kaeheulaekkun〉 by Kim So Jin. The feature of Father in 〈Kaeheulaekkun〉 is ‘who is spiritless personal being in public’, which is revealed by the job of mating dogs. The son in 1980’s Korean literature is trying to make new feature of Father by denying one’s father or castrating the being. But the try would be transfered to ‘Sympathy’ by understanding/experiencing the inability of one’s father who has suffered from the state of war and has lost his hometown and had to survive. ‘The new feature of Father’ has created in mid-90’s Korean literature. The discourse on “Father” is no longer “public being” but is “private being” in 1990’s Korean literature. But it is not easy to repatriat to completed father.
When the Cold war system was falling down and the Postmodernism was emerging, the father was falling deeper by women writers who never took a key role before. The 2000s has come but the father has not been able to return where they used to belong. In 2005, the father finally regained what they used to have through the book 〈Run Father〉 written by Kim, Aae Ran but it could be done by using ‘imagination’. There are abitdifferences between the 2000 sand the 90s.The father is taking back by the daughter. For the father who is not a public enemy anymore, the illegitimate daughter, who were thinking of putting sunglasses on the father, finalized having the father retuning back with sympathy. There turning back of the father is not taking hard, refuse neither eradication but things are not so different. This could happen since everybody around is warm of the father. The father just needs tool.
In 2008, father returns back by 〈Father’s Privacy〉 written by Seo Ha Jin. But fater comes back as ‘a representative family’. Such a father shows his personal life by 〈Mask〉. Even Masked Father using mask, he can not be satisfied with equality between gender society. He needs more life- energy so writer sublimates an affair in sympathy but father still needs mask to have personal life.
Overall, we look over change of personal father figure from after 90’s Korean novels. Interesting thing is that Change of Stature of Father has been affected by many external aspects. Moreover, in returning of father, presence of father has been changed by external views of sons or daughters, itself. Therefore, we cannot deny that external aspects of Father affect rebuilding of father figure rather than change of father itself. In the way of returning of father, Father becomes 〈Kaeheulaekkun〉, 〈Running Father〉 and 〈Father in Mask〉, eventually. Once we can judge that position of father is insignificant and pity throughout them, it is important that change of others’ point of view takes priority for acceptance of father. At the age of the father with the existance and absence but does not revert to patriarchal discipline, hope this study will be a key process to find out the father existing in the surface of the human.
The discourse on ‘Father’, which is called ‘Oidipus’, is considered as the absolute one in Korean literature. ‘Father has not only the personal/biological meaning but also symbolic meaning of law/ ruler/truth/super-ego and so on. The son’s perspective on ‘Father’ can be revealed through ‘Oidipus Complex’-the fear of castration, an illegitimate child or adopted child.
I would like to suggest that the discourse on ‘Father-Son’ relationship in Korean literature has assumed the new aspect from 1980’s to 1990’s through 〈Kaeheulaekkun〉 by Kim So Jin. The feature of Father in 〈Kaeheulaekkun〉 is ‘who is spiritless personal being in public’, which is revealed by the job of mating dogs. The son in 1980’s Korean literature is trying to make new feature of Father by denying one’s father or castrating the being. But the try would be transfered to ‘Sympathy’ by understanding/experiencing the inability of one’s father who has suffered from the state of war and has lost his hometown and had to survive. ‘The new feature of Father’ has created in mid-90’s Korean literature. The discourse on “Father” is no longer “public being” but is “private being” in 1990’s Korean literature. But it is not easy to repatriat to completed father.
When the Cold war system was falling down and the Postmodernism was emerging, the father was falling deeper by women writers who never took a key role before. The 2000s has come but the father has not been able to return where they used to belong. In 2005, the father finally regained what they used to have through the book 〈Run Father〉 written by Kim, Aae Ran but it could be done by using ‘imagination’. There are abitdifferences between the 2000 sand the 90s.The father is taking back by the daughter. For the father who is not a public enemy anymore, the illegitimate daughter, who were thinking of putting sunglasses on the father, finalized having the father retuning back with sympathy. There turning back of the father is not taking hard, refuse neither eradication but things are not so different. This could happen since everybody around is warm of the father. The father just needs tool.
In 2008, father returns back by 〈Father’s Privacy〉 written by Seo Ha Jin. But fater comes back as ‘a representative family’. Such a father shows his personal life by 〈Mask〉. Even Masked Father using mask, he can not be satisfied with equality between gender society. He needs more life- energy so writer sublimates an affair in sympathy but father still needs mask to have personal life.
Overall, we look over change of personal father figure from after 90’s Korean novels. Interesting thing is that Change of Stature of Father has been affected by many external aspects. Moreover, in returning of father, presence of father has been changed by external views of sons or daughters, itself. Therefore, we cannot deny that external aspects of Father affect rebuilding of father figure rather than change of father itself. In the way of returning of father, Father becomes 〈Kaeheulaekkun〉, 〈Running Father〉 and 〈Father in Mask〉, eventually. Once we can judge that position of father is insignificant and pity throughout them, it is important that change of others’ point of view takes priority for acceptance of father. At the age of the father with the existance and absence but does not revert to patriarchal discipline, hope this study will be a key process to find out the father existing in the surface of the human.
목차
1. 서론
2. 공적인 아버지와 사적인 아버지의 양상
3. 아들이 거세한 아버지의 귀환 : 「개흘레꾼」
4. 딸을 통한 아버지 되찾기
5. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (44)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 김소진 / 1995 / 개흘레꾼 in:고아떤 뺑덕어멈 / 솔출판사
2. [단행본] - 김애란 / 2005 / 달려라 아비 / 창비
3. [단행본] - 서하진 / 2008 / 아빠의 사생활 in:착한 가족 / 문학과지성사
4. [단행본] - 김동석 / 2005 / 달려라 작가-생의 도약과 영원회귀의 잠재적 공존 in:달려라 아비 / 창비
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김미현 / 2005 / 한국 근·현대 베스트셀러 문학에 나타난 독서의 사회사 -1980~1990년대 소설의 ‘아버지’ 담론을 중심으로 / 비교문학 (36) : 189 ~ 218
2. [단행본] - 김애란 / 2005 / 달려라 아비 / 창비
3. [단행본] - 서하진 / 2008 / 아빠의 사생활 in:착한 가족 / 문학과지성사
4. [단행본] - 김동석 / 2005 / 달려라 작가-생의 도약과 영원회귀의 잠재적 공존 in:달려라 아비 / 창비
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김미현 / 2005 / 한국 근·현대 베스트셀러 문학에 나타난 독서의 사회사 -1980~1990년대 소설의 ‘아버지’ 담론을 중심으로 / 비교문학 (36) : 189 ~ 218
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
My Father
Korea Journal
1983 .11
-
윌리 로먼의 자화상 : 아버지의 부재라는 트로마
현대영미드라마
2003 .12
-
The Glass Menagerie : 부재하는 아버지 되살리기
현대영미드라마
2002 .08
-
Father and Son
Korea Journal
1972 .07
-
Desiring my Father's Death : Fathers and Children in Shakespeare
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
2000 .02
-
뢰트키 시에 나타나는 아버지의 상징적 의미
영어영문학연구
2010 .01
-
남성 한부모의 자녀교육사역에 대한 실천신학적 접근
신학연구
2012 .06
-
Fathering in Christian Education
Journal of Christian Education & Information Technology
2006 .10
-
대하소설에 나타나는 부모-자녀 관계 연구 －잘못한 자녀에 대한 부/모의 태도를 중심으로－
국어국문학
2019 .12
-
Pathos of a Father
신학연구
1987 .09
-
His Father’s Keeper
Korea Journal
1992 .06
-
A Study of the Terms for ‘father’ in Gothic
어학연구
2005 .12
-
아버지 찾기 야담의 서사 전통 계승과 변용
국어국문학
2014 .06
-
유아의 정서지능과 아버지의 양육행동과의 관계
생애학회지
2011 .01
-
조선후기 시가에 나타난 부권 상실의 흔적들
韓國古典硏究
2019 .01
-
The (In)visible Father in Exile : O'Casey's The Drums of Father Ned
신영어영문학
1999 .11
-
아버지의 부재와 역사적 외상
제임스조이스 저널
2007 .01
-
The College Admission and the Family : Centering on the Role of the Father
Korea Journal
1995 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국 영화에 나타난 아버지 캐릭터의 부성성에 대한 기호학적 연구
이윤석
,
김슬기
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2011
.02
신자유주의화 이후의 아버지 역할 변화 : 시장, 가족 변화에 대한 논의를 중심으로
조윤경
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2008
.06
영아에 대한 아버지애착 관련변인
황현주
한국영유아보육학
2012
.12
아버지의 우울과 부부관계 및 자녀양육방식이 유아의 문제행동에 미치는 영향
장진영
,
김진희
,
김영희
교육과학연구
2011
.08
아버지의 양육행동에 영향을 미치는 변인에 관한 연구
채진영
가정과삶의질연구
2011
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-809-003031910