지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper attempts to disclose the implications of Beilis's case, a trial happened at the period of increasing opposition to the authority of the Russian autocracy. Rather than focusing on racial conflicts and religious rituals inherent in the case, I'm trying to put it in the context of the maneuver of Russian conservative forces, who thought that they could extend the lives of the autocracy by exploiting the implied meaning of the case.
If Beilis was found guilty, the conservative forces thought that they could extend the prosecution against the Jews, who from their viewpoints were involved in various kinds of revolutionary movements. Beilis's case with passing of the time was not a simple murder case only attentive to the small group of people in the region. It might be the case contributing to strengthening power of the autocracy. In order to bring back the stability of the Russian tsardom, the conservative forces did not hesitate to ignore righteous legal procedures such as selecting qualified juries and guaranteeing the rights of the defendant. They could carry out such unlawful acts with the collaboration of high officials and Nicolas Ⅱ's tacit approval.
In spite of the efforts from supporters to the autocracy, Beilis after all was released from the prison. The royal forces were greatly disappointed with the final verdict. But it could not be interpreted as their total defeat. The argument that the religious rituals of Jews were the principal reason to the death of innocent Russian youth was accepted. After all the Jews were turned out to be harmful elements to the stability of the Russian society and lives of Russian people.
It was difficult for the Russian autocracy to disregard the hatred against the Jews advocated by the right political forces such as the Union of Russian People and Black Hundreds, because they were the active supporters for the declining regime. They attempted to find chances of fight back to the opposing groups by expanding the implicit meaning of Beilis's case. However, the Russian autocracy could not have enough time to exploit the potential of Beilis's case for the defense of the regime as it slided into the First World War.
If Beilis was found guilty, the conservative forces thought that they could extend the prosecution against the Jews, who from their viewpoints were involved in various kinds of revolutionary movements. Beilis's case with passing of the time was not a simple murder case only attentive to the small group of people in the region. It might be the case contributing to strengthening power of the autocracy. In order to bring back the stability of the Russian tsardom, the conservative forces did not hesitate to ignore righteous legal procedures such as selecting qualified juries and guaranteeing the rights of the defendant. They could carry out such unlawful acts with the collaboration of high officials and Nicolas Ⅱ's tacit approval.
In spite of the efforts from supporters to the autocracy, Beilis after all was released from the prison. The royal forces were greatly disappointed with the final verdict. But it could not be interpreted as their total defeat. The argument that the religious rituals of Jews were the principal reason to the death of innocent Russian youth was accepted. After all the Jews were turned out to be harmful elements to the stability of the Russian society and lives of Russian people.
It was difficult for the Russian autocracy to disregard the hatred against the Jews advocated by the right political forces such as the Union of Russian People and Black Hundreds, because they were the active supporters for the declining regime. They attempted to find chances of fight back to the opposing groups by expanding the implicit meaning of Beilis's case. However, the Russian autocracy could not have enough time to exploit the potential of Beilis's case for the defense of the regime as it slided into the First World War.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 단순 살해사건에서 유대인에 대한 증오로 비화
Ⅲ. 중앙 정치권력의 대응
Ⅳ. 보수 정치단체들의 선동
Ⅴ. 끝맺는 말
參考文獻
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
러시아 군주정의 반격 : 베일리스 사건을 중심으로
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2010 .05
-
러시아 군주정의 구원투수- 러시아 민족동맹의 형성과 전략을 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2009 .06
-
러시아 군주정의 구원투수 : 러시아 민족동맹의 형성과 활동을 중심으로
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2009 .05
-
Russian Diaspora in Central Asia: Russian Compatriots and the Russian government’s policy toward the Russian Diaspora
전남대학교 글로벌디아스포라연구소 국제학술회의
2008 .01
-
Post-Russian Eurasia and the proto-Eurasian usage of the Runet in Kazakhstan: A plea for a cyberlinguistic turn in area studies
Journal of Eurasian Studies
2011 .01
-
러시아 경제체제전환에 관한 고찰
경영경제
2003 .08
-
중국공산당 창당과정에 나타나는 러시아 혁명가들 : 보이틴스키 일행의 중국 방문 이전을 중심으로
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2008 .04
-
러시아 현대 독자와 논어
동북아 문화연구
2010 .12
-
The Russian Revolution and Identity Trajectories for the Russian Diaspora in Harbin, China
전남대학교 글로벌디아스포라연구소 국내학술회의
2019 .06
-
러시아 금융시장과 국제유가의 상호연관성에 관한 연구: 그랜저 인과성 검증을 중심으로
기업경영연구
2018 .01
-
2012 러시아 대선 결과 분석과 중산층의 정치세력화 가능성
정치정보연구
2012 .06
-
China and Japan in the Russian Imagination, 1685-1922
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2013 .01
-
푸틴의 전쟁과 러시아 전략 사상
국가전략
2016 .01
-
1760-1825년 러시아의 대영 무역정책의 변화와 영국의 원자재 확보의 다변화
러시아연구
2007 .01
-
투르크메니스탄에서 러시아어의 지위변화
동북아 문화연구
2008 .06
-
Multicultural competence : Russian case compared with Korea
한국언론학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2012 .10
-
러시아 조직범죄집단과 한국의 형사정책적 대응방안 (2009)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-910-003183697