지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study purposes to examine how Korean historical studies has continually shown interest on some features of history since the oldest Korean History Journal, The Journal of Chin-Tan Society, was published from the year of 1934 to 1990'. It also aims at investigating the periodical features in the aspect of history of research. The total 1,301 articles are chosen from the journals of Chin-Tan Society, Korean Historical Association and Korean History Research and thoroughly investigated.
Firstly, in terms of time, various research results are produced since the 1960s. Consequently the general fundamental theories of Korean history were developed in the 1970s which led to a big progress in both quality and quantity levels of research. After 1980s, most researches of quantity have been accelerated in great numbers, but after the 1990s, Korean historical studies are relatively stabilized and balanced in quality and quantity compared to the past.
Secondly, in terms of field, the proportion that occupies the study field is as follows; history of politics (25.2%), history of society (17.05%), history of ideas(15.7%) and history of economics (15.5%). It is totally understandable when we consider the priority of importance to grasp a certain society. However, among the number of 1,301 articles, the figure of those four sections is totally 954 articles (73.4%), which produce contrary evidence that other fields of studies have been unsatisfactory so far.
On the other hand, the periodical research distribution is seen as follows; ancient times (25.6%), medieval times (20.9%), modern times (33.2%) and modem and contemporary times (20.3%). The quite balanced figures suggest that the development of periodical studies has been projected relatively evenly. However, the study of history, as a part of the contemporary study, is impossible to ignore the social trend, but it is desirable to maintain the study boundary.
Korean historical studies will have to focus on the expansion of variety and openness in its development in the future so that the uniqueness and universality of study can be recognized as one of the desirable studies in the world. That also justifies our history and secure historical universality in the world.
Firstly, in terms of time, various research results are produced since the 1960s. Consequently the general fundamental theories of Korean history were developed in the 1970s which led to a big progress in both quality and quantity levels of research. After 1980s, most researches of quantity have been accelerated in great numbers, but after the 1990s, Korean historical studies are relatively stabilized and balanced in quality and quantity compared to the past.
Secondly, in terms of field, the proportion that occupies the study field is as follows; history of politics (25.2%), history of society (17.05%), history of ideas(15.7%) and history of economics (15.5%). It is totally understandable when we consider the priority of importance to grasp a certain society. However, among the number of 1,301 articles, the figure of those four sections is totally 954 articles (73.4%), which produce contrary evidence that other fields of studies have been unsatisfactory so far.
On the other hand, the periodical research distribution is seen as follows; ancient times (25.6%), medieval times (20.9%), modern times (33.2%) and modem and contemporary times (20.3%). The quite balanced figures suggest that the development of periodical studies has been projected relatively evenly. However, the study of history, as a part of the contemporary study, is impossible to ignore the social trend, but it is desirable to maintain the study boundary.
Korean historical studies will have to focus on the expansion of variety and openness in its development in the future so that the uniqueness and universality of study can be recognized as one of the desirable studies in the world. That also justifies our history and secure historical universality in the world.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 1934~1945년의 한국사학
Ⅲ. 1945~1950년대의 한국사학
Ⅳ. 1960년대 한국사학의 새로운 양상
Ⅴ. 1970년대 한국사학의 발전
Ⅵ. 1980ㆍ90년대의 한국사학
Ⅷ. 맺는말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
현재의 한국사 연구와 역사관 문제
韓國史學史學報
2003 .01
-
세계사 교과서 현대사 단원의 학생 활동 분석
역사교육
2020 .06
-
역사 서술의 문학성과 역사소설의 새로운 경향
국어국문학
2005 .12
-
역사교육과 역사학의 거리
역사교육
2016 .06
-
지구사의 미래와 역사의 재개념화
역사학보
2008 .12
-
The Case of Korean History
Korea Journal
1970 .11
-
歷史敎材의 撰述에서 用語選定의 問題
역사교육
2009 .03
-
포스트모던 역사인식과 역사학습
역사교육
2000 .06
-
학생들의 역사 개념에 대한 이해 양상과 역사의식
역사교육
2009 .09
-
역사적 사실의 특징과 역사교육의 특수성
역사교육
2010 .03
-
역사적 사고력의 하위범주와 역사학습목표의 설정방안
역사교육
2000 .04
-
고등학교 세계사 교과서의 중국고중세사 서술 : 역사 용어를 중심으로
역사교육
2017 .06
-
한국사와 역사철학
유라시아문화
2020 .08
-
Insight into Korean History and Education
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2010 .06
-
중학교 국사교육의 의미와 내용구성
역사교육
2012 .12
-
한국 고대사 연구의 반성과 대안 -실증과 반도의 낡은 인식을 뛰어넘어-
고조선단군학
2004 .12
-
Korean Studies between the Social Sciences and Historical Studies : Debates over Modern and Contemporary Korean History
Korea Journal
2011 .09
-
역사교육의 최종 목표와 역사적 통찰력
역사교육
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002866783