지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The landownership structure and land purchase/sale customs in place during late Chas?n were very similar to the ones which formed in the Western world and Japan in the aftermath of modernization-oriented reforms. In the case of the Western countries and Japan, the formation of exclusivity in terms of landownership and market-friendly land purchase/sale customs progressed in conjunction with political reforms. However, in the case of Chas?n, the landownership structure and land purchase/sale customs had already been established by the 17th century, or before the advent of modernization- oriented reforms. Thus, the same landownership structure and land purchase/sale customs which progressed as part of the march towards "modernity" or capitalism in the West also developed in Chas?n. However, these phenomena did not occur in conjunction with modernity or capitalism in the Korean case, but on their own. This implies that economic and political modernity do not emerge simultaneously, nor do these two phenomena progress in a closely intertwined manner. In other words, the belief that all aspects of a society must change in a homogenous fashion that has been derived from Western experiences should not be perceived as a one-size fits all rule.
In addition, the landownership system of Chas?n revolved around exclusively established ownership rights. To this end, landowner-tenant farmer relations resembled more of an economic contract than a relationship between a dominant and a subordinate power. This was very similar to the landlord system which formed and developed in England, France, and Japan after their modernization-oriented reforms.
Chas?n's landownership structure and land purchase/sale customs were very different from not only the West and Japan, but China as well. China was much faster to adopt private ownership and the purchase/sale of land than Chas?n. However, by the Qing dynasty, which held away during the period right before the advent of modernity, the landownership structure was based on a hierarchical system, and the purchase/sale of land was very non-market and non-capitalist in nature. Viewed from this standpoint, the recent "Theory of East Asian Society" can be regarded as oversimplifying or purely ignoring the differences between the three countries. The fact that these differences were closely related to the characteristics of the new political cultures which took root during the strategic transition to modernity makes it evident that a new approach to the study of land ownership in East Asia is required.
In addition, the landownership system of Chas?n revolved around exclusively established ownership rights. To this end, landowner-tenant farmer relations resembled more of an economic contract than a relationship between a dominant and a subordinate power. This was very similar to the landlord system which formed and developed in England, France, and Japan after their modernization-oriented reforms.
Chas?n's landownership structure and land purchase/sale customs were very different from not only the West and Japan, but China as well. China was much faster to adopt private ownership and the purchase/sale of land than Chas?n. However, by the Qing dynasty, which held away during the period right before the advent of modernity, the landownership structure was based on a hierarchical system, and the purchase/sale of land was very non-market and non-capitalist in nature. Viewed from this standpoint, the recent "Theory of East Asian Society" can be regarded as oversimplifying or purely ignoring the differences between the three countries. The fact that these differences were closely related to the characteristics of the new political cultures which took root during the strategic transition to modernity makes it evident that a new approach to the study of land ownership in East Asia is required.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 불ㆍ영ㆍ중ㆍ일의 토지소유구조와 매매관습
Ⅲ. 조선의 토지소유구조와 매매관습
Ⅳ. 서구중심적 한국사 이해와 동아시아 역사상의 재검토
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (52)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
19세기 조선과 베트남의 토지개혁론에 대한 비교사적 검토 : 토지소유를 둘러싼 제도와 관습의 차이를 중심으로
역사학보
2010 .06
-
농지개혁 진행과정과 정부․지주․농민의 입장 ―경기도 광주군 남종면 사례를 중심으로
대동문화연구
2011 .01
-
Colonial Modernity and the Investigation of Land Customs : A Comparison of Japan, Taiwan, and Korea
Korea Journal
2004 .06
-
서유럽의 고전적 봉건제 발달지역에서 영주적 대토지소유제는 어떻게 형성되었는가?
역사교육
2001 .09
-
조선후기 경상도 지역 양반층의 토지소유규모와 지가의 변동
역사와경계
2010 .12
-
중국의 도시화와 공공토지 사유화
역사비평
2016 .08
-
Land Reform and Colonial Land Legislation in Korea, 1894–1910
Korea Journal
2014 .09
-
新羅統一期 私的土地所有關係의 展開
역사학보
2000 .03
-
조선후기 求禮 文化柳氏家의 土地賣買明文에 관한 연구
古文書硏究
2008 .01
-
일제시기 일본인 지주의 토지확대와 소유 변동의 추이 -전북 옥구군 서수면 사례-
동방학지
2005 .01
-
조선후기 제주지역 土地賣買 연구
장서각
2017 .04
-
경남 창원지역 토지조사의 시행과정과 장부체계의 변화
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
조선후기 양반층의 토지소유규모 변화
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .05
-
被占領地 土地改革에 관한 硏究― 報恩郡 懷南面 事例
대동문화연구
2019 .01
-
秦˙漢의 土地所有制
중국사연구
2010 .01
-
일제하 토지회수운동의 전개과정 : 전남 무안군 하의도의 사례
한국독립운동사연구
2002 .12
-
고려시대 토지소유관계 재론
역사와현실
2006 .12
-
공공성의 관점에서 본 한국 토지보유세의 역사와 의미
역사비평
2011 .02
-
일제시대사 연구의 새로운 가능성, Gragert, Edwin H., Landownership under Colonial Rule : Korea's Japanese Experience, 1900-1935 (University of Hawaii Press, 1994)의 서평에 대신하여
서강인문논총
1997 .03
-
明ㆍ淸時代 地主制 研究의 몇가지 問題에 대하여
역사와 세계
1990 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-003101078