지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Anti competitive practices in the Japanese market are mostly vertical restrictions that have happened spontaneously in long term transaction, so they cannot be resolved uniform legal regulations. That is, Japan tends to block the advance of foreign companies and protect its own industries and markets through implicit solidarity among Japanese companies rather than legal institutional devices. For the abolition of Non Tariff Barriers(NTBs), which will be discussed in the negotiation of Korea Japan Free Trade Agreement(FT A) in progress, what is most important is the definition of NTBs and the reduction or abolition of anti competitive practices in the market that hinder actual access to the market.
One of main reasons for Korea's low record of export to Japan is the existence of anti competitive practices, namely, NTBs in the Japanese market. Thus, it is necessary to dig out anti competitive practices in the Japanese market and look for methods of resolving and overcoming them in order to accelerate the conclusion of Korea Japan FTA and to make public problems that cannot be solved just with the conclusion of FTA.
For this, we, benchmarking MOSS(Market Oriented, Sector Selective) Talk, US Japan SII (Structural Impediment Initiative), Framework Talks, etc. initiated by the U.S., need to have the Japanese government clarify its will of free trade externally and improve consumers' welfare internally through removing various public regulations and reforming exclusive commercial practices in the country. In addition, in the talk of Korea
Japan FTA, the establishment of a permanent Korea Japan joint organization should be maintained in order to detect exclusive commercial practices and remove or correct them continuously. Moreover, it is necessary to make it known that private barriers to trade that restrict smooth and fair competition are contrary to the fundamental spirit of WTO, impeding free trade and causing trade conflicts, so that private businesses may correct their exclusive commercial practices by themselves.
In conclusion, Korea Japan FTA should not be promoted in a short sight but be accessed step by step in a way of adjusting the two countries' common interests through the improvement of mutual understanding, comparison of the two countries' systems and theoretical experimental examination and analysis of competition related norms. In addition, as it is expected that competitive policy will be discussed in the dimension of WTO and defined as international regulations, we must be prepared for the future.
One of main reasons for Korea's low record of export to Japan is the existence of anti competitive practices, namely, NTBs in the Japanese market. Thus, it is necessary to dig out anti competitive practices in the Japanese market and look for methods of resolving and overcoming them in order to accelerate the conclusion of Korea Japan FTA and to make public problems that cannot be solved just with the conclusion of FTA.
For this, we, benchmarking MOSS(Market Oriented, Sector Selective) Talk, US Japan SII (Structural Impediment Initiative), Framework Talks, etc. initiated by the U.S., need to have the Japanese government clarify its will of free trade externally and improve consumers' welfare internally through removing various public regulations and reforming exclusive commercial practices in the country. In addition, in the talk of Korea
Japan FTA, the establishment of a permanent Korea Japan joint organization should be maintained in order to detect exclusive commercial practices and remove or correct them continuously. Moreover, it is necessary to make it known that private barriers to trade that restrict smooth and fair competition are contrary to the fundamental spirit of WTO, impeding free trade and causing trade conflicts, so that private businesses may correct their exclusive commercial practices by themselves.
In conclusion, Korea Japan FTA should not be promoted in a short sight but be accessed step by step in a way of adjusting the two countries' common interests through the improvement of mutual understanding, comparison of the two countries' systems and theoretical experimental examination and analysis of competition related norms. In addition, as it is expected that competitive policy will be discussed in the dimension of WTO and defined as international regulations, we must be prepared for the future.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 경쟁정책과 일본의 비관세장벽
Ⅲ. 일본의 반경쟁적 상관행의 특성과 문제점
Ⅳ. 한ㆍ일 FTA 접근전략
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
WTO경쟁정책과 일본형 상관행의 문제점
지역개발연구
2004 .07
-
일본의 무역장벽에 대한 한국의 정책적 고찰
관세학회지
2003 .08
-
일본의 FTA정책과 경제적 효과
통상정보연구
2006 .06
-
한ㆍ중ㆍ일과 미국간 FTA 체결이 한국의 무역구조에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2006 .08
-
한미 FTA가 일본에 미치는 영향
일본근대학연구
2006 .01
-
일본의 對동아시아 통상정책 변화와 추진방향에 관한 고찰
무역연구
2009 .01
-
FDI and Intra-Industry Trade Patterns under the Korea-Japan FTA
국제학논총
2007 .02
-
WTO 규정하에서 FTA 협정과의 몇 가지 검토
문화산업연구
2005 .06
-
한국의 FTA정책에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2003 .09
-
FTA 시장개방의 노동시장 영향 분석
관세학회지
2007 .02
-
글로벌 통상환경 변화와 일본의 통상정책
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2017 .12
-
한ㆍ중ㆍ일 자유무역협정(FTA)의 전망
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2003 .11
-
한ㆍ중ㆍ일 FTA의 경제적 효과와 산업부문별 전략적 선택에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2010 .11
-
Anti-Competitive Practices as Trade Barriers Used by Korea and Japan : Focusing on Intellectual Property Market
통상법률
2005 .12
-
Industrial Structure, Regional Trade Bias, and China's FTA with Korea and Japan
Seoul Journal of Economics
2006 .01
-
한중일 3국의 기능적 통합과 FTA
경제연구
2020 .01
-
한,일 간의 관광산업 증진을 위한 FTA 시나리오 및 영향 분석
호텔경영학연구
2008 .04
-
韓中貿易と韓日FTA(自由貿易協定)の推進方向に關すゐ硏究
관세학회지
2005 .05
-
비관세조치의 계량화와 FTA협상 전략에의 적용
무역연구
2015 .01
-
WTO 협정하에서 FTA 체결의정합성에 관한 연구
중재연구
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002848439