지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Corporate governance has been heavily discussed and a notable subject worldwide in recent years, and SOEs in Korea have been condemned like as an avatar of inefficiency and moral hazard, even though they have been making huge contribution to national economy. Thus, this dissertation is to research better ways of improving operations of SOEs in Korea in terms of corporate governance under the structure of the 'SOEs' Operations Act' of 2007. which was enacted as a general law governing possibly all Korean SOEs. mainly based on the OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of SOEs and economic theories of the firm.
SOEs run under a unique principle of pursuing both entrepreneurship and publicness comparing with private businesses. It is notable that the citizen is the consumer of goods and services supplied by SOEs as well as the owner of them. and SOEs' corporate governance is characterized as the multi-level hierarchical agent structure. Therefore. it should be emphasized that the government itself is a major source of agency cost of governance of SOEs. the minimization of which has to be a goal targeted by an enhanced corporate governance of SOEs.
SOEs are a useful means for the government which is obliged to provide the people with essential public goods and services in a more efficient way, thus it is myopic judging on SOEs' value of existence solely based on its 'X-efficiency', and thus. two reasons. as follows. should be considered design-ing an improved corporate governance for SOEs; one is that it is very difficult for the government itself to establish an environment under which its governance power over SOEs is restricted, and the other is that it is also difficult to make a compensation system which is to harmonize the managers' incentive with the shareholder's.
Discussions on how to improve corporate governance of SOEs should focus on the government and the board system. The government, which has omni-directional governance power over SOEs, has to restrain itself from its abuse of the power to let them operate autonomously, therefore its resolute will to enforce the governance-regulating law as its purpose requires is essential. Also. securing SOE board's autonomy is critical for establishing the 'Responsibility Management System' under the Act of 2007. Role of SOEs' board chair should be strengthened for the board's autonomy as well. and the chair should be a sole pathway for the government to infiltrate SOEs.
To enhance professionalism of board members and top managers, it is required that both an attractable compensation system for capable applicants and a detached performance-evaluation system properly put down roots in SOEs. In regard of the performance-evaluation system, a fair and trans-parent reimbursement system for expenses incurred in pursuing public policy objectives, such as the 'Community Service Obligations' of Australia. need be enacted into law, so that SOEs as well as their managers and board members can be assessed mainly based on their management performance. It could help prevent the government from bypassing the Congress' budget control over national projects by burdening SOEs with them.
Problems with SOEs are not the right reason for their privatization because SOEs have their unique merits, and private enterprises also have similar problems proving corporate governance of them is imperfect. They survived furious privatization debates over several generations. and nationalization and privatization have risen alternatively in conformity with political, economic and social circumstances then. Therefore, discussions on how to improve corporate governance of SOEs should start with looking straight at its innate characteristics instead of trying to just transplant private corporate governance to SOEs from a viewpoint that they are merely transitory beings toward privatization.
SOEs run under a unique principle of pursuing both entrepreneurship and publicness comparing with private businesses. It is notable that the citizen is the consumer of goods and services supplied by SOEs as well as the owner of them. and SOEs' corporate governance is characterized as the multi-level hierarchical agent structure. Therefore. it should be emphasized that the government itself is a major source of agency cost of governance of SOEs. the minimization of which has to be a goal targeted by an enhanced corporate governance of SOEs.
SOEs are a useful means for the government which is obliged to provide the people with essential public goods and services in a more efficient way, thus it is myopic judging on SOEs' value of existence solely based on its 'X-efficiency', and thus. two reasons. as follows. should be considered design-ing an improved corporate governance for SOEs; one is that it is very difficult for the government itself to establish an environment under which its governance power over SOEs is restricted, and the other is that it is also difficult to make a compensation system which is to harmonize the managers' incentive with the shareholder's.
Discussions on how to improve corporate governance of SOEs should focus on the government and the board system. The government, which has omni-directional governance power over SOEs, has to restrain itself from its abuse of the power to let them operate autonomously, therefore its resolute will to enforce the governance-regulating law as its purpose requires is essential. Also. securing SOE board's autonomy is critical for establishing the 'Responsibility Management System' under the Act of 2007. Role of SOEs' board chair should be strengthened for the board's autonomy as well. and the chair should be a sole pathway for the government to infiltrate SOEs.
To enhance professionalism of board members and top managers, it is required that both an attractable compensation system for capable applicants and a detached performance-evaluation system properly put down roots in SOEs. In regard of the performance-evaluation system, a fair and trans-parent reimbursement system for expenses incurred in pursuing public policy objectives, such as the 'Community Service Obligations' of Australia. need be enacted into law, so that SOEs as well as their managers and board members can be assessed mainly based on their management performance. It could help prevent the government from bypassing the Congress' budget control over national projects by burdening SOEs with them.
Problems with SOEs are not the right reason for their privatization because SOEs have their unique merits, and private enterprises also have similar problems proving corporate governance of them is imperfect. They survived furious privatization debates over several generations. and nationalization and privatization have risen alternatively in conformity with political, economic and social circumstances then. Therefore, discussions on how to improve corporate governance of SOEs should start with looking straight at its innate characteristics instead of trying to just transplant private corporate governance to SOEs from a viewpoint that they are merely transitory beings toward privatization.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 공기업의 개념 및 운영원리
Ⅲ. 공기업 지배구조의 특성
Ⅳ. 공기업 지배구조의 개선방안
Ⅴ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 강희갑 / 2004 / 회사지배구조론 / 명지대
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 곽관훈 / 2009 / 기업규제의 패러다임전환과 내부통제시스템 / 경제법연구 8 (1) : 27 ~ 51
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 곽채기 / 2006 / OECD 공기업지배구조 가이드라인과 공기업지배구조의 개혁 방향 / 기업지배구조리뷰
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김동희 / 2002 / 프랑스 공기업에 관한 연구 / 서울대학교 법학 43 (2)
5. [학위논문] - 김상대 / 2008 / 주식회사의 내부통제제도 법제화에 관한 연구 / 석사 / 성균관대대학원
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 곽관훈 / 2009 / 기업규제의 패러다임전환과 내부통제시스템 / 경제법연구 8 (1) : 27 ~ 51
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 곽채기 / 2006 / OECD 공기업지배구조 가이드라인과 공기업지배구조의 개혁 방향 / 기업지배구조리뷰
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김동희 / 2002 / 프랑스 공기업에 관한 연구 / 서울대학교 법학 43 (2)
5. [학위논문] - 김상대 / 2008 / 주식회사의 내부통제제도 법제화에 관한 연구 / 석사 / 성균관대대학원
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Current Corporate Governance Structure in Korea (3)
기업법연구
2005 .12
-
Current Corporate Governance Structure in Korea (I)
기업법연구
2005 .06
-
공기업의 기업지배구조에 대한 검토
서강법률논총
2016 .02
-
일본의 회사지배구조에 대한 연구
경영법률
2008 .01
-
1990년대 이후 북한의 기업지배구조 변화: 제도경제학적 접근
통일정책연구
2006 .01
-
Changes of Public Corporate Governance of SOEs after OECD Guidelines
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2012 .07
-
The Mediating Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance
산업경제연구
2013 .02
-
Transitional Corporate Governance in Japan
21세기정치학회보
2005 .12
-
Effectiveness of Ethical Governance in China"s Local Governments : A Perspective of Corporate Governance
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2013 .10
-
독일의 회사법제 운용경과와 시사점－최근 한국의 지배구조의 논의와 비교를 중심으로－
일감법학
2014 .01
-
사회연결망 분석기법을 활용한 기업지배구조와 기업성과 연구
경영과학
2012 .07
-
기업지배구조가 재무적 경영성과와 기업가치에 미치는 영향-한국기업지배구조원(CGS) 지배구조등급의 분석을 통한 실증검증-
기업경영연구
2011 .01
-
기업지배구조의 우수성 및 효과성과 이익의 질 간의 관계에 대한 연구
기업경영연구
2013 .01
-
기업지배구조와 감사품질, 경영성과의 관련성에 대한 실증연구
국제회계연구
2011 .06
-
기업지배구조 개선을 위한 이사회 제도에 관한 고찰 : 미국제도 개선내용의 도입가능성 검토를 중심으로
비교사법
2010 .09
-
미국 회사지배구조의 최근의 경향- 사베인즈-옥슬리법을 중심으로 -
외법논집
2005 .01
-
회사법상 이사회의 감독기능 강화에 관한 비교법적 검토(한국-일본) : 일본의 집행임원제 및 감사등위원회설치회사제도를 중심으로
법과기업연구
2014 .06
-
금융회사의 지배구조개선과 신인의무이론의 접목가능성
은행법연구
2018 .01
-
A Study on the Corporate Governance and Financial Variables Using Bayesian Network
전문경영인연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-366-002432242