지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The parties are free to agree on the number of arbitrators.
The role of the arbitrator is so significant in the arbitration system that its success or failure may depend on the credibility of the arbitrator. The arbitrator is endowed with not only the power of presiding arbitral procedures and of rendering arbitral awards, but also the right to remuneration and expense.
The composition of the arbitral tribunal will be examined in the light of general practice. The administration of the arbitration also implies a methodology aimed at ensuring the smooth-flow and impartiality of arbitral tribunal.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration identified a certain number of basic obligations and rights of an arbitrator, whatever the legal context of the arbitration in the cases.
The obligation to be and remain independent and impartial; to conduct the procedure equitrably; the obligation of confidentiality; the right to reasonable remuneration and the right to expect honest cooperation from the parties and appropriate assistance from the arbitration institution.
In practice, the party-appointed-arbitators in international commercial arbitration very often feel enormous pressure that comes from the expectation of the parties that nominated them.
When a person is approached in connection with his possible appointment as an arbitrator, he shall disclose any circumstances likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his impartiality and independence. An arbitrator, from the time of his appointment and throughout the arbitral proceedings, shall without delay disclose any such circumstances to the parties unless they have already been informed of them by him.
An arbitrator may be challenged only if circumstaces exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to his impartiality and independence, or if he does not possess qualifications agreed to by the parties.
A party may challenge an arbitrator appointed by him, or in whose appointment he has participated, only for reasons of which he becomes aware after the appointment has been made.
The arbitration procedure should respect the rules of due process and treat each of the parties on an equal footing, otherwise the award will be weakened owing to infringement of the rights of the defence. The requirement means that the responsibility of sole arbitrator and the arbitral tribunal is becoming increasingly specific.
The role of the arbitrator is so significant in the arbitration system that its success or failure may depend on the credibility of the arbitrator. The arbitrator is endowed with not only the power of presiding arbitral procedures and of rendering arbitral awards, but also the right to remuneration and expense.
The composition of the arbitral tribunal will be examined in the light of general practice. The administration of the arbitration also implies a methodology aimed at ensuring the smooth-flow and impartiality of arbitral tribunal.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration identified a certain number of basic obligations and rights of an arbitrator, whatever the legal context of the arbitration in the cases.
The obligation to be and remain independent and impartial; to conduct the procedure equitrably; the obligation of confidentiality; the right to reasonable remuneration and the right to expect honest cooperation from the parties and appropriate assistance from the arbitration institution.
In practice, the party-appointed-arbitators in international commercial arbitration very often feel enormous pressure that comes from the expectation of the parties that nominated them.
When a person is approached in connection with his possible appointment as an arbitrator, he shall disclose any circumstances likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his impartiality and independence. An arbitrator, from the time of his appointment and throughout the arbitral proceedings, shall without delay disclose any such circumstances to the parties unless they have already been informed of them by him.
An arbitrator may be challenged only if circumstaces exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to his impartiality and independence, or if he does not possess qualifications agreed to by the parties.
A party may challenge an arbitrator appointed by him, or in whose appointment he has participated, only for reasons of which he becomes aware after the appointment has been made.
The arbitration procedure should respect the rules of due process and treat each of the parties on an equal footing, otherwise the award will be weakened owing to infringement of the rights of the defence. The requirement means that the responsibility of sole arbitrator and the arbitral tribunal is becoming increasingly specific.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중재인선정계약의 성질
Ⅲ. 중재판정부의 중재권한
Ⅳ. 중재판정부권한의 제한
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (11)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Comparative Study on the Qualifications and Challenge of Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration
무역상무연구
2007 .12
-
국제상사중재에서 중재인선정 방식에 관한 연구
중재연구
2010 .01
-
중재인에 대한 기피
중재연구
2007 .01
-
국제상사중재에서 불완전중재판정부에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2009 .02
-
한·미간 중재인 문제로 인한 중재판정 취소의 소 비교분석
무역학회지
2011 .11
-
중재인 선정과 기피에 관한 연구
무역연구
2014 .01
-
ICC 중재에서 중재법원의 제3중재인 선정에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2008 .02
-
중재인의 중재절차 진행상 유의사항에 관한 연구 - 대한상사중재원의 절차를 중심으로 -
중재연구
2012 .01
-
중재인 선정과 법원의 역할에 관한 연구
중재연구
2010 .01
-
중국 중재제도의 특징에 관한 소고
중재연구
2005 .01
-
중재인선정 및 분야별 중재인 특성에 관한 연구
중재연구
2009 .01
-
중재판정부 구성에 관한 비교연구-외국중재규칙을 중심으로 -
중재연구
2006 .01
-
국제중재인의 자격과 양성방안에 관한 연구
중재연구
2015 .01
-
국제상사중재에서 중재인 선정에 관한 비교연구 : 국제중재규칙을 중심으로
통상정보연구
2006 .09
-
국제중재제도에서 중재인의 의무에 관한 소고
문화산업연구
2007 .06
-
한․중․미 중재인의 선정 및 기피에 관한 비교연구
중재연구
2011 .01
-
중재판정이 대법원에 의해 취소된 사례연구
중재연구
2011 .01
-
다수당사자중재에 있어서 중재인 선정방법
중재연구
2008 .01
-
중재판정의 승인과 집행
원광법학
2011 .01
-
남북상사중재에 있어 중재인선정방식에 관한 연구
중재연구
2008 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002884180