개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Just like we need a transportation vehicle for space travel, we need a medium such as a time machine for a time travel in history. Historical research is impossible without medium. The result of historical research depends in the first place upon which medium a historian uses. The first thesis starting from this fact is that "history is medium."
Medium is necessary not only for historical research, but also for showing the result of that research. Since Herodotus, written history has been claimed to have unique historical authority. However the recent vortex of historical drama brought a crisis of written history and this is, in tum, perceived as a crisis of historiography. Why is a crisis of written history straightly taken as a crisis of historiography? Can written history alone represent scientific history and will the reconstruction of the past by a visual medium unavoidably lead to a fictionalization of history? The second thesis to tackle with these problems is that "medium is history."
The third subject of this paper is "the medial tum" in historical research and historiography. Transition through medium means opening a new perspective from the viewpoint of medium. This kind of new perspective is available when we think that innovations of media have led to social and civilizational change, not vice versa. For example, ancient states could be established thanks to legal systems and bureaucratic institutions based upon the invention of letters; Gutenberg's printing technique led to the Reformation; books triggered revolutions; the capitalism of printing contributed to the formation of nation as "an imagined community." Based upon these research results, we can put forward the thesis of "the medial tum" which considers medium as the decisively driving force of historical change.
History is basically storytelling, Storytelling is a compound word made up by story and telling. Story means narration with a plot, and telling is an expression method tailored to the medium's features. Historical storytelling is putting the past as contents into a medium as a form. Medium transforms the past into history. Medium is a container of the contents of the past rather than an instrument to deliver it. Since the past is turned into history and memory through medium, medium decides about the message of history, as Marshall McLuhan says that "medium is message."
For example, "the Chosun Dynasty Record" has determined the history of the King Jeongjo's era. In contrast, the history which the recently disclosed "Secret Letters" of King Jeongjo is conveying is quite different from the public one known from "the Chosun Dynasty Record". During the daytime, King Jeongjo tried to wield his absolute power by a cultural policy using literature as a medium of the Tao(道), whereas at night by private letters using reckless colloquialism. The former was the King Jeongjo's discourse, whereas the latter was his action. The historical viewpoint through medium gives an insight into such a discrepancy between discourse and action and opens up a new historical window by reconsidering "all the given history of societies as a history of the struggle between media."
Medium is necessary not only for historical research, but also for showing the result of that research. Since Herodotus, written history has been claimed to have unique historical authority. However the recent vortex of historical drama brought a crisis of written history and this is, in tum, perceived as a crisis of historiography. Why is a crisis of written history straightly taken as a crisis of historiography? Can written history alone represent scientific history and will the reconstruction of the past by a visual medium unavoidably lead to a fictionalization of history? The second thesis to tackle with these problems is that "medium is history."
The third subject of this paper is "the medial tum" in historical research and historiography. Transition through medium means opening a new perspective from the viewpoint of medium. This kind of new perspective is available when we think that innovations of media have led to social and civilizational change, not vice versa. For example, ancient states could be established thanks to legal systems and bureaucratic institutions based upon the invention of letters; Gutenberg's printing technique led to the Reformation; books triggered revolutions; the capitalism of printing contributed to the formation of nation as "an imagined community." Based upon these research results, we can put forward the thesis of "the medial tum" which considers medium as the decisively driving force of historical change.
History is basically storytelling, Storytelling is a compound word made up by story and telling. Story means narration with a plot, and telling is an expression method tailored to the medium's features. Historical storytelling is putting the past as contents into a medium as a form. Medium transforms the past into history. Medium is a container of the contents of the past rather than an instrument to deliver it. Since the past is turned into history and memory through medium, medium decides about the message of history, as Marshall McLuhan says that "medium is message."
For example, "the Chosun Dynasty Record" has determined the history of the King Jeongjo's era. In contrast, the history which the recently disclosed "Secret Letters" of King Jeongjo is conveying is quite different from the public one known from "the Chosun Dynasty Record". During the daytime, King Jeongjo tried to wield his absolute power by a cultural policy using literature as a medium of the Tao(道), whereas at night by private letters using reckless colloquialism. The former was the King Jeongjo's discourse, whereas the latter was his action. The historical viewpoint through medium gives an insight into such a discrepancy between discourse and action and opens up a new historical window by reconsidering "all the given history of societies as a history of the struggle between media."
목차
Ⅰ. 역사와 매체
Ⅱ. “역사는 매체다”
Ⅲ. “매체가 역사다”
Ⅳ. “지금까지 존재한 모든 사회의 역사는 매체투쟁의 역사다”
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
매체전환이후 : 매체에 대한 비판적 성찰
열린정신 인문학연구
2004 .01
-
어찰의 정치학 : 정조와 심환지
역사비평
2009 .05
-
[사상사ㆍ역사이론] 낡은 새로운 역사와 새로운 낡은 역사 : 역사이론ㆍ사학사의 침체와 사상사의 부상
역사학보
2013 .09
-
다시 생각해 본 敎授媒體의 效果性 論爭 -媒體와 學習과의 關係 理解와 媒體 活用 敎育에 주는 示唆點-
漢字漢文敎育
2008 .01
-
역사의 의미(Meaning in History)
신학지남
1977 .06
-
한국 근대사 연구의 ‘문화사적 전환’ - 역사 대중화, 식민지 근대성, 경험세계의 역사화 -
민족문화연구
2010 .01
-
매체와 국어교육
우리말연구
2012 .01
-
예술매체로서의 빛
지식의 지평
2015 .12
-
1990년대 한국사회의 ‘정조신드롬’ 대두와 배경 : 나약한 임금에서 절대계몽군주로의 재탄생
국학연구
2011 .06
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
역사서술은 사실의 발견인가, 허구의 창작인가?
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
매체를 활용한 한국어 문화 수업에 대한 선호도 및 요구 분석 연구 -비즈니스 한국어 수업을 중심으로-
민족문화연구
2015 .01
-
현대소설에 나타난 통신매체 인식 연구 - <고향>․<전화(電話)>에 나타난 전화매체를 중심으로 -
한국문학논총
2013 .01
-
역사소비를 위한 역사교육의 프레임 전환
역사와경계
2008 .09
-
역사교육과 역사학의 거리
역사교육
2016 .06
-
역사교육의 담론과 학문적 가능성
역사교육
2006 .03
-
새로 발굴새로 발굴한 『正祖御札帖』의 資料的 價値
대동문화연구
2009 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002849339